|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 21, 2021 11:00:16 GMT -5
Hi all with our new understanding of the size of The Parthenon many, many new doors that were locked are now unlocked. It really does seem like Alice's adventures as we seriously go deeper and deeper into our murky past. What is slowly (actually more quickly than I can keep up with) revealing itself is a hitherto unknown part of our past. One of the keys to it was the discovery (by yours truly) that The Parthenon was precisely 4400 by 3600 GREEK FINGERS ! This to anyone who had been following my work was precisely what I had suggested for The Giza Rectangle very early in my research only it was 44 by 36 and which I now know is 44 x 39.37 (number of inches in a meter) for a vertical height of The Giza Plateau of 1732.28 Royal Cubits and 36 x 39.37 for the horizontal distance 1417.32 which again I had kicked around in the past but which I am now convinced is correct. What started this latest round of discoveries off was finding out that Nashville Tennessee had built a full scale replica of The Parthenon and there were many, many great pictures online so I could use them to study the dimensions. Please rest assured that I have written to Nashville City hall to find out where they got their measurements and if I could have a copy of them. However the true breakthrough came when I was drawing the scale onto one of my images of The Nashville Parthenon and got this configuration  In that instant I realized that what was being shown by half The Parthenon was in fact THE GIZA RECTANGLE and so I immediately started this journey ... But first I did something I had been quite remiss in not doing and that was to turn the Giza Rectangle upside down (Alice would like that with down being up and up being down) finally realizing that the top of the roof of The Parthenon where the slope originates from was the edge of G2 as show the the next series of images.
But then I did something clever I decided to join two Giza Rectangles together to show the 9 by 11 ratio I had found for half The Parthenon and got this series of images.
and this followed from that template
and then to finally get this image ...
Now one (of millions) of things shown in this image is that the slope of the two now smaller Parthenon, when their roof lines are extended hit ... THE EXACT CENTER OF G2 .
AMAZING ...
Time for a break
.
But before we leave consider this . if we use 1732.5 and 1417.5 we get this ... 4400 / 1732.5 = 2.53968254 while 4400 / 1732.28 = 2.54001 1732.5 / 44 = 39.375 1732.28 / 44 = 39.37 HOWEVER ... CONSIDER THIS ... Square root of 3 divided by 4 then times 1000 THEN divided by 11 gives us 39.3647911 THUS ARE THE MEASUREMENTS MEANT TO BE 44 X 39.3647911 OR 1732.050808 WHICH IS OF COURSE THE SQUARE ROOT OF 3 X 1000 AND 36 X 39.3647911 = 1417.133 Hmmmmm . |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 21, 2021 12:26:59 GMT -5
Hi all this next little piece is going to make you shake your heads and make you wonder a couple of things. The first will be a "Doh" moment when you try to wonder how you hadn't seen this obvious thing before The second will make yourself wonder and ask why ? Why have we not been told that this is what is being done to us ? Why do those who do these things do so in compete secret, actually in secret societies if you will. But the final thing you will ask and wonder is how this all can trace back to AT LEAST 5000 years ago and only a few can see it. Please be prepared to never look at our world the same again. I tried to post a prelude to this on Ma'at and it was deleted and I was barred from posting. They are afraid, they are afraid of knowledge they are afraid that we will find out ... they are the enemy Observe this is great stuff So we will go back to our double Parthenon of Giza ... Now I don't know if it just me but I had seen this design many, many times, or at least I thought I had so I went and decided for the first time to actually check out if I was right. Now please remember this design comes from two places. The Giza Rectangle (at least 5000 years old) and The Parthenon (not sure when it was first built) . It has not been doctored in any way. You all have followed my methodology so you will see that what is new is old and what is old is new.
Please enjoy our enlightenment ... "The Double Parthenon and The Giza Rectangle"
"A house that Jack built ...." and the amazing and bountiful proof that the design Jack used is OVER 5000 YEARS OLD !!!!!!!!!
