|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 26, 2018 19:24:55 GMT -5
Hi all ... I was reflecting today while driving around on how far we have come in the last 20 years with our studies of Egypt and Giza and now all the other major pyramids as well and was thinking how these possibilities have never even been mentioned in any textbooks I have ever seen.
The first discovery we made, that as far as I know not only had it never been discovered before, it is still not acknowledged as being a fact, and that is the fact that the semi major ratio distance between Mercury and Venus is in the ratio of 1/2 sq rt of 3 to Phi. This discovery is a direct result of my discovery that The Great Pyramid and The Pyramid of Khafre are in the amazing ratio of sq rt of 3 (G1) and Phi (G2). As is par for the course this too has been ignored by most of the others who claim it is but a coincidence.
The second major discovery I made was that Earth and Mercury are in a simple relationship of Earth = 31 and Mercury = 12 and going hand in hand with that is the fact that from Venus to Earth becomes 19 / 12 and equals 1.58333 and leads to The Megalithic yard.
The third thing I will mention occurred just recently when I discovered that these same two numbers 12 and 31 and the ratio they produce of 2.583333 when you take this ratio to the power of Phi squared or 2.618034 we get 11.99 and then when we take the ratio (2.58333) to the power of Phi squared + 1 or 3.618034 we get our other number 30.99. A most amazing thing and it works for no other number that I have been able to find. But we can add to this discovery another discovery of mine that showed Phi squared + 1 (3.61803) divided by Phi squared (2.618034) gives us 1.3820 and this unbelievably is the ratio between Earth and Venus' semi major axis. So given 12 and 31 and Phi we can calculate the three inner planets ... what this in fact means is that Earth can said to be represented by Phi squared + 1 or 3.618034 and Venus would be 2.618034 ... now go try finding that in any textbook.
But I wasn't done yet ...
Working on a thought I had that the gods of Egypt were in fact numbers I managed to find several, well 4 actually, pairs and 1 trio or triumvirate of numbers that again are all a direct result of finding them first at Giza and within The Giza Rectangle. We have seen the first discovery where Mercury = 1/2 sq rt of 3 and Venus is Phi but added to this is the added bonus that when Venus is Phi ... Earth is in the ratio of the sq rt of 5 ... It is becasue of these facts, that have never even been discussed anywhere before or even acknowledged anywhere before, that were found at Giza that it finally became and becomes clear and explains so nicely why it kept coming up in my diagrams.
The last beautiful ratio discovered was that when the distance of Mars' semi major axis (227,939,100) is represented by the sq rt of 3 then the distance between Mars and Ceres is precisely seen to be the sq rt of 2
We can add to these the amazing discovery I made that The Great Pyramid is really a symbolic "Perfect Square" which when discovered leads us to the scale used in the entire works of The 3rd and 4th Dynasties and that is the symbolic inch and why it works to perfection.
Another could be the fact that the elliptical orbit of Mercury is such that it would take light 1200 seconds to travel it complete or 20 minutes and then we note how we discovered that G1 and G3 are in the ratio of 1 to 2.1831 or 3.1831 in total and this gives us, when used as a radius a circle of 20 units.
And we discovered that when Earth equals the cubit of 20.62 units Mars will equal 10 x Pi of those units
The list goes on and on and I did not make this post to pat myself on the back but to refresh your memories of what we have discovered and what is still being ignored.
So it is to the academics that I intend to go, to the astronomers and to the mathematicians and of course to NASA. Egypt has been let down big time by the so called Egyptologist who still waste countless hours and resources trying to figure out inane and really meaningless things about Egypt. They still refuse to even look at the measurements. This is so very strange. Anyway I will let you know how I make out. I emailed McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont and so far nothing but I intend to step up my emailing campaign.
Clive was right as I suspected all along. Giza IN FACT ALL OF EGYPT is The World's Oldest Book of Astronomy ... YET FOUND !
Who knows what Sumeria and The Ziggurats could have shown us had they been made of stone and had even been measured. Too bad there was no Petrie of Sumeria ... and Gobekli Tepe ... I wonder if they will bother measuring this gem ...
Regards
Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 27, 2018 13:52:28 GMT -5
So in the overall scheme of things what does all this mean ?
