A Study of As Above ...So Below

[Don Barone]

Hi faithful readers, silent but loyal. In the other post of The Giza Rectangle that Mimics Giza I suggested that Ceres equaling sq rt of 3 + sq rt of 2 was a profound number in the overall configuration and make up of our solar system. Ceres, using sq rt of 3, was able to plot all the other outer planets.

Ceres * sq rt of 3 * 2 = Saturn

Ceres * sq rt of 3 * 4 = Uranus

[(Ceres * sq rt of 3 * 2) * Pi ] = Neptune

Mercury * 102 = Pluto ?

Mercury x 77.781746 (se explanation that follows)

This number can be derived once again at Giza if we know where to look. One must put themselves in the place of The Builders. What did they want to convey and how were they going to do it ? The number 77.781746 is derived from the diagonal of G2 divided by 8, I assume for the 8 planets. Thus we have:

One has to take (440 squared + 440 squared) = (193600 + 193600) = (387200) and square root of 387200 equals 622.254(rnd) and the diagonal of G1 their favourite pyramid. Since there are 8 planets I decided to divide the diagonal by 8 and got 77.78175. To see if my theory held true I figured they would have used Mercury as their base of 1 and so I simply multiplied Mercury x 77.78175 and obtained the number 57,909,050 x 77.78175 = 4,504,267,014. I figured they wanted to show us that taking the smallest planet and dividing into the furthest away planet (excluding Pluto for now) namely Neptune at semi major axis of 4,503,661,000 km and was close for 4503661000 / 4504267014 = 0.99987 or 99.99% accurate.

Now to me that was extremely clever of The Builders and was just one more reason to show us that The Great Pyramid (G1) was in fact meant to represent the planet Mercury !

More to come.

db

[Don Barone]

Okay onward.

I failed to mention in the earlier post that 387200 which is simply the square root of the diagonal of G1 can also, as a decimal (0.387200) give us the ratio of the semi major axes of Mercury to Earth of 2.583332. 1 / 0.387200 = 2.58264462. Accuracy this time is 2.58264462 / 2.583332 = 99.97%. Once again we have found a ratio concerning not only Mercury this time but drawing in Earth as well which also has been claimed to have it's various measurements embedded into The Great Pyramid. Here we have a nice example of showing both planets.

Since Ceres has been equated to square root of 3 what planet do you suppose we should select to represent the square root of 2? I think the selection is obvious, and I think, like the builders probably did, that square root of 2 should be represented by Mercury, an obvious choice I am sure you will all agree. So shall we put it to the test? We have seen what a great job Ceres did with square root of 3 can Mercury be as clever? Let's take a look.

The obvious first thing we have to find is the ratio of Mercury to the other planets. So here they are:

Mercury = 1.0
Venus = 1.868601
Earth = 2.583332
Mars = 3.93615678
Jupiter = 13.44431
Saturn = 25.7534603
Uranus = 49.5069206
Neptune = 77.78175

We have seen these before many times and they are quite useful for many things but we are trying to see how Mercury and the square root of 2 are going to make out so I think, as the builders probably did as well, the we should simply make Mercury the square root of 2. So Mercury will no longer be equal to 1 it will be equal to the square root of 2. As an example we will use 77.78175 and since Mercury now equals the square toot of 2 we must multiply this not by 1 but by the sq rt of 2 and we get ... 109.98 and I think we can all see that it probably was supposed to equal 110.00. So what do the other show us ? See below:

Neptune = 77.78175 x sq rt of 2 = 109.98 To me obviously wanting to show us 110.00 even
Uranus = 49.5069206 x sq rt of 2 = 70.01 Quite obviously showing us 70.00 even
Saturn = 25.7534603 x sq rt of 2 = 35.007 and again quite obviously showing us 35.00 even
Jupiter = 13.44431 x sq rt of 2 = 19.01 and of course wanting to show us 19 even

Now those were the outer planets and sq rt of 2 seemed to fit just fine. But what of the inner planets? Let's have a look:

Mars = 3.93615678 x sq rt of 2 = 5.566566 and leaves me scratching my head.
Earth = 2.583332 x sq rt of 2 = 3.6534 and other than being close to 1/100th of the days in a year really doesn't tell us too much. And last we have:
Venus = 1.868601 x sq rt of 2 = 2.642601 and other than being close to the sq rt of 7 (6.9833) really doesn't help too much either. So what can we conclude from this exercise ? Well for the builders and I it was designed into the Great Pyramid to show these outer planets. I ask you to look at the numbers we have got from using sq rt of 2 as Mercury instead of using 1. Does 110 and 70 and 35 and 19 look significant ? Maybe if you multiply them by 4 it might help. We then get 440, 280, 140 and 76. Do these ring a bell ? Think on it while I grab lunch.

Cheers
Don Barone
September 12th, 2024
1:30PM EST

[Don Barone]

Okay onward.

