Time to Throw Everyhting You Think You Know into The Garbage

[Don Barone]

Hi all. I think I am riding another tsunami as I am getting insights far above my station. What do I mean by that ? It is simple I am getting insights almost as if someone is guiding me to find the next clue. Recent examples would be Gary Meisner coming along at just the right moment I need a Phi making machine. Then last night I was searching for things online and I happened onto a map of Giza I had not seen before. What was so different about this map ? Well it appeared to be done right to scale and more importantly it had "the cult pyramid of Khufu drawn on it, and even more important, it had The Sphinx and The Valley Temple drawn on it to scale. Here was my first opportunity to see how it all fit into my design. Trust me you will not believe what I found. Before I continue I would ask that you get a garbage can or pail and round up your books on Egyptology and please throw them where they belong, The Pseudoscience is at last over.

Yawn we have heard that before Don, I hear a heckler in the back row say, who by the way, has never had an original thought in his life. First you need to be able to disentangle yourself from the lies of academia. They have told you the ancients knew not Phi. I have shown that to be a blatant lie.  What else have they lied to you about ? Plenty as I hope this thread will show.

The first thing we need to do is dismiss the notion that The Royal cubit came first, that is before the constructions in Ancient Egypt. I had pointed out before that The Ancient Egyptians devised The Royal Cubit to fit things, or actually measurements,  already there.  This next part is very difficult for people for they think they are seeing our inch but what in fact they are seeing is simply a mathematical number as a consequence of and by the sacred numbers, sq rt 2, sq rt 3 and sq rt 5. You must forget inches, they do not exist. What I present are simply mathematical numbers. What the Egyptians did was to take these mystical and sacred numbers and devise their own system that would work for them. As an example 280 cubits was not the height of The Great Pyramid. The height of The Great Pyramid was the result of the mathematical expression, sq rt of 3 then divided by 3 then times 10,000 to get 5773.50 mathematical "inches". It was just fortuitous and brilliant of The Ancient Egyptians to see that this number could be divided almost perfectly by .... yup you guessed it 20.62 of these purely mathematical numbers of 5773.50 gave them 280 of their Royal Cubits. The base is even more ingenious. The base consists, AND PLEASE REMEMBER THESE ARE NOT OUR REAL INCHES BUT SIMPLY MATHEMATICAL RESULTS, of the 1/2 Pi / sq rt of 3 then times our 10,000. So the base becomes ... 3.14159265 / 2 then divided by 1.732050808 then times 10,000 and we get 9068.99682 of our purely mathematical so called inches.  Now here comes the beauty of what I am telling you. With The Royal Cubit it became possible for The Ancient Builders to show this mathematical perfection of numbers, devised solely mathematically, BY USING THE ROYAL CUBIT.  Perfect. So the reason 280 and 440(?) were chosen becomes obvious now ... the glove fit ! This also shows why the relationship between The Pyramid of Khufu and The Pyramid of Khafre can easily be the perfect ratio of sq rt of 3 to Phi or 1.732050808 / 1.618033988 or  1.07046627 for it was the mathematical number that The Ancient Builders were designing into them. Thus G2 would have been 9068.996821 / 1.07046627 or 8472.006 mathematical units and using their new found Royal Cubit which equaled 20.62 of them the Pyramid of Khafre was built to 410.864 ... Nice and neat and the way that things happened. A problem arises however. Who was the genius who devised this system of encoding these things in and on The Giza Plateau ... well I know his name, it was and is Imhotep ... who came in Peace from ... ? There you have it nice and neat and totally logical and explains how and why all the things I have been finding are findable.

[Don Barone]

Just a very quick reply as it is Mother's Day after all.

Try this one on for size.

The Giza Plateau is a scale model of The Great Pyramid in the scale, now get this, this is outlandishly brilliant, one inch to one cubit. Yup that's what I said. it is beautiful to see,  one inch in The Great Pyramid is equal to one cubit on The Giza Plateau !

and ....

of course conversely one pyramid inch equals one Giza Plateau cubit. it is almost beyond fantastically brilliant. Proof to follow after dinner ...

db

 

[Don Barone]