And for further study we have this one on the go ...   The real secret here folks is that I have been right all along. The Secret and Sacred Code is indeed Phi and it has been hidden. It has been hidden in Renaissance art and we are told it is not there. It has been hidden in pre -Medieval Palaces and we are told it does not exist there either. It exists in Ancient Roman architecture mainly The Temples of Bacchus, Jupiter and Venus at Baalbek and of course The Pantheon and The Arch of Titius and we are told no - no it is not there either and it exists in The Parthenon and we are even told up to this present moment nope wrong again it is not there. And now I have found it is all the classical architecture of our stately homes, Georgian and others and we have never been told it is there as well. For I begin to see who and what the secret guilds were. THEY WERE INDEED THE MASONS AND THEY DELIBERATELY HID THE SECRET OF PHI AND ALL THE OLD NOBILITY THEY HID IT AS WELL IN THEIR PALACES. We have been lied to ... Phi did exist. It has existed as I said since the very dawn of civilization ... it was and is ... A GIFT OF THE GODS AND IT IS DELIBERATELY BEING KEPT FROM US. THE PROOF AND THE TRUTH HAS SET ME FREE. AMEN
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 21, 2021 12:48:30 GMT -5
Hi I have put it into this website if you want to bookmark it: 
Enjoy
db
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 21, 2021 15:53:42 GMT -5
Hi all ... It is always exciting for me when I start to discover new things for several reasons. Firstly I am 71 years old now and I keep thinking that my brain is beyond finding anything new and it is always a joy when totally out of the blue I get a revelation like The Parthenon at Giza. With that in mind I decided to visit an old friend that really was the birthplace of this search I have been on. It was and still is I think my favorite painting of all time ... I speak of course of Et in Arcadia ego or better and more commonly referred to as "The Shepherds of Arcadia". As most of you know I have done exhaustive research on this painting and I think have drawn more lines on it than any human in history so it came as a surprise to me as I put our new found knowledge to work and came up with what I finally think is The True Secret of The Shepherds of Arcadia. So sit back and enjoy as I roll through the 11 images and you can see how I built it up step by step and line by line in a logical and oh alright, clever way. Let the show begin. This time I truly think I have got it right. Step #1 The painting and the initial Phi ratio observed Step #2
Now if you look very closely you will see that the end of the tomb is very clearly marked and I simply drew the line to mark it.  Step #3
This step is based on the fact that I assumed that the pointing finger held major significance and so drew the vertical line at this point
The next step ... Step #4 is a bit of cleverness on my part. I had been thinking about The Parthenon and my Giza Rectangle and our old standby 9 by 11 and so I allowed the distance from the finger pointing line to the line marking the end of the tomb to be a value of 9 and using the distance as 9 calculated the value for 11 and drew the horizontal line that marked the 11 down value as in this image ...  Step 5 I drew the slope of the developing triangle  Step #6 I drew the other slope after measuring distance and checking with how the eye of the shepherdess fit in relation to the sloping shoe at bottom left.  Step #7 I drew the enclosing rectangle around this triangle I had created.  Step #8 I drew a horizontal line across the page from where the slope of this tomb meets the far right hand side of said tomb  Step #9 I drew a sloping line from where the line I had just drawn crossed the green rectangle on the left hand side line and where it joined the apex of our triangle  Step #10 I did the same thing on the right hand side ...  Step #11 I went over the key lines in a bold white line and of course realized in an instant what we had just discovered.  Before posting the last image I just want you to look again and realize that we have found is almost certainly correct for the slope of the mountains on the left line perfectly follow the line of slope. Step #12 and the secret of Poussin is a secret no more ...  I think you can take this one to the bank folks ... Amen db |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 21, 2021 16:19:03 GMT -5
And then just for good measure Nicolas Poussin threw in this to keep us sharp  |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 21, 2021 16:34:54 GMT -5
And just in case you didn't think he put in enough Phi ratios I give you this ...  |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 21, 2021 16:40:24 GMT -5
And just so we remember where we came from here is The Giza Parthenon again outlined in white ...  Until next time ... db |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 21, 2021 16:49:41 GMT -5
And something else I am working on ... This is from 792 AD and is the palace built by Charlemagne. No phi here apparently ... just keep the line moving  Probably more to come ... db |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 21, 2021 17:37:19 GMT -5
Anyone think I ready for my architects license ?  |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 21, 2021 19:01:29 GMT -5
Found a new program that gives Phi exactly so will be re-checking all my drawings. This one passed with flying colors.    Red diagonals are 1.0. Light blue are 0.618034 Red straight line are 1.0 and light blue cross lines are 0.618034 And now we have to do the right side of the painting and of course never forget the large one that was there in the beginning. Nope Poussin never heard about Phi ... or so the experts say. db |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 22, 2021 22:06:01 GMT -5