I am certain that those numbers above immediately made you think of the Great Pyramid. Is it possible that the builders deliberately designed The Great Pyramid ... TO SHOW ALL THE PLANETS ? I remember a long time in my earlier studies where I claimed that The Great Pyramid was simply a scale model of The Giza Plateau and the Giza Rectangle. I will have to take another look at those posts. Regardless it would be only a fool who would claim that showing the numbers we have got using Mercury and the sq rt of 2 of 110, 70, 35 (19 left out for now) are just meaningless coincidences. Coupled with all the other data we showed proving Mercury and the ratios and sq rt of 2 has to, in my studied opinion, give weight to the fact that it was designed purposefully to show these planets. Perhaps a nice colorful diagram will make it easier to grasp.

The Great Pyramid and The Outer Planets

I was just going over the drawing in my head that I was going to do and not only are we going to show Neptune and Uranus and Saturn and Jupiter but also Mars and The Sun. All in one nice neat drawing. Please give me no credit, I simply have found what The Builders have built. Don't fret about Mercury and Venus we will locate them in short order. 

Back shortly.

[Don Barone]

okay onward.

To save clutter I am going to place the planets on two diagrams, Here is the first. It shows the ratio almost exactly. Oh by the way, we may need the help of other pyramids before we get the job done properly. Here is the first:

CONCEPT AND DISCOVERY BY NICK LIEVENSE

The math, as I have explored elsewhere, is exact to within an inch.

Now we will go to the outer reaches of our solar system:

In the image below for clarity I have swung the base of The Great Pyramid to the left to make it so all planets are in order from The Sun. The base however is Neptune and the height is Uranus with one half the height as Saturn.

For scale Mercury is 4 x sq rt of 2 or 5.65685424949238 (x 77.78175 = 440.0000)

Well that is it for now.

Cheers

Don Barone

 

[Don Barone]

Okay onward.

We are now going to examine the inner planets. As we saw, none of them seemed to show us anything using the sq rt of 2 so, if my theory holds true, they must in some way be connected to the sq rt of 3.

In our analysis we determined that Ceres was equal to the sum of sq rt of 3 + sq rt of 2 with Mars equaling sq rt of 3. Here is that diagram beautifully displayed and illustrated by The Bent Pyramid.

The sq rt of 2 and sq rt of 3 was first illustrated and discovered by John Legon

If Mars is equal to the sq rt of 3 then what would the inner planets equal ? Below are the results.

Mars = 227,939,100 or sq rt of 3 or 1.73205080757. To calculate for the others we simply divide sq rt of 3 by 227,939,100 and then multiply that answer by the semi major axis of the remaining three planets thus we have:

1.73205080757 / 227,939,100 = 7.598743732729e-9

Thus:

 Earth would equal 7.598743732729e-9 x 149598261 and we get 1.1367588482

 Venus would equal 7.598743732729e-9 x 108,208,930 and we get 0.8222519287

 Mercury would equal 7.598743732729e-9 x 57,909,050 and we get 0.440036

I am sure you will have noted by now that Mercury is almost exactly 1 / 1000th of 440 and base of G1

Venus is almost exactly twice the base of G2 or 822.22 (2 x 411.11)

Earth should be 440 x 2.5833323 = 1136.666 and comes in at 1136.76

Thus my theory is proven to be correct by the very placing of the pyramids themselves. 

The Conclusion:

For centuries "man" has attempted to understand the cosmos. They have tried and failed to come up with a mathematical formula for the placing of the 8 planets of our solar system. The closest attempt was by Johann Daniel Titius and Johann Elert Bode.

                            

 It was called The Titius–Bode law. It stated:

Read more about this "law" here .

The chart is not at all accurate and the law was not even close to this formula but I digress. It is my studied opinion that the reason no one (until now) has ever successfully found the formula for the planetary distances from the Sun is because they have been looking in the wrong place and in the wrong way.   I, like many before me, searched in vain for the perfect formula for all the planets. Until ... I had an epiphany. I suddenly realized that two different forces and controls were at work here. It was not one single formula controlling the distances but was in fact two. An Above, and a Below with a no man's land in between. I think I have successfully proven that the "Above" was controlled by the square root of two and "The Below" was successfully shown to be controlled by the square root of 3. And in the middle or "The Borderline or Borderland" controlled by both square root of 3 and square root of 2 and in fact a disastrous region where neither of the square roots could dominate and thus nothing ever formed properly. The Borderline of sq rt of 3 + sq rt of 2 line. So The Above was controlled by the sq rt of 2 while The Below was controlled by sq rt of 3 and between them an area of chaos. That sure seems to be as good a description of our solar system as I have ever heard. How could this be ? How could two different controlling forces be at work in our solar system ? I am not sure but it could have to do with The Sun and it's constant battle with Saturn for control a sort of Osiris and Seth scenario.  The math is prefect. It is flawless and can easily be checked. Our Solar System is controlled by two different forces. The Square Root of 3 and The Square Root of 2 and separating them is "The Borderline" precisely sq rt of 3 + sq rt of 2 Mercury distances from The Sun.  Perfection and all shown clear as day on and in ...  THE SOLAR GIZA RECTANGLE !

 ... and the whole picture.

Emhotep

Don Barone

September 12th, 2024

8:33 PM EST