|
Post by Don Barone on May 23, 2017 13:37:37 GMT -5
Ending The Coincidences and Proving The Ancients Knew It All: Hi all as many here know I have an unshakable belief that the ancients knew where the planets were in our solar system. To prove many of my ideas I have used kilometres and metres and inches and feet and ... yes even cubits to prove my point but as was argued many times how could they all possibly be correct. And so it was while re-reading an old post at Ma'at that renewed that argument against anything but cubits that forced me to finally say to myself ... yup they are correct you know ! But you what ... cubits had to be wrong too, for if Egypt ever fell and the cubit was no longer used how could it be deciphered. There had to be a simple code, there just had to be ... and I predicted I would find it and I think I have ... A great many things are so much clearer to me now. The first being that the key in solving the puzzle of The Solar System and The Titius-Bode Law is in finally understanding ... and boy it took me an awful long time to figure it out, to finally figure out that maybe THE SUN IS NOT THE BEGINNING BUT IT IS THE END ! That maybe the universe is not expanding but is receding ... that God isn't watching his creation but that maybe, as I was told by The Illuminati, we are returning to God or as I would prefer ... THE CREATOR ! I know it is not making much sense now but I guarantee that soon it will. And really the most important key was getting rid of ALL THE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS .. all of them, INCLUDING KILOMETRES, MILES, FEET, INCHES, METRES, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY CUBITS. For as I thought on it ... if there was a "Creator" he would have never used any of our measurement systems ... but what system would he have used ... Remembering always "Keep It Simple Stupid" ... it had to be a totally simple system BUT IT HAD TO BE UNDERSTOOD BY THE MASSES ... and as a thought here it had to be able to be built ... So was The Tower of Babel really man's attempt not to build to God but to build his creation !!!!! And armed with those thoughts I slowly and painstakingly have discovered I think not only how The Ancients knew but how they built it into The Pyramids of Egypt, for now specifically into The Pyramid at Sakkara (later) and my all time favourite and the thing that has fascinated me forever ... THE GREAT PYRAMID OF GIZA AND OF A TEMPLE BUILT TO "THE CREATOR' TO SHOW HIS WORK !!!!!!!!!! I have never been so certain that all my previous work will be vindicated and that I can prove that The Great Pyramid was encoding at the least the planets and at the most ... "The Universe". Another key was in finally figuring out some of my thoughts from my original enlightenment in 1998. Here are the websites I refer to: The Language of "God"The Eclipse and The "God Pi"The Golden AngleA Secret CodeThe Secret Code Part IIDoes "The Circle" Exist .... and for now the most important idea I have ever had and how it has led me to the solution ... What is A Pyramid The reason I have posted some of my old websites is to emphasize that even back in 1998 I HAD THE ANSWER !!!!!!!! I just didn't know the questions ... It has taken me 19 years to finally figure out what the knowledge I had was meant for .. and what questions it answered ... I have often said that after my "Illumination" or "Kundalini" I had been gifted with the answers TO EVERYTHING ... Most would make light of this claim as would I had I not been privy to the "zap of lightening" And as I often also recounted it all left me in a fit of rage and I honestly thought it had gone forever but I had never been able to control the initial burst of knowledge it had brought and so it was that no it was not lost but over the intervening 19 years tsunamis of wisdom were allowed to flow forth to the point at which we stand now ... THE PROOF OF MANY THINGS ! 1) THEY KNEW THE DISTANCES TO THE PLANETS 2) THEY BUILT THAT KNOWLEDGE INTO THE PYRAMIDS 3) THE HAD FIGURED OUT THE SECRET OT THE CREATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM 4) THEY KNEW WHERE IT HAD COME FROM AND HOW TO EASILY AND EXPERTLY PORTRAY IT ... AND NOT A RULER NEED TO BE FOUND ANYWHERE !!!!!!!!!! But as I say the key is on my page on "What is A Pyramid" and I have posted those old websites because they are so important in understanding how I got to where I am now. Enjoy and I will give you all some time to catch up on where I was back in 1999 and it is a nice base to be on as a start to where I will be taking you ... Cheers and Enjoy Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 23, 2017 15:18:34 GMT -5
