|
Post by Don Barone on May 2, 2018 9:25:03 GMT -5
Trying to prove G2 Petrie says: So Petrie has declared with an almsot certainty that the original entrance exited at the 19th course ... Here are his measurements for the 19th course: Red line is marking 20th course. So we have the top of the entrance at 752.8 from pavement or base. The base of The Great Pyramid has four answer ... We will take the 9068.9968 and the pi angle first ... We have 752.8 and thus the short side would equal 1/tan of 51.854 or 0.7854 x 752.8 and we get ... 591.25 inches which equals 28.674 cubits Base of G2 is 411.04 cubits Distance from top of entrance to far side of pyramid is 411.035 + 28.674 = 439.71 or times 20.62 gives us 9066.8 inches. Thus we can probably call this an exact match ... I remember saying very long ago that either The Great Pyramid was a template for The Giza Rectangle or The Giza Rectangle was the template for The Great Pyramid ... What do you think is correct but I am starting to believe again that there is nothing that we can find in The Giza Rectangle that we can not find in The Great Pyramid ... Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 2, 2018 9:47:45 GMT -5
Centered ... db
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 2, 2018 13:24:12 GMT -5
I was just thinking ... do we even need The Giza Rectangle ? Case in point ... Okay this is going slower than I expected as I can not seem to post the concept I discovered on my drawing on The Great Pyramid but it is easily explained. This is the way to get the correct ratio from Mercury to Mars and it's simplicity was only discovered while I was drawing things onto The Great Pyramid ... In most if not all my previous work I had assigned a value of square root of 3 for Mars ... from the 8660.25 inches of The Red to the height of The Bent we always ended up using square root of 3 to show Mars ... and now I have discovered why they did this ... Firstly we had already assigned a value of the sqaure root of 3 for G1 and 440 cubits ... so what follows is ... well sublime to say the least ... First thing we are going to do is take 440 and divide it by a thousand to give us 0.44 Then we are going to take the reciprocal of this which is 2.2727272727272727272727272727273 . Now just a side note here we also had already discovered that this times 10,000 had given us the perimeter of The Pyramid at Meidum ... Now what I am going to do is ... well inspirational even if I have to say so myself ... I am going to multiply this by the square root of 3 or 1.7320508076 and we get ... 3.9364791081111 ... Now what follows next is simply unbelievable and it all makes so much more sense as to what they were doing and what they were trying to show us for observe ... Mercury semi major axis is 57,909,050 km Mars semi major axis is 277,939,100 km 57,909,050 x 3.9364791081111 = 227,957,765.5 or semi major axis of Mars to a degree of accuracy of 0.99992 ... So without leaving The Great Pyramid we have found Mercury, Venus and Mars I stumbled onto this when I noted that in the right angled triangle that has as sides 250 and hypotenuse of 500 the longer side is 433.0127 and further noted as I was dividing up The Great Pyramid that 1/4th of the base or 110 cubits divided into 433.0127 gives us 3.9364791081111 and times 57,909,050 gives Mars of 227,957,765.5 thus is becomes obvious why the builders used square root of 3 when dealing with Mars ... But these tell a most wonderful story as well ... then then we have this ... Now as I was working out these calculations I discovered some amazing things ... First let me recap the Sumerian King List ... You will notice that The First King, The King at the very beginning, Alulim the first and therefore The Right Hand of The Creator ruled for 28000 years. Now we have looked at this and scoffed and people look at my numbers theory where I claim that The Gods were numbers and turn away well I always like vindication of my work. In the triangle created when we use 140 as the short side and 220 as the hypotenuse the resulting longer side gives us ... 169.7053 and in a coincidence to end all coincidences ... just the facts here today ... when we square this number we get ... wait for it for it is one of our best ... 28,000 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Amazing so The First King of Sumeria of The King List ruled for 220 squared - 140.00 squared or 28,800 cubits ? And always we find it at Giza ... wow ! Amazed Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 2, 2018 13:33:05 GMT -5
And a quick finale to the above ... when we multiply 220 by our Mars to Mercury ratio of 3.9364791081111 we get ... 866.025404 which is the base of The Red Pyramid in an exact 1 cubit to 10 inch ratio ... so 866.025 cubits x 10 inches = 8660.254 inches which is the precise base of The Red Pyramid in inches ...
Humbled again Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 2, 2018 13:48:13 GMT -5
Sorry and what this is telling us is that the base of The Great Pyramid of 440.00 cubits when divided by 1000 x the square root of 3 or 1732.050807 the resulting answer is the ratio of the semi major axis' of Mercury and Mars ... simply astonishing ...
