|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 14, 2017 17:28:01 GMT -5
Hi all a quaint interesting post for this Mother's Day. I had gone in search for the average height of men and women in Ancient Egypt as a solution to something else I am working on and came across this ... Quote: Nevertheless, over this whole period they found that the mean height (of their sample of 150 skeletons) was 157.5 cm (or 5ft 2in) for women and 167.9cm (or 5ft 6in) for men, quite like today. What is quite different is that compared with the average difference of 12-13cm between men and women found in modern populations, in ancient Egypt it was only 10.4cm. This came as a surprise to the researchers, as men in ancient Egypt were thought to have benefited more (than would be so today) from preferential access to food and healthcare. But their findings probably reflect the fact that the status of women in ancient Egypt was relatively high compared to other ancient societies. ... End of quote ... Taken from this web siteNow immediately I recognized the significance of 157.5 as I knew it was the number that evenly divided into the width of The Giza Plateau of 1417.5 cubits exactly 9 times BUT I ALSO KNEW that the width of the Giza Plateau multiplied by 9 gave us the diameter of the Earth in kilometres. So what does this mean ... well simply stated it says that the average height of a woman in Ancient Egypt of The IVth Dynasty of 157.5 cm x 9 squared or 81 gives us the diameter of The Earth almost precisely in a 1 cm to 1 kilometre ratio ... 157.5 x 81 = 12757.5 (agreed upon diameter = 12756.28) Now that is bound to cheer up feminists everywhere !  1881 ... Hmmmm Happy Mother's Day to all ! Don Barone |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 14, 2017 18:37:20 GMT -5
Hi all ... well I should know betters than to let my brain go into uncharted territory but once there I can't pull it back ... case in point that apparently innocent observation on the height of a woman ... but it has led me to consider what The Giza Plateau really may be. Oh I don't have to forget my solar system or my universe or the creation but there is one thing I had totally forgotten to consider ... but first the clues .... 1) In the width of Giza the height of an average woman times 9 yields the precise result in a ratio of 1 cm = 1 cubit (9 x 157.5 = 1417.5 cm) 2) If we allow width of 1417.5 cubits to equal woman then man is equal to the distance from the centre of G1 to base of G3 as 9 x 167.9 = 1511.1)  But it gets a touch better than that for if we take the result of the findings we have woman at 157.5 cm and man at 167.9 cm ... now because it is what I do I decided to see what the ratio of these two were and dividing 167.9 by 157.5 gives us 1.066 while difference between G1 and g2 gives us 1.071. 1.071 x 157.5 = 168.7 or out about 3/4 of an inch ... So on top of everything could it also be ... a .... TEMPLE TO MAN !
Would seem to make sense as we have been taught "he" is within us all and I have certainly proved that if this is indeed a Temple to Man then I have found an awful lot of things hiding within us ... Cheers Don Barone |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 14, 2017 19:04:22 GMT -5
So ...
Square root of 3 = Man = G1
Phi = Woman = G2 = Base of Giza Rectangle
Hmmmm ...
Cheers
Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 14, 2017 19:24:47 GMT -5
Maybe it's in the ratios ... Ratio of G1 (Man) and Pi and sq rt 3 = or 5.5 / 7 = 0.7857142857143 Ratio of G2 (Woman) and Phi or 3 / 4 = 0.75 Added together they give us 1.535714286 Diameter of Earth = 12756.28 kilometres 12756.28 divided by 1.535714286 = 8306.41 which equals 2 times the base of G3 @ 4153.2 .... So G3 = Man + Woman divided into (the diameter of) Earth = Twins (4153.2 x 2) So G3 = Twins ! Osiris and Isis ? Very interesting  Cheers Don Barone . |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 14, 2017 19:46:36 GMT -5
Okay going the extra mile ....
G1 = Man = Earth = Geb
G2 = Woman = Sky = Nut
G3 = Twins = Osiris and Isis or Set and Nepthys (or maybe two sets of twins ? )
Possible ...
Cheers
Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 14, 2017 21:31:37 GMT -5
A few additional observations ...
Diameter of Mother Earth is 12756.28 kilometres
Ratio for The Great Pyramid is 7 / 11
12756.28 x .711 = 9069.715 . number of inches in the side of The Great Pyramid ....