Hi all what I am going to post below is some earlier work I had done on working on solving why The Titius-Bode rule did not work for all the planets, First a link to The Titius-Bode rule so at least you know what I am talking about ... Now here is what else it says on that page .... I broke my head over it for several years and couldn't quite figure out why Neptune appears to be the odd man out when Pluto is included ,... see diagram below So could I, a Grade 12 drop out have actually solved a problem that these great men couldn't ? ... Short of it is ... YES ! THE SOLVING OF THIS PUZZLE IS SO NEAT AS TO BE ALMOST UNBELIEVABLE IN IT'S SIMPLICITY I know I have said this before but this is really, really, really neat ! So how am I going to prove to even the biggest skeptic the following: 1) I know the formula for the planets of our solar system ! 2) I found it in the same place the ancients found it .. 3) And lastly it explains our creation (at least visually) and will vindicate ALL OF MY PREVIOUS WORK !!!! Please just stay tuned !!!! Life is so good ... Cheers Don Barone "Flying high among "The Gods"
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 23, 2017 16:44:09 GMT -5
Okay Chapter 1) I guess we have to start with the reasons for building the first pyramids. Why did Imhotep decide that this was a good idea and once we have that figured out we have to decide why the angle was what it was finally chosen to be. The actual shape of the pyramid really makes a lot of sense as it is a nice visualization of the rays of The Sun coming down to Earth .. as seen below ... or this one ... Sure looks like The Red Pyramid As you can see clearly they give the visual of the pyramid ... but I remember when this was first suggested to me I said to myself well yes that made sense to me but the rays of The Sun come down at many, many angles so why were certain particular angles chosen to build the pyramids. It was a question that was never adequately explained to me. I then tried to find out if there was any thing "sacred" about 5.5 seked and could not find anything that said it was. So in my new search there were no known measurements allowed, kilometres, feet, inches metres not even the cubit could I use in my research. Only known values were allowed ... The allowed could be using time in Earth days for example as they surely could have measured in Earth days the orbital time of the planets using simple observations. Other than that there was not a heck of a lot that we could use so I had to come up with another method of figuring how how they could have know where the planets were .. So let's play a game ... if they did know then how did they know ? We all agree that they probably didn't fly off in a spaceship and measure the distances, they certainly couldn't ask a friend and from all the research I have done you can't figure out distance to any planet from just knowing it's orbital speed. So ask yourself, assuming just for one moment that they did know, how do you suppose they might have known ? That's the question I kept asking myself over and over and over again because that they knew was never in question with me ... I had to figure out how they knew and I was determined to figure it out ... and I have ! Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 24, 2017 7:23:22 GMT -5
