|
|
Post by Don Barone on Oct 24, 2007 7:02:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Oct 24, 2007 8:37:40 GMT -5
Though I can't participate, I'm glad you people do this trail and error search as per the oft' quoted Edison light bulb.
If nothing was there nobody would be looking, obviously we "need to know." I thought Latona did very well with his diagrams, numbers, and explanations. I have a feeling that there is this one "missing link" yet to come from somebody and all will accounted for and line up, and the whole world will understand the mind of the AE, their ancestors and teachers - the "gods" of a former age.
Charlotte
|
|
|
|
Post by daz407 on Oct 24, 2007 10:55:31 GMT -5
Hi Charlotte "their ancestors and teachers - the "gods" of a former age." Just what EvD postulated  Daz |
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Oct 25, 2007 7:50:07 GMT -5
Hi Charlotte "their ancestors and teachers - the "gods" of a former age." Just what EvD postulated Daz Yes, but my gods are different from his ;D They didn't come in helicopters, space satellites, armoured cars, didn't shoot lasers and missles from an orbiting Space Station, but worked with "blazing sunlike arrows that were triggered by sound", and "blazing missles of smokeless fire". Charlotte |
|
|
|
Post by PMacG on Oct 25, 2007 8:22:49 GMT -5
Hi Charlotte.
If I was to add anything about the pyramids I think the general consensus would be 'well he would say that wouldn't he'. I feel we have ended up in position where firstly we are dealing with mindsets as to what the answer should be both conceptually and mathematically as we have so many theories. The idea of actually getting the ground plan put down by AE or whoever worked out has been the main achievement of the work given in Don's link, and if there is agreement on the square roots then both mine and Latona's work fits, but my own work comes from the very ancient source of the I Ching. and latona was working on the maths or the same maths as I described.
I have explained the visible and hidden nature of the numbers as being encoded as light and dark, or being above or below the surface of the ground or waters, and how light and dark the values work together. These numbers have also been related to the measure of the waters and the construction of the sacred mountain, which are given over a broad cultural base.
The lack of response to Wayne's postings seems all to familiar, but (as I point out in the book) maybe they aren't all supposed to get it, as I was always said most wouldn't. So as one is not concerned as to whether people understand the message, and no frustration is found in them not getting it, this allows us to pursue the goal. If I had been taken seriously I would have been like S Rushty and gone into hiding by now, so one should never question the power of the wisdom behind the creative process in these matters, and in this one has no delusions or problems with being right or wrong - it is just another way to try and make the light-bulb light up, and indeed finding out how it doesn't work is valid in the process of getting it to work.
Blessing - Paul.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Oct 26, 2007 8:44:37 GMT -5
Hi Paul,
Your work coming from the very ancient source of the I Ching, Latona's from many directions, Don's and Wayne's from geometry and maths, as well as so many others probing the Giza Plateau, are as positive and negative current flowing toward igniting THE light bulb illuminating the "one fits all" solution with no possibility of there being another.
As you know I don't believe that the Pyramids were built by "the ancient Egyptians", as they are not "ancient" in the first place considering human history. I talked to someone yesterday who, via Google Earth, is flooding the entire area of North Africa and the Mediterranean. The countless seashells all over the Plateau came up again, the area must have been under water for quiet some time for shells to develope. Madam B also mentions the waves "dashing against the Pyramids." If the sun set twice where it now rises, and rose twice where it now sets, as the Egyptian Priests told Herodotus concerning their time keeping, it would make the Gizamids some 78,000 years old, and when you stand before them you see eternity, not a pile of stones meant to be tombs.
I for one don't question the wisdom behind the creative process, or care about right or wrong, the wisdom being that we "aren't all sopposed to get it", because we're not ready for THE final light bulb and it would blind us. Vibrations have to be raised to a more powerful current already existing. Thank God for the ones that "never get it", they keep us grounded, and the ones who get some of it police the process so nobody gets too far ahead of the collective mind of humanity. The swimming or sinking together couldn't be more obvious these days.
Charlotte
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Oct 26, 2007 14:06:18 GMT -5
Hi Charlotte  Another wonderful post and just what I needed after finding out that the square roots as posted are in serious error and actually do not work out at all. But I am not really upset for I know inside that as believe it or not Anthony once sent to me "there is more out there". Not sure exactly how he meant it but I know what I mean. One of these days Steve Nixon will return my copy of David Wood's "Genisis: The First Book of Revelation" and then I know I will complete my research on the giant temple which is Giza with it's pentagram shape as it's base. Anyway please enjoy your trip to Egypt and see what goodies you can find out from those who know and I can't wait to find out what is in our secret place.  Cheers Don Barone |
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Oct 27, 2007 9:16:38 GMT -5
You're just like the rest of us in "the creative process", just keep doing it and when I get an "AHA" I will tell you because then you got it right  Who knows, maybe Anthony is an occultist in secret ;D as he quotes Madam B as of late, out of context I might add, hence it doesn't make any sense. We shouldn't be talking about the gentlemen in the making behind his back. Personally I justify it for having insulted me numerous times with his uncouth manners, and talking to his front bounces of a huge triangular tomb stone. For years now you have been "expressing a petulant complaint", i.e., whining, about Steve Nixon not returning your book. Do you need a few $ to buy another? I'll see what I can find out at Giza, hoping also the tourist police have a good day and ignore me  Charlotte |
|
|
|
Post by PMacG on Oct 27, 2007 10:18:01 GMT -5
Hi Charlotte.
The idea of the pyramids being surrounded by water fits the narrative of the ancients that I have gone into already, and like you I'm not seeing the pyramids as being built by the AE. Definite statements of this being fact are indeed open to too many questions, as with many other so called accepted facts that we base all our conceptual knowledge on, we are living under a cloud of delusions upon which people continually argue for or against without any firm ground to rest upon.
Like the land of Hypoborea I see the image of the GPs as pointing us towards a place of rest apart from the physical being that appears above the waters, so the answers are concealed within the body of the earth deep in the caves of the underworld - so to understand one we have to completely plumb the other completely. And yes we are being blocked from doing this by the mind police of our own cultural view, still all things in their correct time and place.
Blessings - Paul. Happy sojourning.
|
|