============================================================================================
Diameter of Earth is 12756.28 kilometres
Ratio for The Great Pyramid is 7 / 11
12756.28 / 7 and then x 11 = 20045.58 OR PRECISELY 100 TIMES THE BASE OF G3 (in cubits) ...
============================================================================================
Diameter of Venus is 12103.6 kilometres
Ratio for bottom portion of The Bent Pyramid is 0.7 ( can The Bent Pyramid be showing us Venus ? )
12,103.6 x .7 = 8472.52 or basically precisely the base of G2 in inches ...
============================================================================================
That's all for now ...
Cheers
Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 15, 2017 11:32:11 GMT -5
Hi all ... well I have been exploring the possibility that The Giza Rectangle among all the other things I have found may also be a Temple to Man. I had noted that the average height of a woman in ancient Egypt was 157.5 cm and I found that this was amazing since this number multiplied by 9 gave us 1417.5 cm which equals the number of cubits in the width of The Giza Rectangle of 1417.5 cubits. Then when I checked the height of man in relation to this I realized that man times 9 equalled about 1512 cm or cubits and I suddenly realized that this indeed could be a Temple to Man. Here is the image ... Now I don't know about you but I have always been curious why a cubit used to be 18 inches but then reverted to a Royal Cubit of 20.62 inches. I think I may have an inkling to how this happened and why ... The canon or scale in Ancient Egypt seems to have always been 18. That is, the height of a man was usually drawn to scale as 18 units ... Since The Giza Plateau is very old I had to find an image of that time to test out a theory I held. But first, since we have decided that from the centre of G1 to the base of G3 as in our drawing above was man it also had to equal 18 units. So if 18 = Man = 1512 cubits what then did 1732.5 cubits equal ? Well doing some simple math we find 1512 / 18 = 84, so were we to divide 1732.5 by 84 it would give us the overall "height" or vertical distance of The Giza Plateau in units and we get ... 1732.5 / 84 and we get astonishingly exactly 20.625 units So as always here at Giza we find the regular cubit as shown by man and the orange line and the cubit is shown as the overall height ... observe ... EDIT; PLEASE NOTE THAT IN THE DIAGRAM IT SHOULD OF COURSE BE 20.625. WILL CHANGE IT WHEN I HAVE TIME  Nice pretty pictures but why was it called a "Royal Cubit" ? It obviously had to do with royalty but what ? What was different between the common man and The Pharaoh ? ... and then I had a thought and put these images together. I went and tried to find an appropriate image from the correct time of The 3rd and 4th Dynasty ... observe the reason that it was called "The Royal Cubit"   So it would appear that maybe The Royal Cubit was royal because it showed the height of the Pharaoh ... WEARING THE CROWN !!!!!!!!! Well it is a possibility ... What do you think ? Here is a grid diagram ...  Cheers Don Barone |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 15, 2017 11:58:45 GMT -5
Okay a little better clarification ... 1512 cubits represents Man and also 18 units in the canon of Egypt and also "THE COMMON CUBIT". 1732.5 cubits represents Pharaoh (including his crown) 20.625 units and also "THE ROYAL CUBIT" Nice when it all comes together like this ...  Cheers Don Barone |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 15, 2017 13:09:28 GMT -5
And an image showing "Woman":  NOTE: I have horizontally flipped the image of The Giza Plateau ! Cheers Don Barone |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 15, 2017 19:29:44 GMT -5
Just for you entertainment ... an old image updated to fit perfectly ... Adding up all the heights and all the bases of the three pyramids at Giza gives us the vertical distance of 1732.50 cubits ... Now really a co-incidence ?  Cheers Don Barone |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 15, 2017 19:39:44 GMT -5
Just playing with some numbers and saw this ....
If we allow 1732.50 to equal cubits units of 20.625 a unit or an inch equals 84 (1732.50 / 20.625 = 84)
9 x 84 = 756 and number of feet in base of The Great Pyramid.