Okay let us again ponder one of the questions I have been asking for 20 years ... "Why are the planets where they are in their orbits around "The Sun". Interestingly nobody, and I mean nobody or nowhere is the answer to be found. We could send a spaceship to visit Pluto but they still to this day can not tell us why the solar system is what it is ... and I just believed, as most of you know, that the ancient's knew and had encoded it at Giza but the skeptics continued to ask me ... "Well then how did they know" ? It is a question I have tried to answer in a variety of ways until a break through of sorts came to me. Honestly if you don't believe me try to find the answer yourself online or anywhere as to why the planets follow the orbits that they do ... it is a mystery. But it is a mystery to me no more for "The Creator" in it's wisdom kept it simple ( as I always suspected it had to be) and when I show you the secret formula you can enjoy it as well. I had been doing some work recently on "Woman" being 157.5 and "Man" being 168 and "Pharaoh" or "God" being 192.5 or another way of stating this is Woman at 16.875, Man at 18.00 and "Pharaoh" or "God" at 20.625 (The Royal Cubit in inches) or even easier Woman at 9 "units", Man 9.6 units and Pharaoh or God at 11 units. NOTE: See my work on this on previous postings on this board. Now anyone who has read my work knows that I have continually found the ratio of 11 to 9 almost everywhere I looked at Giza with east to west distance as 1417.5 or 9 x 157.5 or in fact representing Woman or simply just 9 units while the north to south distance was 1732.5 or 9 x 192.5 or 175.5 x 11 or simply 11 units or Pharaoh or God. With this new understanding of what Giza could represent I realized that The Giza Rectangle appeared to be representing a Temple to Man and actually in fact to the creation itself as I had speculated in earlier posts of mine. So the net result of this is that it appeared that the number 11 could be representing not only The Royal Cubit of 20.625 but of "God" "himself" of better as "The Creator" So it appeared to me that all of a sudden "lucky" 11 had taken on a more esoteric meaning and so I figured it was the place to start in starting to solve the actual mystery of what I had been finding at Giza and in the rectangle and maybe even if I got lucky the why of it. But just a little side trip. One of the first "coincidences" I noticed at Giza was that when you took the number that you squared to find the diagonal of The Great Pyramid which is 387200 (sq rt of 440 x 440 x 2 or 2 "x" times "x" where "x" equals side of ANY square) Now this will work on any square but only one special square will yield the result as the sq rt of 387200 and that is of course the 440 cubits sided square but back to my early observation I had noted that 387200 is almost precisely the ratio of Mercury to Earth that being Mercury is 0.387097 of the distance that Earth is from The Sun using the semi major axis'. Example 57,909,050 Mercury (distance in kilometres) / 149598261 (Earth distance in kilometres) = 0.387097 This was of course laughed off as coincidence and it got added to the list of coincidences I had found. Lately however the coincidences started piling up with the following being noted ... Diagonal of The Great Pyramid when divided by 8 yields the number of times further from The Sun Neptune is than Mercury ( see illustration below) Diagonal of The Great Pyramid in cubits of 622.25 when divided by 13 gives us almost precisely the AVERAGE orbital speed of Mercury at 47.866 while officially it is given as 47.87 km per second. 387200 the number we square root to get the diagonal when divided by 13 gives us 29785 or 1000 times the actual speed of The Earth in it's rotation at 29.783 km/sec And of course the original observation that 440 / 5 gives us the number of days in the orbit of Mercury of 88 (actual is 87.979) ... The "coincidences" were piling up at an alarming rate and I started to suspect that this pyramid held a lot more that was just not discovered yet and that is where we will go next . Cheers and hope you are enjoying ... Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 24, 2017 9:22:01 GMT -5
