Can The Angles at Giza Tell Us A Story ?

[Don Barone]

Hi all the road to these present conclusions led to many dead ends and incorporated both old and new discoveries . It has led from The Bent Pyramid back to Giza and many places in between and always that nagging checking perfectly with what is observed in Our Solar System . It is extremely complicated, not the math but my circuitus route to arrive at what could be a rather startling conclusion. To those that refuse to budge from their box of coincidence don't bother reading this for your conclusion, as always will be, it is all just one enormous collection of coincidences.

Enjoy

[Don Barone]

This story really begins with Clive Ross now sadly passed and his unwavering belief that Giza was an ancient Book of Astronomy. Because of him and only because of him I embarked on my studies . One of his early discoveries was one I have spent a good deal of time on and that was his conclusion that the angles formed at Giza were showing us the relationship between the orbits of Earth and Mars. Here is his original early drawings. Please note that this image is copyrighted to the estate of Clive Ross.



Recently I have posted convincing evidence that he was correct and the angle found at both Giza and The Bent Pyramid were showing us this . Here is my final diagram of my conclusions at The Bent Pyramid.



But something had been driving me to despair for a very long time, in fact since Clive first introduced this concept. Why was the deflection angle 43.38111 and not the inverse of 46.6189

If it was it would have mimicked The Bent Pyramid perfectly but it doesn't. The angle of deflection is correct but on the wrong side. I kept wondering why and now I think I know.

[Don Barone]

Sometimes I really honestly feel like little Alice . I am still curious after 70 years, I still ask questions and I still search for the answers of why when most can't even conceive of the question.

So with our success of showing that Mars' orbit was shown at Giza I asked myself what would finding the other planets in the same way show us at Giza. I then repeated our exercise with Earth of 360° for Mercury and Venus.

So 365.25/88 = 4.150568 x 360 and got 1494. Not very useful. Next came Venus with 365.25/224.7 = 1.62543 x 360 = 585.155 and again not very useful so then I decided, not really sure where these ideas come from, to use Mercury as the circle and not Earth. It is always very interesting how one little idea is like pulling your thumb out of the dike.

I am going to include my notes on this but I have to emphasize that in front of me now are pages and pages of scrap drawings and calculations. These conclusions come through hard work and deep thoughts and many rough notes and ideas that do not pan out.

So here are the notes





Now another might have rested there and said "Gee that is close but I don't believe that the builders would have been content with "close". This was not horseshoes, this was a monument that was supposed to last for a very, very long time and close would never have cut it.

So then never satisfied unless it closes perfectly I went in this direction.





But there was one more explanation to consider ...

[Don Barone]

And for those in the audience who are wondering why would we double it I refer you to the fact that Mercury is in a 2 to three ratio so for every two rotations or years Mercury has 3 days, that is it rotates three times in two years. So each year it rotates 1 1/2 times . So many sacred Ancient Egyptian numbers to be found.

But as opposed to our shifting axis theory what if Mercury's year was not always 87.9791 days ... What if for example it was say 88.02 ?



HOWEVER ...

If we use our new established True North Point as of 4550 years ago the angle would not be 44.01 but more than likely 43.98955°

[Don Barone]

So now I think it is fair to announce that The Ancient Builders, be they The Gods or The Children of The Gods and Humans (The Giants ?) used Giza for many, many reasons, least of it showing the orbital periods of The Planets and lest it be forgotten so is and was The Bent Pyramid. Showing us Mars and Mercury

Amen

[Don Barone]

But we have not completed the story yet











So now where are we going to place our pyramids ? More to the point - where did THEY place them and why ?

[Don Barone]

As usual the final definitive proof is just out of reach of my outstretched hand. We have three possibilities.

1) The distances from G1 to G2 and from G2 to G3 are in the ratio of ✓3 to Phi or 1.070466269

Or

2) The distance between G2 and G3 is 1/2 Venus but represented by 1 and distance G2 to G1 is the ratio of Venus (represented by 2 ) and Mercury.

This image will make it clearer





But the problem is that the distances measured don't agree with either one.

The first one yields

19168.4/17873.2 and = 1.072466039

While the revised distances image yields

19169.07/17875.09 and = 1.072390125

Close but no cigar . Further compounding the problem is why 929.607 and 866.05 cubits although 866.05 is tantalizingly close to one half ✓3

The search goes on

HOWEVER

If we allow Venus to equal 108,000,000 kilometers the image and Giza closes perfectly.

108,000,000 / 2 = 54,000,000

Mercury is 57,909,050

57,909,050 / 54,000,000 = 1.072389815

19169.07 / 1.072389815 = 17875.03

Checking for 6/100ths of an inch

Sadly it works out to

929.635 cubits and
866.88 cubis

It's there somewhere I just have to find it

[Don Barone]

Okay because I am the curious sort I wanted to know why 108,000,000 fit so precisely on the Giza Plateau. Could it be that 108,000,000 kilometers equal 180,000,000,000 meters and this equals
4251968503937.01 inches and lo and behold this equals 206206038018.284 cubits .

