|
Post by Don Barone on May 7, 2007 21:07:52 GMT -5
Hi all. After many false starts and many dead ends I think I have finally found the solution to the Giza plateau. This diagram which you will follow step by step was done with only a ruler, a compass and a marker. Just like the Greeks would have done. It is simple, straight forward and elegant and all distances, angles and measurements have been checked with an autocad program by C. Wayne Taylor from Ma'at. I have to congratulate several people without who's work I could never have seen this. As in all things in my life it was simply one "key" which unlocked the door. in this case it was knowing that the baseline from center to center was 2000 Royal cubits. All else flowed from there. So before I begin ... thank you Graham Chase, Thank you Jim Allison and thank you John Legon and thank you Clive. It is all our work working together. So let us begin Diagram 1 Diagram 2 Diagram 3 Diagram 4 Diagram 5 Diagram 6 Diagram 7 Diagram 8 Diagram 9 Diagram 10 Diagram 11 Your Honour I rest my case, In Love and a brightly blazing light Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by magisterchessmutt on May 7, 2007 23:22:28 GMT -5
Then the judge sat down with the seeing eye dog, and officer Odie looked at the seeing eye dog, and the 21 8 x 10 color glossy photographs with the circles and arrows pointing to the scene of the crime. Looks good to me anyways pal! Congrats! Here it is over an entire year later anyhow, LOL! Best, Stephen Dail
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 8, 2007 5:40:21 GMT -5
Hi Stephen Actually I wasn't really just playing with the pencils at The Group "W" bench I also had a compass and ruler I have asked C. Wayne Taylor from the Ma'at site to do an Autocad version to show that it does fit and that any minor errors in the diagram as it exists is simply my inability to measure exactly. Hopefully he will have it ready shortly for me. Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 9, 2007 0:28:41 GMT -5
Hi all: Not Autocad but large enough I hope for the "blind". Click for super large imageCheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by den on May 9, 2007 7:33:49 GMT -5
Hi Don, your line E to K in your diagram, if you drew it from E to H it then appears that all corners are in line, is that an alusion , as it looks lke that in the photo pic as well, and does your diagram agree with John Legons diagram at www.legon.demon.co.uk/images/plan05.gif i look forward to a more precise drawing, dennis.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on May 9, 2007 8:23:31 GMT -5
Great drawings Don, looks like you are erecting a djed pillar from square one I know almost every square inch on the picture Have you found out yet about the X marking the spot and that curious temple? In about 3 month I will climb down Charlotte
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 9, 2007 16:26:35 GMT -5
Hi Charlotte There is much new happening over at Ma'at so pop on over (all). Well hopefully in 3 months we will have it narrowed down to the inch. I will be extremely interested in what you find in "our temple", I can hardly wait but there is still much being discovered each day so go over to Ma'at and see. In love and a flushed face ... AGAIN Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 9, 2007 20:59:12 GMT -5
Hi Charlotte et all. If an accurate autocad proves this diagram correct and I susepct it will, Giza is even more beautiful than I ever imagined. Prepeare to behold the glory of The Sphinx: Gateway And Anchor of Giza ! The beauty and perfection is overwhelming My very best Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 10, 2007 0:58:57 GMT -5
Hi all ... Just a minor correction: The error is simply in the angle at the top. On a 3/4/5 triangle the angle should be (Clive has it set to 37.83) 36.87 which I am sure it is on the right but I am trying to make it fit on the left as well. However I may be wrong in assuming that it would be the same on each side even though the line appears to hit either the NE corner of P3 or maybe even the SW corner of the middle satellite pyramid of P3. Without an autocad program it is impossible to tell. But the 3/4/5 triangle will in the future define the positioning of The Sphinx as will my earlier posting define the positioning of The Giza Pyramids. The days of the random rantings are over. I was challenged to find the fit and it has been accomplished. Here is a modified version of the diagram with the appropriate changes made. Cheers and may your light shine on as well Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by den on May 12, 2007 6:07:06 GMT -5