Okay let's look at this number 77.78. What this means is that any number or measurement we choose for the distance to Mercury be it miles, kilometres or feet or inches or "Warwicks" the distance to Neptune will be 77.777777777 times the unit of measure we have chosen for Mercury. Example if we say Mercury is 100 "Barones" then Neptune will be 77.77 x 100 "Barones" or if we choose 750 "Charlottes" the distance to Neptune will be 77.777 times 750 Charlottes or if we go with 57,909,050 kilometres we get 77.77777 x 57,909,050 and 4504037222.22 kilometres to Neptune. On the surface you might be saying yeah well so what ... well it only works for this special square. No other square of any other dimension will yield this result so is it a coincidence or is it a clue ? Okay so back to the planets and The Titius-Bode Law. No one had ever solved this dilemma or why are the planets where they are until now and when you see the results you will say ... well now that is clever both to me for finding it and The Ancients for building it. With all this talk of 11 being God or Pharaoh I figured it had to be involved somewhere and then I thought of the logo of this board, As Above ... So Below and had a thought that if we used Ceres as the base line and starting from the Sun the four inner planets would be "The Below" and the four outer giant planets would be "The Above". I also had the thought that the saying has always been "as above so below" so I figured that maybe we had to find a common thread or denominator between the ratios of the four inner planets and the four outer planets. But where to start .. well as I said with all this talk about 11 being God I figured why not start with 11 and what planet should I start with well I chose Mars because it was the furthest out from The Sun and decided to assign Mars a value of 11 ... (good thinking me) and here is what I got ... Mars = 11 (227,939,100) Earth = 7.220 (1 / 227,939,100 / 149598261 = 1.52367) = 0.6563 x 11 = 7.220 Venus = 5.222 (1 / 227,939,100 / 108,208,930 = 2.10647) = 0.47473 x 11 = 5.222 Mercury = 2.795 and tantalizingly close to 2.8 or 1/100th of the height of The Great Pyrmaid I had been hoping for 11 and then 7 but got 11 and 7.220 close but no cigar (or so I thought) I figured but did note that is we let Mars = 11 then Ceres is equal to 414,001,000 / 227,939,100 = 1.8163 x 11 = 19.98 or almsot 20 ! So it gave us this diagram ... So I then decided to do "The Above" or outer planets and this is what I got ... Once again I assigned 11 "units" to the furthest planet and this time Neptune = 11 and this is what follows ... YOU ARE GOING TO LOVE THIS !!!!!! Neptune = 11 (4504,000,000) Uranus (get ready) = 7 (2,876,679,082 / 4,504,000,000 = 2876679082/4504000000 = 0.6387 and times 11 = 7.02 Saturn = 3.5 (1,433,449,370 / 4504000000 = .3183 and times 11 = 3.50 Jupiter = 1.9 (778,547,200 / 4504000000 = 0.172857 and time 11 = 1.90 Ceres = 40.5 (414001000 / 4504000000 = 0.09192 and times 11 = 1.0111 So as you can see it appears to be a nice logical progression form 11 downward ... But then I chanced to see this old diagram of mine as I was going through my hard drive ... and so it was that I finally invited Pluto to join the party. And what a life of the party he turned out to be for I was astounded when I figured out what value to assign Pluto. Pluto is none other than 2 times Uranus and Uranus we have already assigned a value of 7 so PLUTO THEN BECOMES 14 UNITS !!!!!!!!!!!!
AND SO THE RIDDLE OF WHERE THE PLANETS ARE IS SOLVED AS WE GET .... PLUTO = 14 NEPTUNE = 11 URANUS = 7 SATURN = 3.5 JUPITER = 1.9 CERES = 1.0111 But we weren't done yet it was obvious to see the pattern here as so I simply doubled the value to get the following: PLUTO = 280 NEPTUNE = 220 URANUS = 140 SATURN = 70 JUPITER = 38 CERES = 20.222 AND I AM SURE YOU CAN SUDDENLY SEE WHEE THIS HAS GONE ... IT HAS GIVEN US THE NUMBERS INVOLVED IN THE GREAT PYRAMID BUT I DECIDED TO DOUBLE THE NUMBERS AGAIN AND GOT THIS ... PLUTO = 560 NEPTUNE = 440 URANUS = 280 SATURN = 140 JUPITER = 76 CERES = 40.444 And so you have it ... The Great Pyramid is beautifully showing us the progression of ratios between the planets ... It has solved for us a riddle as old as modern science .. It shows us where the planets are in relation to one another and it leads to this magnificent drawing ... And the finale ... A PERFECT REPRESENTATION OF THE CREATOR'S WORK BUILT TO LAST FOR ALL TIMES AS A MONUMENT TO THE CREATOR AND HIS CREATION !!!! IT IS SO BEAUTIFUL ... I ALMOST WANT TO CRY ! Amen .... Don Barone ... enjoying his gift from "The Creator"