So the Ancient Builders called the distance to Venus 206,200,000,000 cubits or 2,062,000,000 rods or 10,310,000 River Units . This would make distance G2 to G3 103,100,000,000 cubits and G2 to G1 110,563,421,900

Not sure how this helps but it was interesting.

By the way 206,200,000,000 cubits equals ...

20.62 x 20.62 = 425.1844 and multiplied by 0.0254 to get meters and we get ... 10.79968376 or 107,996,837,600 and checks for 0.99997


Got to keep thinking cubits and ratios

[Don Barone]

And a final image to think on as I call it a day

[Don Barone]

The ratio is perfect but I am still working on why they chose those particular distances from G2. Can't seem to make anything fit

19168.4 = 929.6 cubits

and

17873.2 = 866.79 cubits


EXCEPT

Earth is 149,598,261 kilometers from The Sun on average and this converts to

149,598,261 / 1.609344

and this gives us

92956049.8 miles (929.60233)


But do we really want to go there ?

It is the only thing that has worked so far and it is awfully close.

[Don Barone]

Interesting things from Ancient Egypt.

Semi major axis of Venus = 206,200,000 cubits

Diameter of The Moon = 6633000 cubits

Interesting ...

So Thoth as The Moon could be represented by 2/3 + 1/3

Thrice great ?

Or how about Thoth as Mercury with it's 2 orbits to it's 3 days ...

Ratio 2 to 3

and with it's 1 day but 1 of three to make 2/3rds

But they couldn't have known ... could they ?

1 meter 1.90(925)(repeated)

Allowing Venus as 108,000,000,000 meters

and

Moon as 6633000 cubits

[Don Barone]

It still troubles me that 440/411 (G1 and G2 in cubits) are in the ratio of ✓3 to Phi to accuracy of 0.999913

Yet the diagonals agree with 1/2 Venus to Mercury virtually exactly

Could it be possible that they are showing us ... BOTH ?

Here is the revised corrected measurements for Giza and the explanation of why the changes were made.



And a drawing I did of The Giza Plateau.

Remember I didn't fudge this data I only interpret what is there.

It is a tragedy of Ancient Egypt that no one else has the courage to do the same.

And for those who cry "coincidence" do you honestly really believe that this many coincidences could occur at random ?

[Don Barone]

A very long time ago back in 1963 when I had my first highschool science class we were not allowed to use Pi to do our calculations we used ... and sadly very few people remember this, we used what was referred to as EGYPTIAN PI !

This was simply 22/7

No one questioned the teacher, he simply stated this is what they used in Ancient Egypt.

I wish now I could go back and ask him ... who told him or where did he read that 22/7 was what The Egyptians used

It certainly explains much and from now on my calculations will be in cubits only and Pi will be what The Egyptians used ... 22/7

I have a feeling a lot of things are going to work out.


For example 220 x 2 x 22/7 = 1382.857143

440 x 4 = perimeter of 1760

Ratio is perfect if and only if they used 22/7 AND NOT 3.14159265358979 and on and on forever

Makes total sense now

[Don Barone]

And here is Venus often, no make that always overlooked.

The math is solid, the conclusion obvious



And just a quick refresher to those who might be new to my work . From the center of the east base of G1 to the center of the western face of G3 is precisely 2000 cubits of 20.62 inches

and

From the western projection of G3 to western face of G2 is precisely 353.5534 cubits which is 1/4 of the ✓2 / 4 then times 1000

and

From the western projection north of G3 to center of G2 is PRECISELY ✓5 / 4

Now how about those coincidences

Looking for a message from The Gods or Aliens ? I might suggest you study Giza and the other pyramids as well OR just keep telling yourself these are just coincidences ... all 1,000,000 of them

The data ... the conclusion again is obvious

[Don Barone]

But I have been saying for years that Giza is all about 1, 2 and ✓5 and ✓2, ✓3 and ✓5

Well we have found

✓2/4 x 1000 = 353.5534 cubits

✓5/4 x 1000 = 559.017

But where oh where was

✓3/4 x 1000 = 433.013 ?

Well I think when I show you where it is you will have to become a believer for the chances of these positions being purely random is ludicrous

The exhibit



And people wonder why I believe Clive Ross has been right all along.

[Don Barone]

Adding two more square roots . 6 and 7 are there as well.



The beauty of Giza is that you are never done finding stuff.

[Don Barone]

And then we have this.

I had earlier done a treatment on this but I see now I made an error.

This is a simple way to find the three inner planets and their ratio to an amazing degree of accuracy and then next I will show you what Nick L discovered. He found Mars in an amazing bit of deduction. If not for him I don't think I would have found it. But that is for tomorrow. May I present The KISS Giza Rectangle