Proof:
1732.0508075688773 / 440 = 3.9364791081110847580169235034224 x 57,909,050 = 227957765.5
I mean how amazing is that ... and how easy to remember as well
Really special for sure.
And always we find the answer at Giza ! ALWAYS !
Regards Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 2, 2018 14:33:07 GMT -5
Hi again all. You know what, and this isn't just a recent occurrence but I have found it hard to find Earth within my diagrams. I mean we have it in the ratio to Mercury to give us the diagonal but I have been unable other then reversing 31 /12 to get 0.387024 to really find Earth ... and then I found it on Venus . Yes I found it in the base of The Pyramid of Khafre or Venus as we have labelled it. Observe. The ratio of the average speed of the planets is Mercury 47.3616371 and Earth 29.7823 so that the ratio is 1.5902612323427. Now the ratio of Mercury to Earth is 12 to 31 So try this ... ratio of Mercury to Earth (1.5902612323427) divided by 12 (0.132521769362) and then multiply by 31 we get 4.108175 and if we multiply by 100 we get 410.8175 or base of G2. 410.8175 x 20.62 = 8471.1 or 4/5ths of an inch out ... So we have this formula: Base of G2 / ... no wait scrap that I have just found a better one ... 1/Pi x 1000 and we get 318.31 [well we have seen that one before ] now we dived by two and we get 159.1549431 now divide by 12 to give us 13.262912 x 31 gives us 411.15 and in inches this gives us 8477.9 ... one inch out But this brings up an extremely interesting point ... is the ratio of the speed of Mercury to the speed of Earth based on Pi ? Because currently we have 1.590238 and stylized we got 1.591549 So is the true ratio of the speed of these two planets based on Pi and is the ratio between the speed of these two planets 1.591549 instead of 1.590238. The only thing that could change to give us this result is the length of the year, either on Earth or of Mercury so I will look into it. Interesting as always ... Wonder what the other ratios might show us ... Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 2, 2018 15:31:22 GMT -5
Okay sometimes I feel like I am on a toboggan slope of knowledge ... As I suggest let's look at these other ratios ... Here is our chart ... So we have already done Mercury 31.1831 and we found that it was [1/Pi x 10] / 2 to give us 1.591549 Pluto gives us at it's present place 0.15914853139 and already checks to Pi to 0.099996 So let's do Venus ... 1.1758455384 and times 2 and times 10 we get 23.517 (23.5 anyone ?) Earth is 1 x 2 x 10 = 20 Nice Mars = 0.80840 x 2 x 10 = 16.1681 Jupiter = 0.4385 x 2 x 10 = 8.770223549 Saturn = 0.32056 x 2 x 10 = 6.4112307468 Uranus = 0.22877 x 2 x 10 = 4.5754637 and Neptune = 0.1827 x 2 x 10 = 3.6542 and almost precisely an Earth year in days / 100 ... But you will notice I saved Ceres for the last as this I think is quite interesting ... Ceres = 0.600645 x 2 x 10 = 12.0129 and who can not suspect that at one time or even now it was or is 12 ! Okay so the one that obviously jumps out at us is Earth being 20. Now 20 we found was the orbital time in light minutes around the orbit of Mercury and the radius was 3.1831 light minutes so I decided to try dividing all the results by this figure to see if they revealed anything ... Venus 23.517 / 3.1831 = 7.38808 Earth = 20 / 3.1831 = 6.2831854 (and of course twice Pi) Mars = 16.1681 / 3.1831 = 5.0794 Ceres = 16.168112.1029 / 3.1831 = 3.80224 Jupiter = 8.7702 / 3.1831 = 2.7552 ( and times 100 will give us the number of cubits in the base of The Pyramid at Meidum) Saturn = 6.411231 / 3.1831 = 2.0141 ( and times 100 will give us the base of G3 in cubits) Uranus = 4.5754637 / 3.1831 = 1.4374 Neptune = 3.6542 / 3.1831 = 1.1480 ... ? Pluto = 0.31829706278 / 3.183098861838 = .099996 Not a lot here but we will keep our eye on these ratios ... Only Mercury, Earth, Ceres and Pluto seem to have an obvious story to tell . regards Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 2, 2018 16:38:22 GMT -5
Mars = 0.80840 x 2 x 10 = 16.1681
28 / sq rt of 3 or 1.732050807 = you will love this ...