Well in my estimation in a Universe supposedly built on randomness and chaos the likelihood of finding these ratios: Phi, Pi, square root of 2, square root of 3 and square root of 5 involved as deeply in the order of things as they are, would seem almost nil yet it would appear more than likely that some sort of ... dare I say it, "INTELLIGENCE" must be involved in some way to give us these ratios so predominately. I have often heard of "The Big Bang" ... BUT WHO OR WHAT CREATED THE ORDER THAT IF FOLLOWS ?
At Giza and Meidum and Sakkara and Dashur "The Ancient Builders" left us their legacy and knowledge in stone. It was not to show us anything because as I have said by the time we reach the level of knowledge to understand it we will already know most of what it is showing us. So why build it ? In my estimation and it is now my belief that these ancient monuments of The 3rd and 4th Dynasty were built ... TO PROVE THAT THEY WERE HERE ! ... AND THAT THEY KNEW ! You can argue till you are blue in the face that they couldn't possibly have known all this but ... sorry they did and they left the proof of it not only at Giza as had been argued in the past, but at Sakkara and at Dashur and at Meidum where the same story is written in all four places. This is so far beyond coincidental that to suggest it is all a big coincidence is an insult to "Man" and his brain.
So who then ? Who was it that really left us their legacy ? For many years many have discussed the possibility of an earlier civilization, around 10,500 BC seems to be the average that is chosen as a date when this civilization flourished only to meet it's end in a cataclysm of some sort. But could a civilization as so called advanced as our or even more so have existed this far in the past ? Could a world wide calamity involving The Ice Ages and the melting water have caused a world wide end of life as they knew it ? Were they driven back to a "stone age" . Interestingly we are supposed to believe that what we have accomplished in 5000 years surpasses all other achievements of mankind who basically have been Man since around 250,000 BC. So apparently in the preceding 245,000 we only manged to advance ... well apparently we did not advance. Yet our brain was as capable then as it is now ... quite a story they expect us to swallow.
Speculation can only go so far so it is really a mute point trying to argue one way or the other but the existing evidence speaks for itself. They were here, whoever they are or were. They left us their knowledge at the four major sites in Egypt. The evidence is insurmountable and crying coincidence is almost an embarrassment now. So will anyone else double check my work ? Probably not for I am slowly discovering that many people do not understand it and that is so very tragic. It is derived entirely on ratios, Pythagoras' theorem and some simple square roots, namely 2, 3 and 5 and some division, some subtraction and some addition. And this many find too hard. I am not sure what to say. Most of this I learned in high school so really since that is as far as I went in school and took no math courses after that, the work I present appears to me to be at the level of what was once a Grade 12 level. And this is too hard these days ? Tragic.
Kepler before me had an undying faith in the fact that there was order in The Universe and specifically Our Solar System. Pythagoras also believed very strongly in "The Music of The Spheres" a fairly simple ratio that produces music that I just can't seem to get a handle on or I would pursue it. And I too believe strongly in an ordered and logical ... AND SIMPLE solution to our solar system and that is what I set out to find and have been somewhat successful with the help of The Giza Plateau and Rectangle.
It is a difficult business because academia believes in chaos and if order were to be found ... well there goes their Big Bang. So I ask if there is or was a Big Bang were the fundamental laws created along with it ? If so how ? and most importantly ... WHY ? I often ask myself these days how could the simple fact that Earth and Mercury are in an almost perfect 31 to 12 ratio have gone totally unnoticed for all these many years ? And also how could the ratio of Mercury to Venus being half sq rt 3 to Phi been unnoticed for an equally long time. How could the ratio of Earth as sq rt of 5 to Venus as Phi been ignored as well. I simply can't answer this. I can only surmise that no one cared enough to look.
I have suggested that rather than an entire body of all the planets that it is possible that there are planet pairs that work or were created together. Examples would include:
Mercury - Venus half sq rt 3 to Phi
Earth - Mercury 31/12
Earth - Venus sq rt 5 to Phi
Mars = 20 x Pi Earth = 20.62
Earth = 3.618033988 (Phi sqrd + 1) to Venus = 2.618033988 (Phi sqrd)
Mars - Ceres where Mars = sq rt of 3 and Ceres = sq rt of 3 + sq rt of 2 thus making difference between them sq rt of 2
It is also my belief that that is one order of things and the next layer is the outer planets and they follow their own drummer who I am presently looking for.