Hi Don, first i would like to say keep the good work up in your effort to disscover the true Giza site plan, and of course to all the other helpers, Now i have always felt that symbolic number was encoded in this site, and i have always felt that this number symbolism is linked to the unit what is called the inch, of course it has nothing to do with the Egyptians, but when one converts the cubit back into inches then the message is revealed, i did stick this up a few years ago on Grahams site, but thought with the present interest in all of this coupled with an odd feeling that the time is now ripe for the truth to come out, and Don you may be the one that starts this ball rolling to completion, anyway this is my take on certain Pyramid dimensions, Let me start by giving the dimensions of the three pyramids perimiters and what they seem to give in regards to there differences, G1 = 36278 in, G2 = 33902 in G3 = 16622 in , so G3 minus G2 = 2376 in or 198 ft, G2 minus G3 = 17280 in or 1440 ft, Now lets move on to the hieghts of the three pyramids, G1 = 5773.5 G2 = 5653.5 G3 = 2571 , so the difference between G1 and G2 is 120 in or 10 ft, . Now lets add the total of the three perimiters of the pyramids to the total of the hieghts of the three pyramids, they are perimiter totals = 86802 , hieght totals = 13998 , so add the two together and you get 100800 in or 8400 ft, Now i feel the Great Pyramid will have a special tiny pyramidion as its capstone , probably made of gold and itself may be truncated to a smaller diomond tip, as you see the total hieght is 13998 for the three pyramids, but if one was to remove this tiny pyramidion being at 1.2 inches then the hieght for the three would be reduced to 13996.8 in or 1166.4 ft , for those who have read John Michells , Dimensions of Paradise will know the significance of numbers like this, so this small pyramidion at 1.2 inches will also be truncated, it will be made of THREE different materials of a pure substance, the first might be of gold 1 inch high, the second at 0.2 inches high, maybe a silver, and note that a pyramid with a hieght of 0.2 will have a base of 0.314159265........ , and the final tip will be 0.1 high , maybe a diamond, so Don i hope im not muddying the waters , but thought you might be interested in another set of numbers, thats assuming your head hasnt exploded by now with all the other stuff you got going, anyway mate dont let those ortho nuts at Maat get too you, Cheers mate, Den.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on May 12, 2007 7:41:29 GMT -5
Hi Don, I just looked at your "new" site, pretty soon you will be taking up the "internets", but what could be more interesting and important to the whole world than solving the the riddle of the Sphinx? Gateway and Anchor of Giza It is often said that the Sphinx is the Guardian of the Giza Plateau, the anchor, and the gateway to what it is guarding? As I have said before, when I stood before the creature the first time all the bustling activity about me receded and this certain profound feeling took me in as if standing on holy ground, and the thought "all secrets are contained within the secret of the Sphinx" came to my mind. The whole Plateau is permiated by a magical energy if one can feel it Even the horses, camels, and donkeys there can, if you can read them. The Philosophers You know about the door on golden hinches leading to a river under the Sphinx which only opens by a magic word, where waits a man by a boat to ferry the seeker between two pillars inscribed with sacred symbols which are explained to him, and then he has to continue upstream on the journey perilous by himself. No matter which way you tell the story, it is a journey to "Know Thyself." Abu el Hoal - something to be feared. Madam Blavatsky "Behold the imperishable witness to the evolution of the human races from the Divine, and especially from the Androgynous Race, the Egyptian Sphinx." It's true you know, and as "den" point out in his informative post, the time may be near "when the Sphinx will break up into laughter and life on earth will come to naught." Waiting with some trepidation for the quantum leap. Charlotte
|
|
|
Post by den on May 12, 2007 10:09:44 GMT -5
Hi Don, that 2000 cubit axis, i would kind of like it to be 2000.485 , why , well its the old inch thing again, i have to agree with Legon,s base line but with a slight increase to 1417.7 cubits, as converting 2000.485 to inches reveals 41250 in, or 3437.5 ft , x 3.14181818 = 10800 ft , OH yea, i worked on the side length of 1732.1 cubits as its closer to the square root of 3, Best wishes, Den.