28 / sq rt of 3 or 1.732050807 = ... 16.165815 / 16.1681 = 0.9998
db
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 2, 2018 18:40:24 GMT -5
Seems this "God", the square root of 3 wants to get involved in everything ... wonder if that's why they called him The God of War ... So trying to figure out the planets wasn't going well so I decided to try something completely difference. I thought for a change I would give the slope distances a try ... and here is the very first one I tried ... This is pretty neat. The Great Pyramid is 280 cubits high and if we use my value for the base we get 439.823 cubit so the the half base becomes 1/2 of 439.823 = or 219.9115 ... doing the math we get the slope distance to equal 356.03521 ... now for the surprise, at least I was surprised. I decided to divide this slope distance of 365.03521 by our old friend the sq rt of 3 or 1.732050807 and what do you suppose I got ? Well I got ... 205.557 cubits and lo and behold that is one half of The Pyramid of Khafre of G2 (2 x 205.557 = 411.114 x 20.62 = 8477.2 and just 3/10ths of an inch off of the south side of G2 at 8476.9 inches as per Petrie ... Now how about that ! So it appears pretty obvious that The Goddess of War , Sekhmet was Mars and the square root of 3 And you want to hear something crazy ? I am starting to think maybe The Sphinx was the square root of 3 and maybe even Sekhmet and maybe even Mars for after all ... it was painted red ! And what of The God of War ? Here he is ... The Egyptian War God Onuris Three things on top enclosed in half a square ... square root of three maybe ? Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 2, 2018 18:47:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 2, 2018 20:40:53 GMT -5
Hi all I am formulating a comparison between The Ancient Gods of Sumerian and The Ogdoad the original 8 gods of Ancient Egypt The first one is amazingly simply ... there were 8 in each ... gets a little together after that but I am making progress. I find it amazing that all anyone ever concentrated on was The Flood. They ignored everything else and that is where we will find the answers. Stay tuned but I have to go to work for the next three days so my time on the computer will be limited, I will post what I can in the evening. I think you will enjoy it. But just a little food for thought ... Sitchin claimed Niburu returned every 3600 years ... although I do not hold that belief the number is significant. If we take the date of Gobekli Tepe we get a date of from 9130 to 7370 BCE that is 11,148 to 9388 years ago ... and dividing by 3600 we get from 3.1 to 2.61 return visits in the years 7548, 3948, 340 but that means nothing so let's start from 3100 as probably as good a date as any for outside interference. 10,300, 6700, 3100, but I like 3100 so we have: 12,400, 9300, 6200, 3100 and of course 0 all dates in years BCE 14,418, 11,318, 8,218, 5118, 2018 all these are years ago ... No matter what theory one comes up with (me in particular) it is going to be very interesting how the builders of Gobekli Tepe are added to the theory. Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 3, 2018 19:38:40 GMT -5
Hi all ... I have had a couple so this may not be as lucid or as complete as it should be. Regardless I wanted to post it as I made notes all day as I drove around, I am calling this "Our First Star Trek Post" Why would I call it this ? Simply because we are going to go ... " where no man has gone before ... " and why can we get there and do this when no one before could ? It is becasue we have a tool that the others never had ... we have a tool that is a key to unlocking many things ... we now have ... THE REAL REASON THE ROYAL CUBIT HAD 20.62 "INCHES" !!!!!!!! Look around and you will not get one logical reason why The Royal Cubit went from the common cubit of 18 "inches" to The Royal Cubit of 20.62 "inches" I am about to give you the real reason. It is not something you will find in your text books ... but hopefully eventually you might It started out innocent enough as I was still trying to make the sq rt of 3 fit into things so I decided to divide the height of The Great Pyramid with its 5773.5 "inches" height by sq rt of 3 and was amazed when I got 3333.33333 ( I should not have been as we had seem this elsewhere in one of my posts) What I did next is ... well just me ... I decided to divide 3333.33333 by 20.62 ... just to see what it would give us and the result was ... 161.655351 ,,, now normally that would have passed as unimportant and I would have shelved this line of inquiry ... BUT ... just yesterday we were playing with the ratios of the orbital speed of the planets and we had noted a number very similar to this ... here is what we found ... Mars = 0.80840 x 2 x 10 = 16.1681 It immediately caught my eye and so I decided to work a few things out ... and found that to get 16.1681 when divided into 333.33333 we would need ... 