If we call 756 or base of The Great Pyramid = Man and = 18 units then
20.625 units = (756 / 18 or 42) x 20.625 and gives us 866.25 or exactly 1/2 of our long side of 1732.50
Cheers
DB
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 15, 2017 21:02:29 GMT -5
Hi all while going through some images I chanced upon this one where I attempted to try to figure out a formula for finding the ratio of the distance to Ceres compared to the semi major axis of Mercury and Neptune. Here is that image ...  Upon looking at the image I was struck with the number 622 and wondered why it had not rung a bell earlier but that is for a bit later. The first thing I decided to do was calculate the diagonal and got this drawing ...  I couldn't help but notice that when one multiplies the diagonal by 4 one gets the base of G1 that is needed to precisely to solve for Pi. But the image was not correct, it was out of square so I decided to clean it up and here is what I got ...  I also re-checked on the semi major axis of Neptune and found that is was 30.110387 AU or 30.110387 x 149597870.7 and got 4,504,449,781.2 and found that the ratio between Mercury and Neptune was now 4,504,449,781.2 / 57,909,050 = 77.785 and lo and behold when we solved for the diagonal this time we get precisely 110 and for the perimeter of the square or diamond 440 !  And thus once again The Great Pyramid is telling us things if only we know where to look ... base of 440 / 5 = 88 = Orbital period of Mercury in Earth days diagonal using base of 440 / 8 = 77.785 = the ratio of the distance in kilometres to Neptune (.... THE 8TH PLANET !) using distance to Mercury as 1 .... Nice ! Cheers Don Barone |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 15, 2017 21:17:17 GMT -5
And a very nice addendum to this post ... I noticed that the answers seemed to be following the Fibonacci series as we had used 5 and 8 so of course I had to try 13. Well I multiplied it first (440 x 13 = 5720) but could not see anything and then I divided 440 by 13 and got nothing but then honestly folks you are not going to believe this one ...
As you know I have long claimed that The Great Pyramid is definitely showing us Mercury and this may make believers out of those on the fence for when we divide the DIAGONAL of The Great Pyramid of 625.254 cubits by 13 we get ... 47.866 AND UNBELIEVABLY EVEN TO ME THE SPEED OF MERCURY AS IT WHIPS THROUGH THE HEAVENS IS 47.866 (Average orbital speed: 47.87 km/s)
I MEAN REALLY THIS IS FREAKY ....
Cheers
Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 15, 2017 21:28:21 GMT -5
Okay ... are we on a roll I wonder ?
Let's go with 440 again and this time square 440 to get 193600 now let's double this which would be out next step toward figuring out the diagonal and we get 387200 okay let's go back to our number 13 again and this time we will divide 387200 / 13 = 29784.62
Doesn't look like much does it but what do you say we divide by 1000 and that leaves us 29.785 and ... well I will just post it
Average orbital speed of Earth: 29.783 km/s
Wow ...
Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 16, 2017 9:27:54 GMT -5
Damn I did it again. A nice long post and I closed the window by accident ... okay take two It seems that this thread has developed into a potpourri of ideas and so it was that while scanning the internet looking for the origins of The Royal Cubit I chanced upon an article by the late Clive Ross where he was trying to show the relationships to the two cubits 24 and 28 inches and to Earth and Mars. Here are the images ...   Now Clive had some brilliant ideas but he didn't always double check his work and this is a case in point. he used 24, 28 and 36.88 to show a relationship between Earth at 24 and Mars at 36.88 for a ratio of 36.88 / 24 or 1.53667 . The actual relationship between Mars and Earth is 227,939,100 / 149,598,261 or 1.5236748 a huge discrepancy when we are dealing with astronomical distances. I tried to fit in 20.62 and 18 but when I solved for 1.5236748 I ended up with 17.96 for the 18 inch side and that is not quite good enough but then I happened to multiply the ratio of Mars to Earth which is 1 / 1.5236748 and got 0.65631 times Pi and got 2.06185 which was about 1/10th of a cubit in inches so we get this Earth ------ x 10 then times Pi = number of inches in a cubit .. Mars Or another way to look at it ...  Cheers Don Barone |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 16, 2017 10:28:49 GMT -5