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 12, 2007 21:14:27 GMT -5
Hi Den and of course to Charlotte et al Yes I am working on a myriad of things again and one is kind of proving that the pyramids may indeed have been built around the time they say. [This has now changed ] Case in point present deflection from ala Petrie is about 5 minutes. Now our Earth travels from 24 degree tilt to 22.5 and so total swing is 1.5 degrees. Now the say this take 41,000 years and is a cycle so 20,500 from 22.5 - 24 and 20,500 years from24 degrees back to 22.5. Now I decided to check something and came to this possible realization. The whole Giza Plateau is constantly changing as far as angles go. As the tilt changes so does the eastern Horizon, Interestingly then 'Khufu' is always changing. Food for thought but now back to my proof. If it travels 1.5 degrees in 20,500 then in 1 year it will travel 1.5/20,500 = 7.3170731707317073170731707317073e-5 Times this by 4500 years (alleged dates of construction for The Pyramids) and we get ... hang on read this. This is about the fourth time I have tried to figure this out and I think I have it correct now Cycle takes 41000 years Angle of tilt from 22.5 to 24.0 = Difference of 1.5 degree So we have 1/2 cycle (22.5 to 24.0 as 20500 years) so ... 1.5 degrees in 20500 so ... .1 degrees in 20500/15 so ... .1 degree = 1366.66 years so ... 0.01 degrees in 136.66 years Also we have ... 20500 yrs = 1.5 degrees so in 1 yr we have 1.5/20500 so in 1 yr we have 7.3170731707317073170731707317073e-5 so in 4500 (alleged date of pyramids) we have 0.33 degree [ must be a Freemason ] 0.33 degrees = 19.76 minutes But deflection is only 5 minutes so what is going on here ? I have an idea but does anyone else want to guess ? More later ... Cheers In Love and The Light Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 13, 2007 16:16:30 GMT -5
Hi all, Sorry the above post is in error ... aw welll moving on Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on May 14, 2007 8:19:39 GMT -5
Hi Don, I don't know about you errors in figuring. About the disputed "inch", here is waht the Rosicrucians say: Pyramid inch, 1/500,000,000 part of earth's polar diameter, giving us our modern linier inch. Height, 5,819 inches; multiplied by a thousand million inches gives 91,840,000, the distance to the sun in miles. Lenght of diagonal of base, 12,934 inches; sum of of two, 25,869 or an inch for every year in the Sideral Year. Age variously given as from 2170 B.C. to 250,000 B.C.; the later figures are absurd. It is, however, logical to ascribe a greater age than 2170 B.C. Three most logical dates of foundation , 2170, 27, 970, or 53,770 B.C. ALWAYS found to be oriented true north and south. Remember the Champ saying that the 3 Pyramids at Giza are maybe 35,000 years old, maybe more, he thought. The Sphinx of the Rosicrucians "The Sphinx is the symbol to modern occultists of the ancient wisdom and spiritual culture of the Egyptians. It played an important part in the administration of the civil government as well. It's origin is contemporaneous with the advance of the human species into the Nile Valley, and its secret has to do with that advent--whence the entering peoples came, who they were, and the means whereby they were led to it." My quotation from Madam Blavatzky alludes to these words. "Its human head, animal body, rocky base, and (formerly) floral (lotus) embellishments in front suggests to the discerning, meaning which at once place this great monument rightfully within the pale of symbology on a titanic scale. It has been intimately associated with the ART of the Rosicrucian Fraternity, which in fact makes it impossible to give further detail on the printed page." "THE FACE IS STILL ONE OF POWER AND SELF-MASTERY" Confirming my journey to "Know Thyself." It is one thing to say "the riddle of the Sphinx is the riddle of man himself" and let it go at that, to solve it is another, but we're working on it "It's the last thing we'll ever have to do" smiled Mr. Hall. cheers and a Charlotte
|
|
|
Post by anonymous on Feb 22, 2010 14:27:38 GMT -5
You guys know you're all nuts right?
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Feb 22, 2010 19:22:29 GMT -5
Yes, we like being nuts! Are you "normal?" (Relative to whom?) How boring!
Charlotte
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Mar 1, 2010 14:57:34 GMT -5
Perhaps, if you have the courtesy to identify yourself and loose the rudeness, we would reply. Perhaps also, you have not read the sacred books and inscriptions on the Monuments of the Egyptians, not the literal translations. The link doesn't work
Charlotte
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Mar 2, 2010 9:26:19 GMT -5
Reading and listening to the song on yesterday's post by Anonymous my mind was changed. I must confess that even the first post didn't feel as rude as the words looked in one-liners, nevertheless I reacted, as happened before, to a guest coming here just to leave an insult.
One thing that changed my Mind in yesterday's post was the tone and undertone of politeness which makes the music they say, and it is my turn to appologize for my quick reaction, instead of heeding and letting linger the didn't feel rude and see what transpires further.
Judging by the words, of course I expected a different song, hence my interest in the link, but it was a good and informitive song. Aside from it and in a personal way, it reminded me of keeping up the good work to get to the Promised Land, twice.
Charlotte
|
|
|
Post by Anonygoose on Mar 2, 2010 18:00:54 GMT -5
I'm glad you have seen the true ways now charlotte.
Perhaps it is time for you to ditch your earthly monikers and join legion.
You all might be ready.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Mar 3, 2010 12:18:32 GMT -5
My earthly monikers are secondary and serve me in my daily comings and goings, but I am no stranger to Love and have made a full commitment below and above.
Thinking on such great a Schema, the more to it is heart-warming and encouraging.
Charlotte
|
|