20.61673. Can anyone say "cubit" please ... Next I went to the ratio of their semi major axis' and found that the ratio was 1.5236748 and since we had introduced the cubit at 20.62 I decided to see what I would get when I multiplied 1.5236748 by 20.62. And before I post the result may I ask you all to take a deep breath and sit down for what we may be witnessing here is something very, very profound ... for when we multiply the ratio of Mars to Earth by the number of inches in a cubit ... we get .... and this is so, so, very, very neat .... we get ... 31.41817432 and PI TO AN ACCURACY OF 0.99993 SO HERE IS WHAT WE HAVE DISCOVERED HERE FRIENDS ... MARS = PI EARTH = 20.62 ... THE CUBIT There can be no other logical explanation ... but this means that whoever originated The Royal Cubit KNEW THE RATIO OF MARS TO EARTH ! Now that is real history worth studying . This unfortunately is The Cole's Note Version (look it on on Google) as I really just wanted to get it out there and will expand as time goes on ... So we now have Mars representing ... THE SQUARE ROOT OF THREE ... AND ... NOW ... PI Awesome ! But while we wait for my next post let's try to think about ... who or what was it that inspired whoever to create the THE ROYAL CUBIT WITH IT'S 20.62 "INCHES" Again I have to emphasize these ARE NOT MODERN INCHES ! These are 20.62 of the "9068.9968" "inches" created in this classic diagram of mine ... Okay so what could possible entice The Ancient Builder to use a Royal Cubit that tied Mars and Earth together so very intricately. I will be back ... db
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 4, 2018 6:05:56 GMT -5
Okay very quickly before I go to work New discoverers with Pi 1 / 10 x pi (0.031831) x 5 = 0.1591549431 RATIO OF AVERAGE ORBITAL SPEED BETWEEN PLUTO AND EARTH 1 / Pi ( 0.31831) x 5 = 1.591549431 RATIO OF AVERAGE ORBITAL SPEED BETWEEN MERCURY AND EARTH Nice and neat as promised cheers db
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 4, 2018 18:09:18 GMT -5
You know life is funny sometimes. For 19 and 1/2 years I have been using kilometers in my measurements ... THEY ARE THE WRONG MEASUREMENTS TO USE !!!!!!! I was kind of narrowing down on it on my earlier post where I questioned the kilometer but just now searching for an old diagram it hit me like a ton of bricks ... we need not go the orbital distances for the answer is in plain view for all to see IN THE MILES IN THE SEMI MAJOR AXIS. How could I have missed it ? The first so obvious ... semi major axis of Mercury 35,983,046.5084 MILES and just a whisper away from our 36,000,000 ! The second equally good ... semi major axis of Venus 67,237,911.8448 ... and now we simply multiply base of G3 by Phi to get Venus ... 6723.79 divided by Phi = 4155.5 ... amazing and my favorite although they both have been pretty good so far ... Earth at 92,955,817.4014 so very close to our 93,000,000 which when divided by our 31 gives us 3,000,000 (93 / 3 = 31) So very neat and tidy ... As a great man would say ... DOH ! I think this might be a game changer ... And now the distance between The Red Pyramid and The Bent is most probably 6723.79 FEET !!!!!!!!!! And of course dividing both Mercury at 36,000,000 and Earth at 93,000,000 by 12 and 31 respectively gives us 3,000,000 and of course the square root of 3,000,000 ... well it has to be, and it is .... 1732.05 ... 1000 x the square root of 3 Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 4, 2018 18:57:57 GMT -5
Hi all I will post a chart here that I have had for years... strange how I missed these before ... anyway let The Illumination begin: Lets do Neptune first ... so painfully nice and obvious ... 2,798,310,156,8091 again a whisper away from 280 (cubits) Uranus explanation to follow Saturn so in your face it is slapping you ... 14.412475 the percent of total is 10 times the square root of 2 ... divided into the total it is 10 times the sqaure root of 2 / 2 and 890.704144.0487 just a whisper away from a number we discovered earlier when we divided Pi into 28 and got 8.91267681 (0.9993) Jupiter just very quickly semi major axis divided into total of all semi major axis' is 13.019 % AND as a percent of total distance it is 13.045 % very close to being exactly the same ... And now to Mars ... our angry red planet ... The horizontal distance at Giza is 29233 and divided by 20.62 we get 1417.7012609 and divided by Mars at 1416.3479 gives us our same 0.9993 error ... And now for an experiment ( have not done this yet so I will see with you) . I will round Mercury up to 36,000,000 from 35,983,046 and we find that to do this we have to multiply the lower value by 1.00047116634 so now to get them all in the same scale we simply multiply them all by the same so here we go ... Mercury = 36,000,000 MILES Venus = 6723.... x 1.00047116634 = 67,269,591 MILES Earth = 92,955,817 x 1.00047116634 = 92,999,615 [ 93 ? ] Mars = 141,634,790 x 1.00047116634 = 141701523.5 [ horizontal at Giza anyone ? ] Jupiter to come Saturn (looking for 8.91) 890,704,144.0487 x 1.00047116634 = 891,123,814 (28 / Pi anyone ? ] Uranus (looking for 353.5534 sq rt of 2 / 4 then x's 1000 and found at Giza, west side of G3 to west side of G2) 1,787,485,510 x 1.00047116634 = 1,788,327,713 Nice I am sure I am going to start to find many things. Oops almost forgot Neptune ... 