Pistone Giza grid 3

[ariston]

Dear Above and Belowers,

Pistone grid 3
A work in progress for posterity

Taking the dimensions of the immediate Giza Site as calculated by Flinders Petrie, we find that the shorter axis that is defined by the limits of Khufu and Menkaure is 1414.2135 royal cubits.

The base of Khufu is 440 royal cubits, by multiplying half of these integers,a surface area calculation can be made.




This visualisation of the dynamic involved presents us the surface area;

1414.2135rc/2*440rc/2=
707.10675rc*220rc=
155563.485rc.sq. surface area.

This figure can be shown to have an affinity with the series of values that define the rational precessional sequence, which is completed by 360*72=25920yrs/2=12960yrs

155563.485rc.sq./12=12963.62375rc.sq, however, their is a minute eccentricity, to accomodate the ideal figure;

12960rc.sq*12= 155520/rc.sq220rc=706.9090909090rc*2=
1413.1818181

so 1413.1818181rc*220rc dimensions defines the area of 155520
155520rc.sq/12=12960rc.sq*2=25920rc.sq

This division can also be visualized;



This is how the precessional series has been encoded into the Giza site.

Mayan Correlation

The area value given also shows an affinity with the mayan system of counting days as defined by the long count;

kin=1day*20=
uinal=20days*18=
tun=360days*20=
katun=7200days*20=
baktun=144,000 days

The Mayan Calendar from inception to termination is made up of 13 baktun, which is 144,000*13=1872000days, each baktun has the equivalent in years= 144,000/365.242=394.258 years.

Taking this baktun year figure and starting at 3114bce as start date and skipping 13 times brings us to 2012ce terminal date.

With this figure in mind, we intoduce the area figure derived from Giza=155520rc.sq Taking the area figure and square rooting it provides a numeric corroberation;

155520rc.sq-rooted=394.360rc , which has a difference of;

394.360rc-394.242(yrs)=0.1182

This points to a dimensional expression of measuring time, based on the Babylonian system. If we can assume that is exactly what the process indicates.

Biblical correlation

With this, we also find that the 394 years/144,000 baktun also has a biblical significance, Taking the underlying grid 1, which points to an origin for the value of 666 as given in Revelation, Kings and the book of Ezra, the superimposed grid 3 onto grid 1 is consistent in that both values found in the grids are also found in Revelations;



Revelation 7: The Lamb and the 144,000

Revelation14:The 144,000 sealed

"Whoever has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, it is the mark of man 666" Revs

To conclude, The numbers therefore found in the Book of Revelations can also be found, indirectly, with the geometry of the Giza Plateau, which also has correlation with Mayan Calendar values.

Kind Regards
Latona

[Charlotte]

Huh, the children are thankful, Latona, and for some reason the post was highlighted.

Kind Regards to you

Charlotte

[ariston]

Dear Charlotte,

The cigars are finally put away, no more for a while methinks.

I am going to contradict myself now. I do not believe the figures invovled in the Giza Site area scheme are based on precession. Something Don said, That the Ancients probably would not round off their values, I agree. The value of 25776 years defines actual precession, not 25920, a difference of 144 years. Do you think the founders would incorporate a figure that was not based on actuality, but rationalisations. We are after all talking about 144 years difference. No. Precision is the key word. Do you think that, being adherents to the key word, they would encode something that was not an actuality. Only a rationalised one. That does not seem to compute. Precession, therefore cannot be defined by base 72 in reality, only reationally. 2160 years per Zodiacal age is actually 2148 years. Based on the 72 year theory, an observer thinking a new age had dawned, would be 12 years too late.

Kind Regards
Latona

[PMacG]

Hi Latona.

As I pointed out on the other side the Egyptians worked on the addition and subtraction of the extra part, hence I said +/- 1. In the discussion why the Greeks gave the GP as working on 4320 you had to know the key to gain the correct value. So 4320 is the correct base value but 4380 x 10s would be the value after the addition has been added, as 4320/72 = 60.

I can say no more than that the values of 72, 2160, appear in the base workings of the Hexagrams to give a value of 25,920 in the Magic Square of Saturn, and that this has been related to Precession. The value of 25,776 = 144 less and 25,920/144 = 180 and this again = a 2 degree measure as a 1 degree measure is 360 x 72. We had discussed how the GP as well as the Sun works on a 720 degree value. So the result would be - 1 part of 720 = 51552. In this way by +/- 1 part all the values given in the Hexagrams could be completely rectified to the right values as observed in the movement's of the heavens - the hexagrams give you a central measure or value against which others can be balanced - I say this because they give the measurements of time as still use them.

Regards - Paul.