Quick side trip to an apparent candidate for Nibiru

[Don Barone]

From this website:

Possible Evidence That Planet X Is Not Nibiru

Harold Levinson from the Southwest Research Institute has come forward with an email detailing evidence that Planet X is not Nibiru.
“It is scientifically impossible the Sumerians knew anything about this object, or that anything could have lived there.”
The newly discovered planet is around 10 times as heavy as Earth and 20 times as far from the sun as Neptune is. A full orbit of Planet X around the sun would take an estimated 10,000 to 20,000 years.

Janet Sitchin described this as a contributing factor that the planet is not Nibiru: "The length of orbit is very different. So. Unless there is something that is not quite correct in the calculations of 10,000 and 20,000 years, then it doesn’t correspond to what the Sumerians wrote about Nibiru.”

However, Janet retains the belief about the existence of Nibiru: "It could be that those calculations aren’t 100 percent right. I hope we find that it’s closer and is Nibiru, or maybe there is another planet that is Nibiru and this is not it.”

Well with my new found expertise on planets and their motion and speed I figured I would calculate this to see if the article was true.

Tools needed:

1) Kepler's Third Law which states the ratio of the planets semi major axis in comparison to The Earth's with Earth being 1 when cubed and when the square root is found it equals the number of years in the other planets orbit. A most useful tool ...

EXAMPLE #1)  Earth is 149,598,261 kilometers but this we call 1
              Mars is 227,939,100 so ratio is 227,939,100 / 149598261 =  1.5236748
So Kepler says if you cube this to get 1.5236748 cubed or 3.537340 and if we take the sqaure root of this we get 1.880782

Earth = 365.25 x 1.880782 = 686.96 (Accepted value either 686.971 or 686.98 )

EXAMPLE #2) Earth is 149,598,261
                   Saturn is 1,433,449,370 so ratio is 1433449370 / 149598261 = 9.5819922
So Kepler tells us to cube this and we get 9.5819922 cubed (9.5819922 x 9.5819922 x 9.5819922 ) or 879.766537 and then if we take the square root we get 29.661 years (Actual is 29.4571 or 10,759.22 days)

So now let's do our candidate for Nibiru

It is said to be 20 times further than Neptune and Neptune is 4 504,449,781 x 20 = 90,088,995,620 so now as a ratio to Earth we get 90,088,995,620 / 149,598,261 = 602.2062 to 1.

So Kepler tells us to cube this and we get 602.2062 cubed or 218391434 and square root this and we get 14,778 YEARS TO CIRCLE THE SUN !!!!!!

... and working out the speed which is another very simple formula we sq root of 1 /602.2 or 0.04075 km per sec or times 1000 gives us 40.75 meters per second or 146,700 meters per hour or 5,775,579 inches per hour or 481,298.25 feet and divide by 5280 = 91.155 miles per hour and what do you know about that ... we could keep up in our cars !

Here are 2 charts to help"





These simple formulae are critical because they show that all you need to figure out the ratio of the planets is to know how long they took to orbit The Sun.

Don't look now but there sure are an awful lot of familiar numbers in this problem ... off to check the validity of Planet X's data

Cheers
Don Barone

[Don Barone]

Nasa website:

Caltech researchers have found evidence suggesting there may be a "Planet X" deep in the solar system. This hypothetical Neptune-sized planet orbits our sun in a highly elongated orbit far beyond Pluto. The object, which the researchers have nicknamed "Planet Nine," could have a mass about 10 times that of Earth and orbit about 20 times farther from the sun on average than Neptune. It may take between 10,000 and 20,000 Earth years to make one full orbit around the sun.

"The possibility of a new planet is certainly an exciting one for me as a planetary scientist and for all of us," said Jim Green, director of NASA's Planetary Science Division. "This is not, however, the detection or discovery of a new planet. It's too early to say with certainty there's a so-called Planet X. What we're seeing is an early prediction based on modeling from limited observations. It's the start of a process that could lead to an exciting result."

I find it extremely interesting and enlightening that 20 x Neptune was chosen and I will post why in a diagram below ...



db

[daz407]

Hi Don

Reading the text is interesting when it comes to the 'number crunching' im laking with the math, having said that I'm slowly following at my own speed.

Regards

Daz

[Don Barone]

Hi daz that is great to here and great to see you here. any questions please ask.

Cheers
Don Barone