Regards
Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 6:57:46 GMT -5
Well a funny thing happened on my first try to get my points across to a wider audience ... here is the result of simply posting the ratio of Mercury and Earth equaling 31 to 12 and that 3.618034 divided by 2.618034 equal the ratio of Earth to Venus and that 2.583333 (31/12) to the power of Phi squared of 2.618034 equal 11.998 and 2.583333 to the power of Phi squared + 1 equal 30.994. Here is my reward for trying ...  Aw well try, try again. Regards Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 9:10:04 GMT -5
On another note allow me to post this ...
Now no offense to the mainstream but how is this different than this which I posted years ago ...
And the key line ... " ... We have to find a force that can act on nothing and turn it into everything. ... "
And first of all if the point had zero dimension calling it microscopic is a total misnomer becasue it couldn't have been seen by anything ...
And even in my dreams I can not imagine a point of zero dimension housing an infinite amount of matter and energy. This is total ... well and they call my work pseudo science.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 9:15:33 GMT -5
And this ... from Alan Bennett. Alan Bennett was a seaman who wile sailing in The Gulf of Mexico had an encounter with a UFO. A couple of days later he had uncontrollable urge to start spouting numbers ... here is the story:
“I had an eight minute encounter with what most people would call a UFO in 1975, offshore, at night, in the Gulf of Mexico. Mathematics and geometry began issuing unbidden from my head within a few days thereafter. After working out the geometry for myself, I began to look at ancient religious sites and began finding the same geometry. It unveils a solar system model that dares to suggest our astronomers are using the wrong astronomical unit.
Solar Geometry is a mine for interplanetary patterns that are hidden by using Earth as the Astronomical Unit for measurements in our solar system. Why did several societies preserve these relationships in stone? What was so important about these relationships? I believe the ancients grasped clearly that the Earth is part of a mathematically ordered system. I believe the reason the relationships illustrated in Solar Geometry were left in stone in several ancient cultures is that the ancients grasped that there was a “star law” involved, which bespeaks the eternal recurrence of Earth like planets.
I believe I have rediscovered an ancient way of looking at our solar system in which astronomy is a sacred science that tells us we are all eternal, for if the Earth is part of a star law (and it is) and if infinite numbers of Earths occur because of this (and they do) then each of us is eternal and infinite as a sub-process of the infinitely recurring process, Earth.”
Alan Bennett (1936-2003)
Solar Geometry
RIP Alan Bennett. Too bad I would have loved to discuss things with him.
db
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 10:13:29 GMT -5
And this diagram as proposed by Alan Bennett. It did not make a lot of sense before but it sure does now ... Observe first Alan's drawing: The drawing is incorrect. Sorry ...
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 10:26:56 GMT -5
Post deleted as it was in error. Sorry
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 10:29:45 GMT -5
Wrong also
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 10:58:26 GMT -5
Ditto to this one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 11:40:35 GMT -5
The same ...
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 11:53:44 GMT -5
Wrong again
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on May 28, 2018 12:06:53 GMT -5
And this ... from Alan Bennett. Alan Bennett was a seaman who wile sailing in The Gulf of Mexico had an encounter with a UFO. A couple of days later he had uncontrollable urge to start spouting numbers ... here is the story: “I had an eight minute encounter with what most people would call a UFO in 1975, offshore, at night, in the Gulf of Mexico. Mathematics and geometry began issuing unbidden from my head within a few days thereafter. After working out the geometry for myself, I began to look at ancient religious sites and began finding the same geometry. It unveils a solar system model that dares to suggest our astronomers are using the wrong astronomical unit.
Solar Geometry is a mine for interplanetary patterns that are hidden by using Earth as the Astronomical Unit for measurements in our solar system. Why did several societies preserve these relationships in stone? What was so important about these relationships? I believe the ancients grasped clearly that the Earth is part of a mathematically ordered system. I believe the reason the relationships illustrated in Solar Geometry were left in stone in several ancient cultures is that the ancients grasped that there was a “star law” involved, which bespeaks the eternal recurrence of Earth like planets.
