Post by Don Barone on Jan 21, 2008 20:31:15 GMT -5
Author: Ahatmose (24.57.227.---)
Date: 22-Jan-08 00:44
Hi all. Alice asked me to post this for her. She is busy in the middle of another very happy Un-birthday party with The Mad Hatter. By the way did you know his hat size was a perfect 7 ?
Regardless here is one more little geometric gem Alice wants to share with you all. Firstly I must emphasize that the radii of the circles have been autocadded and compared to Petrie's measurements by C. Wayne Taylor and they do hit the corners of the pyramids I show, No trickery involved. It is a fact that the radii do define the corners of the pyramids. The fact that I choose to colour them to make them clearer is of no consequence, they fit and no amount of mumble jumble about what do I know means anything. The measurements fit plain and simple.
Now if you read my earlier posting great if not I will repost some of the more interesting ratios ...
Area of Blue divided by area of Black = 1.4025130342230635229624838641838
Yellow diameter divided by Black diameter = 1.4023924057578695151171510617672
Yellow area divided by Blue Area = 1.4022717876677852281755982331191
Yellow circumference divided by Black circumference = 1.4023289665211062590975254730713
Now if you are like me you might wonder what possible significance can such a random figure as 1.4025130342230635229624838641838 have. I was stumped as well and then I tried something at work today and it became crystal clear.
It started with me multiplying various know measurements by this figure and then it became obvious.
The sides of the Great Pyramid are said to be 440 cubits. Although this is not exact this is what is claimed was meant. The slight difference could be the reason it does not work out exactly as I have measured. The distances should be a bit smaller. Also I have not calculated the possible 7 minute deflection needed to go from my measurements and my north to Petrie's North ( Petrie's angle of chase Line = 44.877 degrees while I have it 45 degrees exactly. Difference at outside point of my Giza Circle which is about 3162 cubits away from the center of P3 is about 11.52 cubits or about an error of 0.36 % )
Revelation:
Side of Great pyramid ........... 440 cubits
1000 x's 1/Phi .................. 618.0339887 cubits
RATIO EQUALS .......... Do I have to do it ? Oh alright ....
1.4046227017043064731922428053765
Error in ratio of 0.00235 or about Black = 1093.46 x 00235 = 2.57 cubits and isn't the difference between what I claim and what Petrie measured ... about 2.86 cubits making the unaccounted for error about 6 inches.
Now if we use the actual measurements of the Great Pyramid instead of 440 this ratio would shrink and so we have to realize .... THAT THE CIRCLES ARE IN PROPORTION TO EACH IN THE RATIO OF THE GOLDEN MEAN. BOTH BY AREA AND CIRCUMFERENCE ... ALL 3 CIRCLES PART OF THE EQUATION
Some think I sell the ancient Egyptians short ... I contend it is other people who wish to deny the brilliance of the design of Giza and as I said .. each new day brings a new insite. So now she asks you all to finally realize what Giza is ... The Master Geometric Design of all Times !! And now accepted as such at Wonderland University ... even by Mr. Jack-in-the-Box who made a miraculous recovery once he had his spring amputated and was finally removed from the confines of his box ... all is golden in Wonderland
cheers
Don Barone (for Alice)
The Great Pyramid diagonal: It is Golden !!!
Author: Ahatmose (24.57.227.---)
Date: 22-Jan-08 01:18
Hi all ...
Ponder on this ...
Square root of 440 (cubits) squared x's 2
= 193600 x's 2
= 387200
= 622.254
But you know what all IT IS NOT 440 cubits square it is shorter than this and so I contend that the actual Great Pyramid diagonal is in fact ...............
618 .034 cubits !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Proving I think beyond a doubt what I have always contended that Phi is all around us at Giza.
Greetings and felicitations to all
Don Barone
This is good, very very very good .
In Love and Our Light
Don Barone
PS to Paul ... Hi Paul can you explain this 8 division and what you would like me to do. Please explain very slowly ...