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 24, 2017 10:10:14 GMT -5
and just a very quick beginning to analyzing the shafts in light of recent discoveries ... Remember ... Keep it simple stupid ! Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2017 13:51:11 GMT -5
Hi all ... sorry about the delay in the continuing saga of Egypt in The III and IVth Dynasty but I had a visitor and I had no time to post ... but not no time to think. So what do we have after all of this ... Well we have a 3-dimensional model of our solar system having been built, by Imhotep in The IVth Dynasty, that shows precisely the ratios of the planets. The Solar System in stone as I have often claimed ! But for those who need further proof I will add this: Pluto = 14 (or 560) Neptune = 11 (or 440 base of G1) Uranus = 7 (or 280 or height of G1) Saturn = 3.5 (or 140 or 1/2 height of G1) Jupiter = 1.9 (or 76 distance to where the shafts meet under The King's Chamber) Ceres = 1.011 (or 40.44 or distance to base of Queen's Chamber) ... but what of Mars, Earth, Venus and Mercury ? Well ... Mars = 0.5566 Earth = 0.36525 (yup that's right) well actual is 0.36534 Venus = 0.26426 Mercury = 0.14142135624 (square root of 2 / 10 and divided into 11 [Neptune value] goes 77.7777777 times and gives us distance to Neptune Ceres = 20 / 11 = 1.81818182 x 0.5566 = 1.012 And in keeping with the theme and numbers in The Bible if we multiply all of these by 40 we get 14 x 40 = 560 11 x 40 = 440 7 x 40 = 280 3.5 x 40 = 140 1.9 x 40 = 76 1.011 x 40 = 40.44 0.5566 x 40 = 22.264 0.36535 x 40 = 14.6132 0.26426 x 40 = 10.5704 ?? 0.1414213654 = 5.6569 ( sq rt of 32 ! ) If we change 40.44 Ceres to 20 we get ... 20/40.44 = 0.49456 22.264 x 0.49456 = 11.01 14.6132 x 0.49456 = 7.227102 ( divide by 10 and we get the ratio of Earth to Venus) 10.5704 x 0.49456 = 5.227 5.6569 x 0.49456 = 2.7977 So one could say that sq rt of 2 is ... The First Sign of creation or is that "First Sine" ? Angle that has sq rt of 2 or 1.414213 as it's angle is 54.736 and here are the angles for The Bent Pyramid ... and John Legon pointed out could well be representing that concept ... And I have to emphasize here that this works for only ONE PYRAMID OF ONLY ONE BASE and that is seked 5.5 or 5.5 / 7 or 220 / 280 ... NO OTHER SQUARE OR PYRAMID WILL YIELD THESE RESULTS !!! Well except of course Pi and Phi and we shall take at look at that possibility next ... Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2017 22:40:08 GMT -5
Well I am still torturing the numbers and I have found this ....
Since Mercury * 77.781 = Neptune we find that Mercury = √2 / 10 or 0.141421356 when Neptune = 11
In AU Mercury is 0.387098 ... Now if we reciprocate these two numbers we get ...
1 / 0.387098 = 2.583325153 and 1 / 0.141421356 = 7.0710678
When we multiply these numbers together we get 18.266867366
Now for those who were paying attention in earlier lessons we found that for G2 when we figured out the diagonal we got 411.035 squared * 2 and then square rooted to get 168949.771225 * 2 = 337899.54245 and square root = 581.29. We then used this as a diameter to get 581.29 x Pi and we got 1826.18 and divided by 100 to get 18.261803885 and checking for 0.9997
To make it fit exactly we would need AU for Mercury to be 0.387205 and that would equal a square at The Great Pyramid of 440.003 cubits ... Very nice ...
Diagrams to follow ...
So diagonal of G2 * Pi = 100 times Earth / Mercury (2.5833) times (1 / √2 x 10 or) 7.0710678
Tying in G1 and G2 in yet another solar system way .
Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 28, 2017 23:25:40 GMT -5
And the image ... Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 29, 2017 9:26:28 GMT -5
Hi all ... Lots to write down but don't know where to start. My daughter insisted I write a book this time to keep the likes of Dan Brown from stealing my work or ideas but I just don't have the patience to do it all over again. In that case lets continue. I am sure you have seen the logo above (pretty clever I thought). It graphically illustrates in my opinion what Imhotep was trying to convey when he designed and maybe built The Great Pyramid. In its measurements, AND ONLY WITHIN THIS SPECIAL CASE OR PYRAMID, do we find all the ratios needed to show us "The Creator's" work. Only in this special seked 5.5 or 440 by 280 pyramid is it all revealed. I honestly don't know how Imhotep knew, but knew it he did and it was passed on for all of us to enjoy today. I am sure we have wondered many times why is The Great Pyramid at the seked 5.5 or 7 / 5.5 or 7 come 11. It is in it's simplest and purest form a look at the "Pillar of Creation" It is the mound of creation, it is The Ben Ben stone, it is the story of "The Creator's" creation ! Let's recap a few things and then let's move on to newer insights. I think the key to unravelling this beautiful design is in the diagonal. In a 440 units square the diagonal is simply square root of 2 x 440 or 1.4142135627 x 440 or 622.254. Now remember the number we used to get this 622.254 it is 1.4142135627. It will rear itself again. Now a breakthrough of sorts was seen when I divided this diagonal by 8 and arrived at 77.781745931. Since I had done all kinds of previous work on our solar system I realized that this was apparently the number of times Mercury's semi major axis will divide into Neptune's semi major axis ! And as I have pointed out earlier no matter what unit of measurement you choose for the semi major axis of Mercury, Neptune's semi major axis will be 77.781745931 times the unit of measurement you have chosen. NOW AGAIN I HAVE TO EMPHASIZE THAT IT ONLY WORKS FOR THIS PARTICULAR SQUARE !!!!!!!! I have been doing research on The Titus-Bode Law trying to figure out what simple formula "The Creator" had used in his design of "The Pyramid of Creation" and have finally determined that is in the simple 11, 7, 3.5, ... formula but I kept trying to simplify it even more and then once again drawing on my "Golden Calculator" I finally saw that if we make the semi major axis of Mercury √2 or 1.4142135627 we find that when we multiply by 77.781 we get ... this is the part I love ... we get ... 110 !!! This means that no longer do we need worry about how far Mercury is from The Sun for does it really matter ? It is simply, and beautifully one of the simplest numbers of all time and creation it is simply √2. So put away your rulers, no measurements required to solve this gem. So the secret is in the multiple of 11 that is 11 x 40 or 440 and 7 x 40 or 280 or in reality ... seked 5.5. It is the angle and seked of "The Pyramid of The Creation" We have found all kinds of other gems within it's measurements as well which I will detail later but I am beginning to see, and may Ra have mercy on my soul for saying this, that the tomb theory is very logical. We have proven that this pyramid is "The Pyramid of Creation" and at the top OR THE BEGINNING" is "God" so it would seem logical to build this over a tomb as a gateway OR LADDER to "God" and what lay at the top . Interesting eh ? Here is a website I had started to build. ... This website should be read first.Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on May 29, 2017 10:10:16 GMT -5
Nice picture of "The Ancient of Days", Don, looks like you have been busy. When spaceyhippie appeared, I thought perhaps he would be a partner in your research, it's all over my head
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 29, 2017 11:04:42 GMT -5
Hi Charlotte it is actually very easy. The tip of the Great Pyramid is a representation of "The Creator" and The Great Pyramid represents (TO ACTUAL SCALE) our solar system. It only will work for a seked 5.5 pyramid ... OR CIRCLE which I will illustrate soon. It is basically saying that "The Creator" who can easily be represented by The Sun created The Solar System which figuratively can be said to represent The Sun's universe or creation or our own solar system. The amazing thing about the 5.5 seked pyramid is that it tells us where the planets formed as the matter circled around "The Sun" or "Creator". The beauty of the 5.5 seked pyramid is also that it tells us that the first planet or Mercury formed at the point of the square root of 2 distance away from The Sun and the "last" planet formed at the "11" unit point ... Remember "The KISS" Principle" ... Nice full size image here ... Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 29, 2017 11:18:55 GMT -5