I believe I have rediscovered an ancient way of looking at our solar system in which astronomy is a sacred science that tells us we are all eternal, for if the Earth is part of a star law (and it is) and if infinite numbers of Earths occur because of this (and they do) then each of us is eternal and infinite as a sub-process of the infinitely recurring process, Earth.”
Alan Bennett (1936-2003)
Solar GeometryRIP Alan Bennett. Too bad I would have loved to discuss things with him. db Love this post, astute Astronomers, the Ancients, as legends, myths, symbols and architecture testify, most of all I love "the each of us is eternal and infinite". "Life Eternal" is the way of the Orthodox Church. |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 13:19:56 GMT -5
Thanks Charlotte but I have just double checked his diagrams and I am afraid unless I am doing something wrong it is not correct. Cheers Don Barone PS: I will leave them up as once again a lesson to check before posting ... Changed my mind they are all gone   |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 14:19:14 GMT -5
On retrying the diagram it appears that Mercury and Earth are indeed in the correct place with Venus not checking for the time being. If I solve it I will post it again.
Regards
Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 16:29:38 GMT -5
I think this might have nailed it ... I kept trying the pentagram because of how prevalent Phi and Phi squared were in our other calculations ... What do you think ?  Cheers Don Barone |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 17:31:57 GMT -5
Error, error , error ... danger |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 18:49:06 GMT -5
Hi this one is a little more accurate but still is not exact ... rather frustrating actually  And with that I think I will bury this idea for a while ... Regards Don Barone |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 20:08:49 GMT -5
Okay let's look at two of Alan Bennett's little gems that do work rather nicely.
They are:
( Mars 4 / Earth ³ ) + ( Earth ³ / Mars 4 ) = 14
Earth ¾ * ( v1 + v2 + v3 + v6 ) = Jupiter
Remember we need to use the ratios to Mercury so here they are again ...
Planet Calculated Value from Solar Geometry
Mercury 1.0000000000000
Venus 1.8660254037844 [1.868601 (mine)]
Earth 2.5833057115410
Mars 3.9364580433138
Jupiter 13.4399084391945
So we have:
(3.9364580433138 to the 4th / 2.5833057115410³) + (2.5833057115410³ / 3.9364580433138 to the 4th)
gives us:
(240.1167782033 / 17.239609031649) + (17.239609031649 / 240.1167782033)
gives us
13.928203230275 + 0.07179676972449
13.928203230275 +
0.0717967697245 ================ 13.9999999999998 ===============
Actually pretty neat trick.
=========================================================================
Next up we have this one ...
Earth ¾ * ( v1 + v2 + v3 + v6 ) = Jupiter
3/4 power simply means to the power of 0.75
We have:
2.5833057115410 ¾ * (1 + 1.4142135623731 + 1.7320508075689 + 2.4494897427832 = Jupiter at 13.4399084391945
2.037660623713239 * 6.59575411272515 = Jupiter at 13.4399084391945
13.4399084391947 = Jupiter at 13.4399084391945
Checks for an unbelievable
13.4399084391945 / 13.4399084391947 = 0.999999999999985
As I said ... totally unbelievable.
Here is what Alan Bennett wrote:
The Kepler 3/4 Connection
The ¾ power is founded in the laws of planetary motion
At first glance, the 3/4 power used in relating Venus to Earth and Earth to Mars may seem odd or even contrived, but it becomes clear once you understand Kepler’s 3rd Law of planetary motion, which states:
The square of a planet’s orbital period is proportional to the cube of its average distance from the Sun.
So we have:
Distance ³ = Period ²
And, if we take the one-quarter power of this we get:
Distance ¾ = Period 2/4 = Period ½ = √Period
and this:
The Earth – Jupiter Relationship
It has long been thought that the ancients considered 6 to be the perfect number because 1+2+3=6 and 1*2*3=6. In this relationship, one also finds the union of 1, 2 and 3, the trinity. Or could, perhaps, the real answer be found in the following relationship?
Earth ¾ * ( √1 + √2 + √3 + √6 ) = Jupiter
Still shaking my head over this one that Alan discovered.
Regards
Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2018 20:22:10 GMT -5
And here is one I just discovered using Alan's number as a guide.
Mars to the 4th / Earth³ + Earth³ / Mars to the 4th = ... well I will leave that for now but we are going to use ...