Hi okay i am back. To begin with this is not just a one night stand. This didn't just come to me over the course of a day or a week or a year or a couple of years. This is an accumulation of data I have acquired over  a lifetime of study. It involves many disciplines that on the surface seem unrelated but all eventually play a part in this awesome discovery. There is basic math, and of course geometry, then there is studying the mainstream version of history in Ancient Egypt and Sumeria, then it is studying the gods of the various ancient civilization, then there is the study of freemasonry and magic and of Christianity and Islam and Jewish belief and The Bible and the Torah. Then there was the systematic study of paintings and artists from The Renaissance back to The Crusades and then the study of Gothic Architecture and how it seemed to begin with the arrival back from The Crusades by The Templar who were rumored to have brought back great secrets and riches . Then there was the in depth study of Moses and The Ark  of The Covenant  and then the study of Stonehenge and all the  other fascinating things that were found from around the same era. And of course von Daniken and his chariots of The Gods and Zechariah Sitchin  and The Annunaki and the amazing stories left to us that told of The Gods by the Sumerians who we were to later find out that they were the same gods of The Bible and the Torah who said. "Let US make Man in our image" And then a study of geology and an obsessive in depth search within our solar system to find meaning in the numbers, for numbers are everything. As you can see I have done my homework. In all this however I sensed something was missing. I knew that all of it was important but it lacked a common thread, a thread that binds them all together. I had even done a website years ago asking that same question. What was the common thread in all of these various studies, and then ... as often happens when I least expect it, the answer arrived.  Last March, that's 2020 I picked up an old favorite of mine by David Furlong called appropriately, "The Keys to The Temple and started to look again at some of my old research.  As I studied the veils seemed to be lifting and the more I studied the clearer it got until after about 2 or 3 months I had it. I had the key. The "Don Key" was finally mine and the amazing joke of it all is that I was convinced I would find it in a silly video game called "Donkey Kong, Diddy's Kong Quest".  There are those that will scoff at that but what are they searching for through the entire 102 levels ...  bananas, beautiful .... GOLDEN YELLOW BANANAS, AND IN THIS GAME AS IN MY LIFE'S QUEST MUCH MORE VALUABLE THAN THE COINS WHICH THEY FIND ALONG THE WAY.  Was I mistaken. did I misinterpret what the designer had put into the game ? I tried to get in touch with him, a mysterious recluse in Japan but I was unsuccessful. But think about it, think about the very first Donkey Kong game . What was happening. Man was trying to climb a ladder, but there were constantly obstacles being thrown at him. but wait who was throwing the obstacles at 'Man" why it was Donkey Kong an ape of some description. In my opinion this same designer had encoded the rise of Mankind to the top of civilization and what was his prize when he successfully beat all the "barrels, the princess. it was the story of civilization and it was in a freaking video game. How bizarre could it get. Well Diddy's Kong Quest was worse and I became obsessed with the belief that there was an 103rd level. Now the fact that the shafts in the great pyramid exit at this level is not important, is it ?

Okay so out of this mind came the thread, the golden thread, the golden thread that binds the times ...it was and has always been ... Phi ! I had manged to trace the use of Phi from Renaissance paintings back to Sumeria and in some cases even  earlier. There was a minor problem however. The Mainstream media and Academia those pillars of The Pseudo-scientific world told us and still vehemently do to this moment that Phi was not used in the ancient world. They are to put it bluntly ... lying ! I think deliberately lying. For the moment I came to be able to almost recognize Phi on sight I began to see it everywhere, and I mean literally everywhere. From barns to churches to Masonic Halls to the Neo classical revival to Baalbek to Ancient Rome to Ancient Greece, to the ruins at Tiwanaku to the ruins at Puma Punku  and of course to Ancient Egypt.   It was everywhere and when I found it in one particular place that I wasn't expecting or looking the academic lying house of cards fell flat as a pancake and the truth started to slowly emerge. That is for my next post.

db

[Don Barone]

Okay one more post for this evening. Along with this  map I had of course found that the very causeway of The Pyramid that I have for years been saying was Phi, that very causeway was itself built to the ratio of Phi. It was Nirvana ! So now the notion that it was indeed meant to be Phi was to me a fact. However to the map. The map that once again has turned my head Topsy turfy as to what is really going on at Giza.  Firstly here is the map ...

As you can see it is a very detailed map with topography shown as well as "the cult pyramid of Khafre" and The Sphinx and The Valley Temple . Because Gary Meisner's Phi Matrix program is so quick and accurate I have taken to using it whenever I am doing research now to find any Phi ratios that would otherwise go unnoticed.  I decided to use it here to see if there were any Phi ratios here that I was overlooking. Here is the first one I discovered. Now the very fact that I found one should make front page news in Archeology magazine.  But the first please:

Now I had often thought that the finished stones at the top of the pyramid were deliberately left there and that the rest may not have been actually finished. does this diagram support that theory ?