Date: 22-Jan-08 00:44
Hi all. Alice asked me to post this for her. She is busy in the middle of another very happy Un-birthday party with The Mad Hatter. By the way did you know his hat size was a perfect 7 ?
Regardless here is one more little geometric gem Alice wants to share with you all. Firstly I must emphasize that the radii of the circles have been autocadded and compared to Petrie's measurements by C. Wayne Taylor and they do hit the corners of the pyramids I show, No trickery involved. It is a fact that the radii do define the corners of the pyramids. The fact that I choose to colour them to make them clearer is of no consequence, they fit and no amount of mumble jumble about what do I know means anything. The measurements fit plain and simple.
Now if you read my earlier posting great if not I will repost some of the more interesting ratios ...
Area of Blue divided by area of Black = 1.4025130342230635229624838641838
Yellow diameter divided by Black diameter = 1.4023924057578695151171510617672
Yellow area divided by Blue Area = 1.4022717876677852281755982331191
Yellow circumference divided by Black circumference = 1.4023289665211062590975254730713
Now if you are like me you might wonder what possible significance can such a random figure as 1.4025130342230635229624838641838 have. I was stumped as well and then I tried something at work today and it became crystal clear.
It started with me multiplying various know measurements by this figure and then it became obvious.
The sides of the Great Pyramid are said to be 440 cubits. Although this is not exact this is what is claimed was meant. The slight difference could be the reason it does not work out exactly as I have measured. The distances should be a bit smaller. Also I have not calculated the possible 7 minute deflection needed to go from my measurements and my north to Petrie's North ( Petrie's angle of chase Line = 44.877 degrees while I have it 45 degrees exactly. Difference at outside point of my Giza Circle which is about 3162 cubits away from the center of P3 is about 11.52 cubits or about an error of 0.36 % )
Revelation:
Side of Great pyramid ........... 440 cubits
1000 x's 1/Phi .................. 618.0339887 cubits
RATIO EQUALS .......... Do I have to do it ? Oh alright ....
1.4046227017043064731922428053765
Error in ratio of 0.00235 or about Black = 1093.46 x 00235 = 2.57 cubits and isn't the difference between what I claim and what Petrie measured ... about 2.86 cubits making the unaccounted for error about 6 inches.
Now if we use the actual measurements of the Great Pyramid instead of 440 this ratio would shrink and so we have to realize .... THAT THE CIRCLES ARE IN PROPORTION TO EACH IN THE RATIO OF THE GOLDEN MEAN. BOTH BY AREA AND CIRCUMFERENCE ... ALL 3 CIRCLES PART OF THE EQUATION
Some think I sell the ancient Egyptians short ... I contend it is other people who wish to deny the brilliance of the design of Giza and as I said .. each new day brings a new insite. So now she asks you all to finally realize what Giza is ... The Master Geometric Design of all Times !! And now accepted as such at Wonderland University ... even by Mr. Jack-in-the-Box who made a miraculous recovery once he had his spring amputated and was finally removed from the confines of his box ... all is golden in Wonderland
cheers
Don Barone (for Alice)
The Great Pyramid diagonal: It is Golden !!!
Author: Ahatmose (24.57.227.---)
Date: 22-Jan-08 01:18
Hi all ...
Ponder on this ...
Square root of 440 (cubits) squared x's 2
= 193600 x's 2
= 387200
= 622.254
But you know what all IT IS NOT 440 cubits square it is shorter than this and so I contend that the actual Great Pyramid diagonal is in fact ...............
618 .034 cubits !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Proving I think beyond a doubt what I have always contended that Phi is all around us at Giza.
Greetings and felicitations to all
Don Barone
This is good, very very very good .
In Love and Our Light
Don Barone
PS to Paul ... Hi Paul can you explain this 8 division and what you would like me to do. Please explain very slowly ...