2,798,310,157 obviously looking for 280 ... and we get when multiplied by The First Barone Constant of 1.00047116634 = 2,799,628,626.5 ... 280 and height of The Great Pyramid anyone ? So all I did here is divided the semi major axis of Mercury into a nice even 36,000,000 and we get 1.0004711663376 ... we are going to egotistically call this ... The First Barone Constant ... 1.00047116634 Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 4, 2018 20:38:34 GMT -5
Hi all here is a post I posted at Ma'at ... wonder what they will comment if anything ... "Hi all, you brave souls who do not fear to journey to the underworld. This is going to be an explanation on why The "Inch" works perfectly at Giza and the rest of The Pyramids of Egypt as well. The first thing you have to do is try to shake off your notion of what you think an inch is. The Ancient Inch or at least "The Inch" of The Pyramid Builders was not the inch that immediately pops to mind. It is simply a number generated from the perfect square where sq rt of 2 is ... hang on let me post the picture. So much clearer ... So as you can see the number 9068.9968 is simply a number generated from the use of our three favorite numbers, sq rt of 2, sq rt of 3 and Pi. This is what The Great Pyramid is ... Aw but you are probably saying so where do the cubits fit in ... well I am glad you asked that question for the story is stranger than fiction ... many have asked where did The Royal Cubit come from, why does it measure 20.62 inches, BUT YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER THAT IT IS MADE UP OF 20.62 OF THE INCHES IN THE DIAGRAM. Well ... allow me to quote you just a bit of astronomy before I move on ... The semi major axis of Mars (just average distance from The Sun) is 227,943,824km from this link ... solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/mars/by-the-numbers/ and Earth is 149,598,262 km from this link: solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/earth/by-the-numbers/Okay so get to the point why is there 20.62 of those inches in a cubit ... well ... 227,943,824 / 149,598,262 = 1.523706 And as luck (yeah right) would have it ... 20.62 of "their" inches x 1.523706 is equal to .... 31.4188 So we have Mars = Pi Earth = 20.62 or The Cubit ... So you are probably arguing but, but, but how could they possibly know the distance to the planets ... aw ... but they didn't have to know that ... the orbital periods or time of rotation or simply a year yields the same numbers ... no doubt about it ... Mars is Pi and Earth is The ROYAL Cubit ... somehow that is so nice and fitting. A quick proof of what I say ... They would know Earth was 365.25 days or somebody would have, I don't think you are quite ready for me to tell you the whole story ... The Ancient Astronomers would also have figured out that Mars took 686.98 days. Ratio of Mars to Earth is 686.98 / 365.25 = 1.8808487 now in this number Earth is the 1 and Mars is greater by the 0.880847 To solve this all you need to know is what Kepler discovered according to him from "divine intervention" The period or ratio of days in a year ( Mars/ Earth 1.880084) squared and then cube rooted gives you the relative orbital distance of the planets ... 1.523685..Did they know this ? Well someone back then did ... and it is now a mute point on whether they were tombs or not. Call them tombs it is totally not relevant anymore for it is the size that is all important. Did the Kings choose to get buried underneath them, I guess it is possible but I still think unlikely. One thing I am now totally sure of is that being a tomb was not the reason why they were built. We are on the verge ... Regards Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 5, 2018 17:26:38 GMT -5
My second post at Ma;at ... Hello Ma'atians ... not to be confused with Martians little joke I am offering up alternative solutions to some age old concepts. They might appeal to some of you. These being: 1) The 360 degree circle was totally not about The Earth and it's number of days but had everything to do with Mercury and the fact that it's semi major axis was almost exactly 36,000,000 miles ( 35,983,046 miles) 2) The elliptical orbit of Mercury was equal to 1200 light seconds. that is a light bean would take 1200 seconds to follow the orbit. Of course 1200 seconds = 20 light minutes ! In a circle that has 20 as it's circumference it's radius is (rounded) 3.1831. I point you to my analysis of this ratio: donbarone.altervista.org/Pyramid_Secrets_Revealed_Part_IV.htmldonbarone.altervista.org/Pyramid%20IV_section_2.htmlThe 1200 light seconds