|
Post by Don Barone on Jun 12, 2020 10:33:46 GMT -5
Study forthcoming
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Jun 12, 2020 15:12:10 GMT -5
20.6155 ? What a bizarre number to choose and where on Earth did it come from ? It has to do with my realization that I had to think only in cubits . Inches, feet, meters, miles, kilometers can no longer exist - only The Sacred and Royal Cubit . Now some will look at 20.6155 and feel that it can't be that but, and I have said this before ... Why does one of their Royal Cubits have to equal an even number of our inches ? They really aren't related at all, only because we use them (inches) It is really like asking how many oranges go into 10 bananas . It is pointless. It starts with my diagram of the passageways of The Great Pyramid mainly because that image showed me that their was a logical and simple way that the passageways were obtained. The eventual net result may not have met the designers specs but the intent and placement of things is crystal clear . The keys were realizing that from the base to the underground horizontal shaft was 60 cubits and that the ascending passageway extended downward and right was 30 cubits . This then is that drawing: Taking that drawing I then proceeded to see what else the draftsmen could have designed and measured. That led to this diagram And now a list I did for quick reference And some old measurements Since I now believed that there was only one size cubit used for all seven pyramids my job was to check the evidence which consists of what actually has been measured . Use the image above for a guide to the inches. As you can see it seems to fit fairly well so far and I especial like The Pyramid of Khafre which I always felt should be 411 cubits exactly as it was at the 4/11 mark of the Giza Rectangle More to come
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Jun 12, 2020 18:15:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Jun 12, 2020 21:10:02 GMT -5
Okay what follows I can only describe as absolutely mind blowing . The angle of 191.4 had been pointed out in the past by my mentor Clive Ross and he also had found it at Giza . However what I am going to show you goes well beyond that and into the realm of either science fiction or The Gods . Follow along as I show you what I have just uncovered with the key being what we had just found at The Bent Pyramid. So let's begin . I started with a simple circle and drew the diameters. Next because of the difference in angles I drew a line 11.4 off center to the right . I decided to use this as our base line and drew a second angle added on to this line and got the configuration below Here is what we created Now because of my obsession with ✓3 and Phi and because I had discovered that the ratio between G1 and G2 was just that I decided to mark ✓3 on the upper arm and Phi on the lower arm and got this configuration . And then I consulted Petrie's notes again and he had stated that The Great Pyramid was 43° 22' deflection from North so that is what I did and got this. I then drew lines 90° to this new 43°22' line at both ✓3 point and the Phi point and it looked like this And then from those new 90° lines I drew new 90° lines to our ✓3 and Phi point and it looked like this By this time I knew what I had and so I rotated the drawing 43° 22' to the right and got this And then we realize what we have just created THE GIZA RECTANGLE as found on The Giza Plateau. My god how clever were they ? Very humbling, as we salute the brilliance of whoever did this Amen
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Jun 13, 2020 0:51:37 GMT -5
Oh well and it looked so clever . The angle is 34.17° and not 34.992° I guess I could say that G3 is in the wrong place but that has already been tried 😭 Still can't get The Bent Pyramid to fit at Giza. Thought I had it this time
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Jun 13, 2020 1:33:58 GMT -5
But I forgot that angle of 34+ is wrong So the total angle still fits but we need the North axis to have moved
|
|