Okay back to "The Temple of Man" ... Interestingly enough I have come to the conclusion that it was not 'Man" that was the base unit but .... "WOMAN" ! but along with that goes our ever present ratio of 9 by 11 ... the true ratio of creation shown beautifully at Giza ... but let's press on and prove my point ... As you read earlier the the average height of a woman in Ancient Egypt in The IVth Dynasty as 157.5 cm and if we multiply that by 9 we get 1417.5 or the number of cubits in the base of our Giza Rectangle ... See below ...  Okay so now for the origin of "The Royal Cubit" according to Don. "Woman" was 9 so if we divide 157.5 by 9 we get 17.5 and times 11 gives us 192.5 ... Okay so if woman was 157.5 man was as shown in the article 167.9 or let's round it to 168 ... So "Man" was the bases of the original cubit of 18 units and woman was 168 / 157.5 = 1.0666 and divided into 18 gives us 16.875. So ... Man = 18 inches and original cubit Woman = 16.875 inches But what of 192.5 and our 11 unit ? Well it can only be one thing ... IT HAS TO BE THE ROYAL CUBIT !!!!!!! And we have "Woman" at 157.5 / 9 to get 17.5 x 11 = 192.5 But "Man" is 18 units and 168 so one unit is 9.33333 divided into 192.5 gives us .... 20.625 AND THE ROYAL CUBIT and so we have finally: "Woman" at 157.5 and 9 units and 16.875 units "Man" at 168 and 9.6 units and 18 units and original cubit "Pharaoh" and 11 units and ... 20.625 and "The Royal Cubit" !  Cheers Don Barone |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 16, 2017 10:55:08 GMT -5
Well it is said that nothing gets in the way of a good theory faster and more devastatingly than ... FACTS !
Well for my diagram to work I would need 1417.5 x 20.625 = 29235.9375 and squared we get 854740041.5 and the vertical we would get 1732.5 x 20.625 = 35732.8125 and squared we get 1276833889.2 so to figure out the diagonal we simply add these two numbers together and get the square root so answer is square root of 2131573930.66 or 46,169 inches ...
Well now what is so devastating about that ? Well both Petrie and Dash have the diagonal at 46150.6 inches and that is an error of almost 19 inches and I am afraid that can not fit the data ... I still think I am correct I just need a better reason why it is 20.62 and not 20.625 ... I am still convinced it has to do with the height of The Pharaoh wearing his crown as compared to either the height of Man or the height of Woman
Cheers
Don Barone
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 16, 2017 11:18:43 GMT -5
AAAARRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH ... Frustrating ... I have anotehr idea however ... after playing with all manner of possibilities ... We know that diagonal is 46150.6 as both Dash and Petrie agree on this ... So 46150.6 squared is 2129877880.36 ... I am also almost certain that the base is 1417.5 x 20.62 or 29228.85 inches or squared we get 854325672.3225 ... subtracting the two we get 2129877880.36 - 854325672.3225 and square root of this = 35714.874 inches ... so what do you suppose I get when I divide 35714.874 / 20.62 =  ?? Well we get 1732.0501341 or 1000 x the square root of 3 to an accuracy of 0.9999996 Interesting .. Cheers Don Barone |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 16, 2017 12:17:54 GMT -5
Okay one last try to make it fit ... We know 46150.6 is correct for the diagonal so lets use 1417.476 for the base and thus our Woman would be 1417.476 / 9 = 157.4973 Now we have calculated that 1000 times sq rt of 3 is the number of cubits in the vertical or 1732.05 cubits ... Now let's supposed that this distance is supposed to equal 20.62 cubits ... Each cubit would equal 83.998 and Man would be 18 x 83.998 and be 1511.97 and woman would be 16.875 x 83.998 = 1417.476 remembering that when we added rotation period of Mars and Earth we got 1 Mars plus two Earths gave us 686.98 + 365.25 +365.25 = 1417.48 ! So we have 1732.05 / 20.62 (Pharaoh or The Royal Cubit) = 83.99855 (ideal would equal 84) So then we have Man at 18 x 83.99855 = 1511.97 (actual would be 1732.05 - 220 = 1512.05 (out 8/100ths of a cubit or about 1.6 inches ... And last we have Woman at 16.875 x 83.998 = 1417.47 Not a bad fit ...  Looks good for now ... Cheers Don Barone |
|