came to represent the TWELVE and of course the object they were orbiting or following became of course "Jesus" in symbolic literature of the time. Again the 12 Zodiacs were representing THE TWELVE as they circled the galactic center ... "Jesus" Again in Greek and Roman mythology ... Mount Olympus was The Sun and The "Gods' were THE TWELVE And Hercules and his TWELVE labors And of course lastly THE TWELVE DISCIPLES ... and CHRIST representing this same concept It was this secret that was hidden for these many thousand of years ... there were planets revolving around The Sun ... and as I stated so many years ago, back in 1999 I believe if you were going to hide knowledge where would you hide it ... well you would hide it in large stone monuments (The Pyramids of Egypt) and hide it in religious myth ... and so it has been for these so many thousands of years ... So all this hype for God and such just window dressing, The Creator totally real and the dominant force in The Universe ... But that alone would not have been the main reason for hiding it ... no the main reason for hiding it was ... how did Ancient Man know there were planets orbiting The Sun? regards Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 6, 2018 8:29:41 GMT -5
Hi all ... with the realization that The Metric System totally hides the beauty of the make up of our solar system I have begun re-analyzing a lot of my previous work. As you can imagine it will take some time for me to work through this. An early "discovery" of mine has to do with gravity. I have noted that the gravitational force on Earth IN FEET/SECOND SQUARED is 32.174 (this is based on a metric value of 9.80665 m/s2 and gravity varies on the surface of The Earth depending where you are. As I was going to mention I have found that The gravitational force on Earth IN FEET/sec divided by 20 is equal to the ratio of the speed of Mercury (using a circular orbit) to Earth's speed .... I am using kilometers since I have not had time to transfer everything over to miles yet ... and it really doesn't matter for calculating ratios ... we get 29.78723 for Earth and 363,853,292 (circumference of 57,909,050) / 87.96907 / 24 / 60 / 60 = 47.8721095 / 29.78723 = 1.607135 x 20 = 32.14271 and this would equal 9.79711 m/sec/sqrd and basically exactly what I had calculated for the gravity on The Giza Plateau.
I have determined that the metric system completely hides the beauty of the design and workings of our solar system and especially how they relate to The Pyramids of Egypt. If you think about it all the discoveries we made have been based on the inch and ratios. I don't want to get conspiratorial here but has this been done deliberately to hide certain knowledge ? Regardless I am starting to work through the numbers again and I am certain I can prove my point, not that there was a conspiracy but that the IMPERIAL SYSTEM is the design of choice of THE CREATOR.
However then there are things like this to throw a monkey wrench into the mix ...
31,557,600 are the number of seconds in a year and interestingly (Acceleration by Earth's Gravity = 9.80665 m/s2) and 31,557,600 when equal to feet /sec/sqrd gives us 980840.2 or about g x 100,000. accuracy = 0.9998. Since gravity varies over the surface of The Earth it could be exact. Could these be connected ? Well since orbital speed and time and all these other things are intricately linked together with gravity I don't see why they coudln't be ...
Regards Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 6, 2018 8:47:09 GMT -5
Okay just a bit of a follow up on the above post. I decided to see what I would get if I used the circular orbit of Earth compared to Mercury (again using kilometers but it doesn't matter here) 149,598,261 x 2 x Pi = Circumference = 939953595.5 / 365.25 / 24 /60 / 60 = 29.7853321 57,909,050 x 2 x Pi = Circumference = 363,853,292 / 87.96907 / 24 / 60 / 60 = 47.8721095 Ratio = 47.8721095 / 29.7853321 = 1.607237731 .... AND .... If we take the reciprocal of this or 1 / 1.607237731 we get ... 0.6221855 and times 1000 gives us 622.1855 and the diagonal of The Great Pyramid with a base side of 439.951 x 20.62 to get 9071.80 inches ! On top of this 1.607237731 x 20 = 32.145 and the force of gravity on Earth in feet per second second 1 Standard Gravity to Feet Per Second Squared = 32.174Acceleration by Earth's Gravity = 9.80665 m/s232.145 / 32.174 = 0.99909 0.99909 x 9.80665 = 9.797736 regards Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 6, 2018 9:32:13 GMT -5
Not sure about this but ... 12 = Mercury and 31 = Earth Mars = ? How about the sq rt of 31 / 2 or 3.937003937006 (NOTE: an inch = 2.54 centimeters or 0.3937007874 x 10 = 3.937007874 ( 3.937007874 / 3.937003937 = 0.9999990 or one / one millionth So it appears that 31 and Earth define the ratio of centimeter to inch ... I didn't know that And 3.937003937006 x 57,909,050 = 227,988,158 checks to 227,939,100 to 0.9998 ... But how about that about 31 ... the square root of 31 / 2 equals the ratio of the centimeter to an inch ... Nice ... Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 6, 2018 10:49:20 GMT -5