Anyway it looks odd that the remaining finished stones seem to fit into the square defined by the Phi grid lines.

Okay number two:

This one shows that if the Pyramid of Khafre is 1 unit then the start of the mortuary temple is 1.618034 or Phi.  Now isn't that an odd coincidence especially considering all Egyptologists are adamant that Phi is not found at Giza or in all of Ancient Egypt for that matter. Hang however for the grand prize is about to be revealed.

As I continued to test various possibilities this one immediately caught my attention I wanted to see if the Sphinx met my Phi ratios. Well have a look for yourself.

This is really amazing. Now somehow I will have to verify this with in field measurements but how I am ever going to do that is beyond me although I remember reading that there is a geodetic survey marker on the Valley Temple. anyway that can come later, now the prize.

Here is the image with the Phi ratio marked. Majestic is too drab a word for what it shows ...

Well that was interesting but I was looking for something more spectacular. here it was ... I thought it looked like one of the lines could line up with The Great Pyramid so here is the final drawing ...

This diagram is dynamite, it is nitro glycerin, it is the drawing that should bring down Egyptology as we know it. For it shows that if you start at the east face of G2 and extend the phi grid to the center of ThE Valley Temple ... THEN ONE OF THE LINES HITS THE PRECISE CENTER LINE OF THE GREAT PYRAMID !

The ramifications of this are enormous for now it is child's play to calculate the distance to the center line of The Valley Temple. Since this grid has the values 1, 0.618034 , 1 and 1 is by definition 433.013 or the sq rt of 3 divided by 4 then times 1000.  So from the east face of The Pyramid of Khafre, from The Pyramid of Life, from The Pyramid of The Sun from The Pyramid of Phi it is ... amazingly,  the sq rt of 3 divided by 4 then times 1000 and then times 2.618034 to get a value of 1133.66 cubits. And because we now know that The Cult pyramid is 68.5 cubits south of the south side to give us precisely 274 cubits to the center both distances can be defined and plotted, and that's what I did. This next series of drawings were done using just the Phi grid and a straight edge and a marker ... Observe the miracle of Giza ...

Okay I am afraid I have to stop there because as usual I jumped in without checking to see how deep that water is and made a silly mistake. Everything so far is correct but my theory of 1 inch = 1 cubit will needs additional work I am afraid.

What I had done was to take  the sq rt of 5 divided by 4 then times 1000 or 559.017 and then add it to 1133.66 and got 1692.6 which was precisely the height in inches of the floor of The King's Chamber. I then had taken the diagonal of 353.44 which is the sq rt of 2 divided by 4 times 1000 and found that the diagonal was 500 and 500 plus 353.55 is eqaul to 853.55 and just one inch from the true value of the Queen's chamber floor of 852.6 inches. However on my drawing i had made I had showed the 559.017 going all the way to the east side of G2 and hence I had a value of 1692.6 in a straight line which unfortunately can't be done as far as I can see. However it is worth noting that the sq rt of 3 then divided by 4 then x 1000 then times Phi + 1 or 2.618034 PLUS sq rt of 5 divided by  4 x 1000 gives us the height of The Kings chamber in inches.  The thing that further convinced me I was right was this little gem I discovered.  The center-lines of The Queen's Chamber and  The King's  Chamber are 21 cubits apart and I like all of you have wondered and pondered on that forever but how about this for a reason.  The center line of The King's Chamber as most of us know is 21 cubits south of the center line of the Great Pyramid. Well we have all heard that a million times but how many of us decided to see how many inches that was ... Let's do it ... 21 cubits x 20.62 is, if you aren't please sit down, 433.02 inches ! Can you believe it ... more sq rt of 3 for The Great Pyramid. So the center lien of The Great Pyramid is exactly the distance that the east face of the Pyramid of Khafre is from the center line of The Great Pyramid ... so if we allow the center line of The Great Pyramid to be the center line and axis of another larger Greater Pyramid then the east face of The Pyramid of Khafre would be the center line of another King's Chamber ... now really how col is that ?

db

PS: to this post. I forgot to mention that we have all known that the plateau was in a 36 to 44 grid or 9 by 11 but we did not know that the height of The King's Chamber was 43/44ths of the vertical height of my Giza Rectangle.  Thus 1692.6 / 43 then times 44 = 1,731.96 and probably the figure we should be using.

db again

[Don Barone]

Just to illustrate my point.

db