And the last but not the least comment on this is referring to this website: And this diagram: (not mine) And wouldn't you just know it that 55 x sq rt of 2 or 55 x 1.4142135624 = (and why are we not surprised ) ... 77.781746 the ratio of Mercury to Neptune. And The Right Hand (of God ?)= 40 and the other 15 to give us 2.6666666 or 11 = 8 + 3 So very nice ... Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 29, 2017 11:35:49 GMT -5
And with Neptune equalling 11 and "Ceres" equalling 1.011 we find that 11 / [sq rt of 3 x 2 x Pi] or 10.8828 and we get 11 / 10.8828 = 1.011 (1.01077)
Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 29, 2017 15:45:27 GMT -5
Okay so the giant picture is The Creator "moving" on a point of nothingness and turning it into "The Universe" or in our case our solar system. Now nature usually doesn't like sharp points so in all likelihood "The Creation Event" might have looked a bit more like this ... Again remembering the ratio is 11.0 across and 7 high or seked 5.5 . Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 29, 2017 21:25:52 GMT -5
Hi all ... computer is giving me grief and I sense that its days are numbered but we will press on. As you noticed I had posted some images of what you would see if you looked at the cone from directly over head ... you would see a series of circles and that is all. No hint of the fact that it was a cone would or could be seen by you. So in other words you would see a two-dimensional view of it but it would be filled with 3-dimensional objects. Let us assume just for a moment it is a cone ... but wait you say that is not possible, that to see it as a cone is not possible. So let us propose this then ... If it is a cone then we are only seeing it from the very top down and even if we move over and under and every which way we will still see but a series of 3-dimesnional objects moving in a circle around a sun. So what is the answer ? Where do we need to go to see this cone ? ... May I suggest that we would have to journey into the land of The Gods or The Creator, into the realm only seen by Gods, we would in other words have to move into ... THE 4TH DIMENSION ! So it is I propose that the realms of God and creator and Heaven are outside our realm of understanding as we can not ever hope to journey there, we will never be able to see the cone ... we will never be able to step outside our boundaries of 3-dimesnions and enter the 4th .... Except perhaps .... when we die ! Anyway I have drawn our Cone of Creation to scale to make it a little clearer ... enjoy. Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 29, 2017 22:07:36 GMT -5
Here are some numbers to ponder and I will lend you my "Golden Calculator" until next time. Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 30, 2017 8:12:09 GMT -5
Posted at Ma'at:From Wiki and common elements of The Egyptian creation myths ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egyptian_creation_mythsGiven that this "benben" appears to be a common element in the "myths" and is said to have been in a pyramid shape I wonder why no Egyptologist is curious as to what angle this "benben" might have had. I now contend that it is seked 5.5 and the reason is that it shows the relationship of the planets in their proper ratio. This is why seked 5.5 was used at these locations: Giza: G 3a G 1c G 1a Niuserre @ Abusir Menkare @ Giza Snefu @ Meidum Khufu @ Giza Since The "benben" figured so strongly in their creation beliefs why is it so far fetched to think that Imhotep might have decided to build a representation of it ? The other common seked was 5.25 which gives us the 3, 4 5 right angled triangle, showing the actual creation itself ...found at: Userkaf @ Saqqara Pepi 1 @ Saqqara Teti @ Saqqara Djedkare @ Saqqara Pepi II @ Saqqara Khafre @ Giza There is no REASONABLE explanation given by the orthodox on why these ratios were used. Since the majority of Egyptologist claim that the pyramids are tombs the actual shape of the pyramid surely held some major significance in the master plan. IF THEY WERE TOMBS then the actual shape of the pyramid. was in my opinion, their "ladder" to "heaven" and the afterlife with the "Gods". Therefore the shape of their ladder had to have been "set in stone" so to speak and held the greatest of significance. I contend it is "The Angle of Creation" or at least a visual representation of it and that is why these sekeds were chosen. Seked 5.5 and 5.25 were and still are a visual representation of The Creation and what was created. No shafts need apply here. If you have a better explanation for these two sekeds by all means lets hear them. Cheers Don Barone
|
|