and as long as we have jumped to gravity .. we have this ... gravity on Saturn is 10.44m/sec² ... but when we look at this same value in inches or in The Imperial System it tells a far better story ... for this is equal to 17.12595 x 2 or 34.25185667 feet but it is the tale of the inch that explains it all for this number of feet is equal to 411.02 and the precise value of cubits for The Pyramid of Khafre in a 1 cubit to 1 inch ratio ... now how nice is that BUT IT GET EVEN BETTER .... for if we check Neptune we find gravity at 11.17145 m/sec² ... this translates to 36.65166 feet / sec² and in inches ... well I am sure you know where this is heading ... 36.65166 x 12 = 439.82 and the precise value of inches in The Great Pyramid so again we have a 1 cubit to 1 inch ratio showing us gravity on Neptune this time. ... HOWEVER the book tells me I am wrong in calling Neptune 11.17145 they say it is 11.15 so for the time being I will defer to the books but don't be surprised if it gets revised to 11.17145. However it is a gas giant and gravity is totally based on what level a reading is taken from so my value is easily correct at a slightly lesser height ... Closer to the planet's center the higher the gravity. And of course we still have this discovery from a while ago ... A while ago a genius over at Graham's Jonny did a chart for me of some gases and the speed of sound at various temperatures. They are most illuminating ... at -40.15 degrees the speed of sound in NITROGEN is 440.0949576 ... G1 anybody ? at -40.15 degrees the speed of sound in Oxygen is 411.7773534 at minus 40 exactly we get about 412 and 440.1 extremely close to the values of G1 and G2 ... so more information from Giza ? Here is what Jonny wrote ... " ... Note that this is for ideal gases, but no gas is ideal, and the adiabatic index may change at low temperature ..." At minus 157.50 (157.5 x 9 = 1417.50) sound in Nitrogen is 310.99306 feet per second (half diagonal of G1 ? - 439.81 base ) Here is a link to the chart Jonny did for me ...Cheeers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 6, 2018 13:16:52 GMT -5
... and this back to our 31 = Earth The orbital period of The Moon is 29.530589 days. Now 365.25 / 29.530589 = 12.368530814 This number divided by Pi = 3.9370256356427 which is almost identical to our sq rt of 31/2 or 3.937003937 (0.999995) So we have 31 / 2 then square rooted and ratio of Mercury to Mars = Moon orbital period divided into Earth's orbital period divided by Pi Interesting. Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 6, 2018 13:43:30 GMT -5
And building our solar system with the numbers ... sq rt of 2 + 2 = 3.41421356237 and semi major axis of Jupiter is 778,340,821 km Now the simplified version to get there ... Nice Nicer is 0.0062 reciprocal to 161.290322581 / 12 = 13.4408602150538 x 57,909,050 = 778,347,446 778,340,821 / 778,347,446 = 0.999992 Very close to The Silver Ratio - 1 ( sq rt 2 + 1) then squared then add 1 squared then sqaure root to get 2.61312593 - 1 to get 1.61312593 x 100 to end at 161.312593 and compare to 161.2903225 and 161.30126673. Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 6, 2018 18:56:42 GMT -5
Okay I am getting some rather bizarre results here so I will post them and let you people be the judge.
First we will take the diameter of our Earth IN MILES and we get ... 7926.385
The semi major axis of Mars IN MILES = 141,663,479
Now for the oddities ...
7926.385 / 141,663,479 = 5.5952211932 and the reciprocal is 17872.394414 and times 100,000 gives us 1,787,239,441 ... semi major axis of Uranus = 1,787,485,511 and checks for 0.9998
Would have called it a fluke if it were not for this ...
7926.385 x 141,663,479 = 1122879274993.415 and reciprocal = 8.9056768814783262272469449382316e-13 and using absolute value we get 8.90567688147 and times 100,000,000 we get 890,567,688 and Saturn = 890,704,144 again checking for 0.9998
I was still willing to call it a fluke but then I got this ... I keep thinking about that first King of Sumeria who ruled for 28800 years and decided to see if a hunch I had was correct and so I divided 28800 by 7926.385 and got 3.63343441 with the reciprocal being 0.275221 and times 1000 gives us 275.221 and since this appeared to be point us to Meidum I then multiplied it by 20.62 and got ... 5675.0 and checking precisely to what Petrie had measured for the west side of The Pyramid at Meidum. Now before we dismiss this out of hand we must remember the simple fact that 10,000,000 x Pi = 31415926.536 and the sqaure root of this is 5604.9912164. When we calculate the diagonal we get 7926.6546 and extremely close to the actual of 7926.385. So there could be something going on here in regards to Pi that we just aren't seeing ... but it is extremely interesting ...
Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 6, 2018 23:46:23 GMT -5
Hi all a bit of a recap this time around because I am sure sometimes we forget how ingenious our Ancient Builders were. Case in point: The Design of The Great Pyraimd and a drone's point of view ... and lastly ... And the real beauty of this is that you can get all the results I have been getting from a side view ... AND FROM THE TOP VIEW. IT IS DESIGNED SO THAT IT TELLS THE SAME STORY SIDEWAYS AND TOP VIEW WISE ... SIMPLY AMAZING AS USUAL Now honestly ... is there anybody left who still believes this wasn't planned this way ? Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 7, 2018 7:23:51 GMT -5
Okay late last night I took another look at the point where The Queen's Chamber shafts might exit the pyramid and after checking Petrie's estimates found a completely different and I think much more logical answer. here is that progression of images ... and finally this one ... Petrie actually has two answer for where the shafts might have exited The Great Pyramid. These are 2679.1 which I have used for this diagram and 2641.3 inches. Okay so what is so special about this exit point well .... Here is the drone view again ... I will post a picture of this exact configuration occurring in Dashur after a coffee Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 7, 2018 9:23:50 GMT -5
Okay in keeping with our theory that all the pyramids are interconnected and are showing the same things but in just slightly different ways may I present this image for your examination: and from our drone ... Okay something has to be understood with this pyramid. The angles keep changing. There are only a couple of things that could account for this. Shoddy workmanship (not likely) or the fact that the decreasing angles of the sides are meant to reflect the tangents that would be produced as they are drawn to an arc or circle. Because of this fact there and many possible answers to what is actually meant with this pyramid and it is impossible to say which is the correct one. I think they designed it that way on purpose. To keep us looking . And now back to The Great Pyramid for just a while. Observe ... Images removed because they were wrong Regards Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 7, 2018 10:25:26 GMT -5
But I don't think the builders are quite done with us yet. Case in point this image ... Now I once held the belief that every stone and every course was telling us a story. Even did a web page on it ... But I was just looking at course 200 and trying to figure out what their intentions might have been for this landmark level. At the 64 level they gave us 2062 inches or precisely 100 cubits so I thought maybe something similar was hidden here. I could find nothing of significance at the 100 course level ... But here is what I may have found at the 200 course level. Course 200 is 5385.7 inches from the pavement or 261.18817 cubits and I thought Phi squared might have been meant but it was too far off. I was thinking Mars so I decided to take square root of 261.18817 and got 16.161317 and wouldn't you just go figure this number has been popping up all over the place. If you don't remember allow me to divide by 2 then 10 (20) and we get ... 0.80806585 AND THE ORBITAL RATIO OF SPEED OF MARS TO EARTH IS EARTH 1 MARS 0.808404 Checks to about 0.80806585 / 0.808404 or 0.9996 and a distinct possibility. If we take 5385.7 as 1.80806585 we get 1 equal to 5385.7 / 1.80806585 = 2978.7 and not a major number in the course. Course 98 is 2984.2 but that's as close as it gets. db
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 7, 2018 10:55:09 GMT -5
Okay all ... as was once said ... Houston we have a problem. It is concerning Mercury. According to all accounts and calculations Mercury and Earth are in a ratio of 87.96907 days / 365.25 days = (A)0.24084618754278 ... The semi major axis = 57,909,050 / 149,598,261 = (B) 0.38709708 According to Kepler (A)squared then cube rooted = (B) so we have (A)0.2408461875427 squared which equals 0.058006886054 and then if we find the cube root of this we get 0.38710298. According to this formula if we take the reciprocal of 0.38710298 or 2.5832919 or really simply the ratio of the two of them and get the square root of these we get the relative orbital speed ... of 1.607262238 HOWEVER THIS IS NOT WHAT WE GET WHEN WE ACTUALLY MEASURE IT ... We get as I have posted earlier 1.590237936 ... So where does that leave us ... well for some reason the answers are not checking ... the others are out a bit but nothing this alarming and what makes it so intriguing is that the result we do get works perfectly ... IF MERCURY IS IN A CIRCULAR ORBIT. For when one calculates the speed of Mercury using it's circular orbit (just fictitious because all orbits are elliptical) then it checks almost exactly. I have no idea at the moment why this is so ... I will consult NASA regards Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 7, 2018 11:29:34 GMT -5
Okay in keeping with our theory that all the pyramids are interconnected and are showing the same things but in just slightly different ways may I present this image for your examination: and from our drone ... Okay something has to be understood with this pyramid. The angles keep changing. There are only a couple of things that could account for this. Shoddy workmanship (not likely) or the fact that the decreasing angles of the sides are meant to reflect the tangents that would be produced as they are drawn to an arc or circle. Because of this fact there and many possible answers to what is actually meant with this pyramid and it is impossible to say which is the correct one. I think they designed it that way on purpose. To keep us looking . And now back to The Great Pyramid for just a while. Observe ... This is going to ... well just take a look. This is simply astounding ... Images removed due to being simply wrong Regards Don Barone Oh drat ... the last couple of images in this diagram are wrong ... I will try to fix them ...
|
|