Okay I have a staggering amount of data to recheck from past work as things become clearer and clearer ... Here are my old notes on The Great Pyramid being a scale model of The Non Existent Giza Rectangle in a 5.4 to 1 ratio and an update on our recently found 13.2 ..  This image ties in with this one ..  And I was looking for an old image I had because I am still working on confirming my recent discovery of being able to find the three pyramids in the heart of The Great Pyramid and I was trying to double check the distances when I remembered an old image posted by a true and still active pioneer Jim Allison. Here is that image ...  I knew it would be useful in my endeavors. But I have learned a great deal since I first saw this image and I now see many more things a lot more clearly than I ever could back them so it's with this new found knowledge and insights that I post the following diagram. They really were trying to tell us something ...  and just in case you are looking for a cherry to put on top I give you this ...  There is so much more coming down the road as I recheck and re-look at older images. But I just to have to add this before I go ... I had been fooling around with Phi squared or 2.618034 divided by 3.618034 to 1/1000th of the height of The Pyramid at Medium in inches and had seen a number a million times as I did these calculations and then as I looked at Jim's image ... and there it was poking me in the eye ... 7.236 cubit is says ... what an interesting choice of distance especially since 2.618034 / 3.618034 is equal to 0.7236 ... It is everywhere, Phi and it's ratios are literally everywhere one cares to look. But that is the key to the secret ... YOU HAVE TO LOOK
Exciting times to be sure ... Amen |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 23, 2021 0:11:44 GMT -5
And was just drawing lines and figured maybe this is where they come from ...  . |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 23, 2021 0:32:14 GMT -5
You may think this is not important but it is ... Just one more secret we have revealed ... So you want to be an Architect ... well here's Architecture 101 ... Enjoy    Did you know that's what they taught you in Architecture School ... and come to think about it who was that first Architect ? In fact who was allegedly the very first Architect ? ... oh yeah Hiram of the up and coming Free Masons ... Amen |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 23, 2021 18:13:29 GMT -5
Still looking .... I had not done this before and well ...you be the judge. db |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 24, 2021 0:13:52 GMT -5
Okay I think I have it. I think I have managed to figure it all out and to get into the mind of those that created this wonder. As I stated very, very very early in my research I always claimed that The Great Pyramid was a scale model of The Giza Rectangle or could it be the other way around and did the Great Pyramid come first and then The Giza Rectangle ? I haven't figured that out for sure yet but I think I have manged to squeeze it in. It is not as perfect as I would have liked but I am pretty certain that I have the overall game plan for both figured out . It is pretty late here, about 1:00 AM, so i am just going to give a few teasers and post the main part tomorrow. The key for me was stumbling onto the fact that when the height of The Great Pyramid is divided by Phi, or 1.618034 we get, now this is classic, we get the square root of 3. Now how great is that ! That's right I didn't even know that and I can't believe it never came up for 280 (approximate height of The Great Pyramid) divided by Phi or 1.618034 gives us ... 173.05 cubits and awfully close to 1/10th of the vertical distance on my Giza Rectangle. It was the start ... The thing to keep in mind as we go along on this latest excursion is that I have for a very long time claimed that the key players are, sq rt of 3, sq rt of 5, Phi (easily got by sq rt of 5 + 1 then divide by two) and sq rt of two and maybe 9 by 11, the jury is still out on what exactly was used.
Okay so before I turn in let's list the things that The Giza Rectangle has ...
1) An enclosed rectangle in a certain configuration.
2) Three pyramids, two of which are in the exact square root of 3 to Phi ratio (G1 and G2)
3) The unusual fact that if one adds up the bases of G1 and G3 and then multiplies by Pi one gets 10 times G3
4) A constant and recurring square root of 3 to Phi ratio showing up in not only in the sizes of G1 and G2 but the also in the distance measured down to the center of G2 from the north and from the south.
5) An amazing number of things that can be figured out with the sizes of the three pyramids.
Okay there are probably more that I am forgetting but you get the idea. So that's the challenge. That's what I have to find in The Great Pyramid. I have to find the rectangle, figure out the size of it, figure out where it goes and why, then show how the unusual x 10 thingy works and last but not least and this has been the struggle and I still am not completely happy with what I have but let's face it when you are designing things it is your prerogative to issue revisions, I have to find the three pyramids and fit them in an intelligent and coherent place within the heart of the pyramid.
It is a pretty thorough try and although it is not perfect it does show beyond doubt that they are one and the same design.
The Giza Rectangle is The Great Pyramid and The Great Pyramid is The Giza Rectangle.
Now how great is that ?
Amen
db
|
|