Mars = 10Pi = 31.415926535897932384626433832795
Earth = The Cubit = 20.62
What will we get ... any guesses before I calculate this out for us ?
31.4159265358979 to the 4th / 20.62³ =
974090.9103400 / 8767.302328 + 8767.302328 / 974090.9103400 =
111.1049755921 + 0.009000497 =
111.104975921 +
0.009000497
==================================
111.114 or approximately 1000 / 9
==================================
I just found that interesting ... 
Regards
Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 30, 2018 7:53:11 GMT -5
Hi all. I hope you are not feeling neglected. In a start to trying to get my ideas to a wider audience I have joined an "Astronomy" board where I am starting to post some of my ideas. It is not going as well as I had hoped as it seems there are total non-believers everywhere. But I will persevere. If you are interested in following along and heaven forbid even making a comment join me over at ... CosmoQuest and the actual link to the thread: Is Egypt and it's Pyramids "The World's Oldest Book of Astronomy" ? Cheers and wish me luck Don Barone |
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on May 30, 2018 8:49:54 GMT -5
Hi all. I hope you are not feeling neglected. In a start to trying to get my ideas to a wider audience I have joined an "Astronomy" board where I am starting to post some of my ideas. It is not going as well as I had hoped as it seems there are total non-believers everywhere. But I will persevere. If you are interested in following along and heaven forbid even making a comment join me over at ... CosmoQuest and the actual link to the thread: Is Egypt and it's Pyramids "The World's Oldest Book of Astronomy" ? Cheers and wish me luck Don Barone Good luck, Don, hope you find help there. |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 30, 2018 12:19:14 GMT -5
Hi Charlotte. Thanks for the vote of good luck but it appears that the main posters of this site are even more Orthodox and rigid and intolerant than I ever could have supposed. I told one poster very politely that I would no longer answer his posts because he kept asking circular questions and a moderator posted ordering me to answer all questions directed at me if I wanted the thread to continue ... can you guess what I am going to do |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 30, 2018 12:41:26 GMT -5
Hi all ...
I am tired. Tired of silly questions and Doubting Thomas' and having to start my scenario of The Giza Plateau being The World's Oldest Book of Astronomy by spending 10 posts arguing on the size of the pyramid and how Petrie did not get the numbers in his book. It is simply mind numbing. Further to this is people's seeming total inability to understand what a ratio is. And what scaling or to a certain scale means. I mean these are supposed to be educated people, how do they not know these things ? And as always no matter how well I counter the arguments of the data itself they always come back to the argument ... well The Ancient Builders could not have known that especially in ancient Egypt at that time. I am almost ready to give up totally. For it I present it to an astronomy crowd I have to prove what Egyptologists already know about the size and placement of the various pyramids and as we know it I post it to Egyptologists they have no concept of the where to all of the planets. What to do ? ... I can't even have a stiff drink because we are out of rum.
Do I give up ? Well that is not my nature but I really don't know what to try next. Even if I go to NASA they are going to want a 6 volume series on The Pyramids of Egypt and their dimensions their builders the time it took and so on and so and so ...
But for now I am going to tell that moderator what I think of his order ...
It will of course be deleted but it will make me feel tons better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 30, 2018 12:52:27 GMT -5
... and so ends that chapter in the continuing saga of The World's Oldest Book of Astronomy |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 30, 2018 19:25:36 GMT -5
Moving forward this just in ... And then I finally realized what may be going on with this ... Finally figured out what this 1291 means ... It is, don't know how I missed it, 1/2 of the ratio of Earth to Mercury ! 2.58333 / 2 = 1.29126666. Armed with this we now see the relationship again in a new way between G2 and G1 Observe ... But we had determined that G2 was Phi so we actually have this: Phi x Pi x 2 x .000866025 (1/2 sq rt of 3 / 100) = semi major axis of Earth (0.008804363) which is what we got in our first diagram by going: sq rt of 3 x Pi x Phi = 8.804367 but expanded by 1,000 in other words 0.008804363 x 1000 = 8.804363 Not completely sure what this means but is is just another way of tying in Venus and Mercury and Earth using G2 and G1 So somehow the diameter of Mercury squared, then times 1/2 the ratio of Earth to Mercury, then x 1000 then x 2 = The Semi Major Axis of Earth.
