Post by Don Barone on Jun 27, 2017 10:11:08 GMT -5
Hi all ... well I am still reeling from the error I made about Dash et al over at The Giza Plateau so I decided to go over a few of my old posts and came across one that I don't think I made clear enough when I first published it on this site:
I have over the years tried to show that that if we assign 440 cubits or base of G1 as semi major axis of Mercury then vertical distance at The Giza Plateau of 1732 cubits would equal semi major axis distance to Mars and it looked good but there has always been one small problem and it manifested itself beautifully in my analysis of Dash and Petrie ... DEPENDING ON THE NORTH POINT CHOSEN THE VERTICAL DISTANCE WILL ALWAYS CHANGE !!!! So can we find another way to prove my point of Mercury and Mars or any other planet ratios ? Well there is and I have already shown it but did not make it very clear so I will try again ...
First we will start with this diagram of the two larger pyramids at Giza. Now it is interesting to note here that no matter what point is chosen for the north point ... THE DISTANCE BETWEEN CORNERS OF ANY OF THE PYRAMIDS WILL NEVER CHANGE !!!!!! observe ...
Well what I did was to calculate these two measurements and this is what I got:
Next I used the Sun but this was wrong. I should have simply drawn the arc of base of The Great Pyramid and would have arrived at this diagram:
And this diagram shows us a most interesting ratio yet again. Now the nice thing about this is that it won't and can't change. No matter what north point we use THIS WILL ALWAYS WORK !!!!
Shall we draw in 840.092 ... where do you think it will land ?
Actually pretty neat when you think about it. But there is more to this corner ... What about the other line ? the one that is 1267.94 cubits. Can it ell us anything about Mars and Earth ? Well I think it can ... Observe.
First we need to get the measurements of both parts of the line. The first part (the green arc) is + or - 439.94 cubits. when we subtract this from 1267.94 we get 828.00 cubits ... but so what ?
Let's list them again:
828.00
439.94
Ratio is 828.00 / 439.94 = 1.8821
So total distance is 2.18821 ...
So now to Mars and Earth
Diameter of Mars = 6,792 km
Diameter of Earth = 12,756.28 km
Ratio = 12,756,.28 / 6792 = 1.8781 hmmm not quite close enough for our liking as it is only 1.8781 / 18821 = 0.9979
Lets try something else shall we ...
Orbital period of Mars = 686.98
Orbital period of Earth = 365.2564
Ratio = 686.98 / 365.25 = 1.88085 ... not bad now if we use 440 instead of 439.94 we get 827.94 / 440 = 1.8817 = 1.88085 / 1.8817 = 0.9996
Reasonably close so we have this diagram showing us the ratios of the distance from The Sun and then neatly also the time it takes to orbit that Sun !
And they get us coming and going ... clever these builders
More circumstantial evidence of a Mars/Earth correlation at The Giza Plateau ...
Cheers
Don Barone
I have over the years tried to show that that if we assign 440 cubits or base of G1 as semi major axis of Mercury then vertical distance at The Giza Plateau of 1732 cubits would equal semi major axis distance to Mars and it looked good but there has always been one small problem and it manifested itself beautifully in my analysis of Dash and Petrie ... DEPENDING ON THE NORTH POINT CHOSEN THE VERTICAL DISTANCE WILL ALWAYS CHANGE !!!! So can we find another way to prove my point of Mercury and Mars or any other planet ratios ? Well there is and I have already shown it but did not make it very clear so I will try again ...
First we will start with this diagram of the two larger pyramids at Giza. Now it is interesting to note here that no matter what point is chosen for the north point ... THE DISTANCE BETWEEN CORNERS OF ANY OF THE PYRAMIDS WILL NEVER CHANGE !!!!!! observe ...
Well what I did was to calculate these two measurements and this is what I got:
Next I used the Sun but this was wrong. I should have simply drawn the arc of base of The Great Pyramid and would have arrived at this diagram:
And this diagram shows us a most interesting ratio yet again. Now the nice thing about this is that it won't and can't change. No matter what north point we use THIS WILL ALWAYS WORK !!!!
Shall we draw in 840.092 ... where do you think it will land ?
Actually pretty neat when you think about it. But there is more to this corner ... What about the other line ? the one that is 1267.94 cubits. Can it ell us anything about Mars and Earth ? Well I think it can ... Observe.
First we need to get the measurements of both parts of the line. The first part (the green arc) is + or - 439.94 cubits. when we subtract this from 1267.94 we get 828.00 cubits ... but so what ?
Let's list them again:
828.00
439.94
Ratio is 828.00 / 439.94 = 1.8821
So total distance is 2.18821 ...
So now to Mars and Earth
Diameter of Mars = 6,792 km
Diameter of Earth = 12,756.28 km
Ratio = 12,756,.28 / 6792 = 1.8781 hmmm not quite close enough for our liking as it is only 1.8781 / 18821 = 0.9979
Lets try something else shall we ...
Orbital period of Mars = 686.98
Orbital period of Earth = 365.2564
Ratio = 686.98 / 365.25 = 1.88085 ... not bad now if we use 440 instead of 439.94 we get 827.94 / 440 = 1.8817 = 1.88085 / 1.8817 = 0.9996
Reasonably close so we have this diagram showing us the ratios of the distance from The Sun and then neatly also the time it takes to orbit that Sun !
And they get us coming and going ... clever these builders
More circumstantial evidence of a Mars/Earth correlation at The Giza Plateau ...
Cheers
Don Barone
