|
|
Post by Don Barone on Oct 22, 2009 18:58:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Oct 23, 2009 11:35:51 GMT -5
So that's where you spend all your time! Seems like the tide is coming in and up again. My cat Schlimpi communicated with me all the time. When she heard my footsteps I heard her miauing happily, and every time I spoke to her she answered in cat language, understandable when you put your mind in "catness" mode. Perhaps you're suggesting that the Sphinx hath been channeling you, though unlike the Greek Sphinx, the Giza Sphinx is mute. All I know is that when I gazed upon the serene Face as steeped in its own mystery, of the Creature, the thought that all Mysteries are contained within the Mystery it is to most of us, conceived me. Please don't keep us in suspence too long. Love Charlotte |
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 20, 2010 8:22:36 GMT -5
Some people are not quite getting it so I will try again. Whether I use kilometers or inches or quatloops the ratios are what is important so allow me to graphically illustrate. Here is a page from my earlier work:  So we will not use kilometers but will use a new measurement called a "Warwick" It is equal to 2.763 kilometers so the total distance for all the diameters = 400744.08 / 2.763 = 145039.48 Warwicks However we have to change Earth's diameter to Warwicks as well and so have to divide 12756.28 by 2.763 and we get 4616.82 WarwicksWhat will never change is the fact that the ratio of Pi is constant and will always equal 3.14159 and now down to the meat and potatoes of this post. So now we will divide 145039.48 Warwicks by 10 and we will get 14503.948 Warwicks and if we divide by Pi we get 4616.75 WarwicksSo we can conclude that the "creator" or the creation of our Solar System built in a proof of the intelligence of it's design so that if one adds up all the diameters of the planets in whatever measurement one could devise the resulting answer will show that the circumference of the Earth is EXACTLY 1/10 the size of all the planets diameters added together. and that folks is no co-incidence. Carrying onward it really doesn't matter what measurements are used for it is all in the ratio. However I have shown that The Ancient Egyptian Cubit was based on the speed of gravity and so it is not arbitrary at all as a kilometer has a relationship to 3.93641 (or The Giza Grid) which I concluded was 39.37 (+ or -) [ actual is (square root of 3 x 100) divided by 44 or 39.3648 ] The proof of all of this is in this simple diagram which shows that using Mercury as a base unit and calling it a "Ma'at" the distance to Mars would then equal 3.936458 "Ma'ats"  and the final beauty of this is that when one divides the total distance from the south side of G3 and measures directly N-S to the North side of G1 we find that we get 1732.05 (cubits) (+ or -) and then taking the most prominent feature of The Giza Plateau, The Great Pyramid and dividing it's base length into this distance we find that we get, and this can not be disputed and does not matter what measurements are used, The Great Pyramid's base length is in a ratio of 1:3.936458 to the overall distance N-S of The Giza Plateau ... So we might conclude that the base of The Great Pyramid represents Mercury or at least maybe the distance of Mercury from The Sun and the overall length represents Mars or the distance to it from The Sun .... Yes folks "THE CREATOR" is and was a mathematician and The Ancient Egyptians knew it ! Best Don Barone |
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Apr 20, 2010 20:33:46 GMT -5
See, if you use Warwicks you can calculate correct Ma'ats and still leave bofl baffled.
Amazing measurements and ratios you came up with here, best I like that the base of the base of the Great Pyramis represents Mercury or at least maybe the distance of Mercury from the Sun, as the GP is called a "Resurrection Machine" and Mercury the facilitator. I don't like the term "Machine" here, but do like the color you gave Mercury.
The Omniscient Creator
Cheers Don!
Charlotte
|
|