How and why a diameter of this or any planet would figure in the calculation of a semi major axis is obviously my next project.
regards Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 30, 2018 21:20:48 GMT -5
Okay so I am still scratching my head over this one ...
As shown in this picture ...
The diameter of Mercury (4879.4) squared which equals 23808544.36 * 2 which equals 47617088.72 * Pi and we get 149,593,496
Meanwhile we also have 149,598,261 / 1291.96666 (which is 1/2 of ratio of Earth and Mercury of 2.583333 then * 1000) / 2 = 57909.00 which is 1/1000th of the semi major axis distance to Mercury (57909 * 1000 = 57,909,000.) So we see at play here 10 cubed (x 1000) Simplified of course is just Earth / Mercury or 2.58333 / 2 x 1000 to get 1291.6666. But it is still somewhat troubling to see the base of G2 which we have determined is Venus AND Phi being used as a diameter and then the resulting circumference used to calculate the semi major axis of Earth. Most intriguing.
I have no idea what devil's work is at play here but I will look at it again tomorrow. I still do not understand how a diameter of a planet can be a factor in determining the semi major axis of another planet. Is this just simply an honest co-incidence or is something more involved at work here ?
Regards Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 30, 2018 21:45:45 GMT -5
Okay while trying to fit Mercury diameter squared into solving semi major axis of Venus I found this.
Ratio of Venus to Earth (semi major axis') is 0.723330 Now interestingly Pi (3.14159265) x 0.723330 is equal to 2.2724082. Now if you have been paying attention to earlier posts you would notice that 440 inverted or reciprocal is 0.00227272727 and thus 0.44 = 2.27272727. Also if you have been paying attention you will remember me posting this:
Here are the sides of The Pyramid at Meidum:
N = 5677.2
E = 5694.5
S = 5681.3
W = 5675.0
===========
Total = 22728
===========
Now the base of G1 equals 440 cubits ... and inverse of this is 0.002272727272 and times 10,000,000 = 22727.3 and checks to within 7/10ths of an inch ... inverse of 22728 is 4.3998592045054558254135867652235e-5
So now we have Pi x ratio of Venus to Earth (0.723330) equaling 0.44006 and x 1000 will give us 440.06, So once again we see the base of G1 showing us the apparent fact that Pi x ratio of Venus to Earth (0.723330) / 1000 and take the reciprocal and we get 440.06 cubits ?
All very intriguing.
Regards Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 30, 2018 22:34:46 GMT -5
Was in bed but I figured I better post this before I forget it.
Diameter of Mercury squared is 4879.4 x 4879.4 = 23808544.36
Perimeter of The Great Pyramid using my 9068.9968 = 36275.9872
23808544.36 / 36275.9872 = 0.001523654141 times our usual 1000 and we get 1.523654141
Semi major axis of mars = 227,939,100
Semi major axis of earth = 149,598,261
---------------------------------------
Ratio is 1.523674797
=======================================
Checks for 1.523654141 /1.523674797 = 0.999986
36275.9872 as a reciprocal = 2.7563493057527876614338661393293e-4 x 1,000,000 = 275.635 and used as cubits gives us 275.635 x 20.62 = 5683.6 inches.
Here are the sides of The Pyramid at Meidum:
N = 5677.2
E = 5694.5
S = 5681.3
W = 5675.0
===========
Total = 22728
===========
Average is 22728 / 4 = 5682.0 or checking to within an inch an a half. so for a second time the diameter of Mercury squared figures in the solution of a semi major axis, this time to Mars.
Regards Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on May 31, 2018 10:00:10 GMT -5
Hi Charlotte. Thanks for the vote of good luck but it appears that the main posters of this site are even more Orthodox and rigid and intolerant than I ever could have supposed. I told one poster very politely that I would no longer answer his posts because he kept asking circular questions and a moderator posted ordering me to answer all questions directed at me if I wanted the thread to continue ... can you guess what I am going to do For this reason I don't visit sites, too much information to sort out and too much time to explore one theory. I read only a few posters on the web as time allows. Can't guess what you're doing next, maybe you have a bubbling brook nearby to forget about it for a while |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 31, 2018 19:54:45 GMT -5
Old dog ... new tricks.   
db
|
|
