|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 25, 2018 16:18:05 GMT -5
... and more on Kepler.
The ideas that Kepler would pursue for the rest of his life were already present in his first work, Mysterium cosmographicum (1596; “Cosmographic Mystery”). In 1595, while teaching a class at a small Lutheran school in Graz, Austria, Kepler experienced a moment of illumination. It struck him suddenly that the spacing among the six Copernican planets might be explained by circumscribing and inscribing each orbit with one of the five regular polyhedrons. Since Kepler knew Euclid’s proof that there can be five and only five such mathematical objects made up of congruent faces, he decided that such self-sufficiency must betoken a perfect idea. If now the ratios of the mean orbital distances agreed with the ratios obtained from circumscribing and inscribing the polyhedrons, then, Kepler felt confidently, he would have discovered the architecture of the universe. Remarkably, Kepler did find agreement within 5 percent, with the exception of Jupiter, at which, he said, “no one will wonder, considering such a great distance.” He wrote to Maestlin at once: “I wanted to become a theologian; for a long time I was restless. Now, however, behold how through my effort God is being celebrated in astronomy.”
I am going to have to look into this ...
Amenhotep
Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 25, 2018 18:05:59 GMT -5
Okay ... an idea has occurred to me for the ratio of 12 (Mercury) and Earth (31) I keep experimenting with Kepelr's Third Law and found that Pi sqaure and then cube rooted gave me 2.14503. Now I am sure I had seen this number before so I started playing with numbers found at Giza and on my second try discovered that if we divide it into the number of cubits for The Pyramid of Khafre of G2 (410.92 to 411.14) we get 191.6221 and again right away I saw that this was extremely close to the number of inches between the apex of G2 and G1 of 19166.75 To match exactly we would need 2.14503 x 191.6675 and we get 411.13 or 8477.5 inches and within 0.6 inches of the south side measured by Petrie at 8776.9 close enough to call it a match so I was slowly starting to suspect that Giza also held Kepler's law in it. The calculator is a marvelous tool. What would have taken forever in Kepler's time can now be won in an instant and so it was that I returned to the vexing and nagging question I had on why 12 and 31 for Mercury and Earth in my diagram ... ... and then I finally saw it thanks to my calculator for what we have here is Pi cubed (Earth at 31.006) and the square root of 3 times 2 and then squared (Mercury at 12) ... I like closure. Amenhotep Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 25, 2018 18:12:41 GMT -5
Actually closer is sq rt of 2 / 10 (.141421356)+ 3 = 3.141421356 cubed = 31.00121 but still not as accurate as 31 / 12
db
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 25, 2018 20:22:01 GMT -5
Damn lost another long post ... oh well let's try again ... Okay having been reading Kepler I sort of have squared and cubed on the brain and so it was I decided to square Pi and then cube root it and got 2.14503. Now I had seem this somewhere so I decide to see if it matched anything using the other numbers we have at Giza and on on my second try I divided 411.04 by this number and got 191.6244 and as usual I recognized it and noted that it matched very closely the diagonal from G1 to G2. To match exactly we would need 2.14503 x 191.6675 and we would get 411.13 and equal to 8477.6 and very close to the south side of G2 at 8476.9 But I decided to press onward ... I kept thinking of the elliptical orbit of Mercury and how close it was to 360,000,000 and how we had determined that it was more than likely the reason that The Sumerians decided to use it as their base as 360 degree circle . But I was about to uncover another amazing secret from the past. To the best of my knowledge no one has ever thought of this before ... but the number 12, so very important all down through time .. and Mercury always the messenger in legends and then I decided to do something which is the type of thing that create legends ... I decided to multiply the speed of light by 12 , that is 299792.458 kilometers times 12 and was stunned when the answer came up on my calculator for there staring me in the face was yet another ancient secret of Mercury . Here is the present data we have on Mercury ... As you can see the exact orbital ecliptic distance of Mercury according to the most recent data is 359,975,975 kilometers and as we had noted very close to 360,000,000 ... but now back to 12 times the speed of light ... 1200 x 299792.458 gives us ... 359,750,949.6 within 0.9994 of matching exactly the present elliptical orbit. So there you have it ... the reason for 12 and the beauty of 12 for the orbit of Mercury is equal to 12 x 100 times the speed of light or light travels the elliptical in 1200 seconds ... or 20 minutes or 0.33333333 of an hour ... so nice and neat this Mercury is ... Amenhotep Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 25, 2018 20:37:58 GMT -5
Okay just one follow up and then to bed Speed of light is 299792.458 kilometers which equals 186282.39705122087 and if we multiply this by 12 we get 2235388.76 and if we divide by our 1,000,000 we get 2.2353888 which matches to the square root of 5 to within our usual accuracy of 0.9994 . 2.2353888 squared is 4.99696 and divided by 5 equals 0.9994 Bringing life to how I called the distance to Earth the square root of 5 Amenhotep Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 26, 2018 20:36:59 GMT -5
Hi all ... my brain has not rested for 3 days ... I am mentally exhausted. It was an ordeal to get through the day but it appears that for the moment the thoughts and ideas have ceased. We shall see. They usually come at night ... But this ... OGDOADPicture of the Egyptian Creator Gods and Goddesses OGDOAD from our Egyptian mythology image library. Illustration by Chas Saunders. Egyptian Creator Gods and Goddesses Eight primordial Egyptian Creator Gods The OGDOAD were the eight original beings before there were any beings. They come in husband-wife pairs: HUH and HAUHET, the rulers of infinity, KUK and KAUKET, the rulers of darkness, NUN and NAUNET, the rulers of primordial waters, and the secretive AMUN and AMAUNET, who rule hidden things. Four pairs ... Huh and Hauhet KUK and KAUKET NUN and NAUNET AMUN and AMAUNET And four pairs ... Okay let's recap where we are: 1) The knowledge for the pyramid's design came from Mesopotamia (Sumer) 2) It was probably Gilgamesh who brought them and he in fact was probably Imhotep ... "He who comes in peace" who's life story is sketchy at best. 3)The early original Gods were numbers and most notably the easy square roots, sq rt 2, sq rt 3 and sq rt 5 and Phi and 1 and 2 4) The most important ratio was Mercury to Earth which we found was 12 to 31. I suggested that is why 13 might have been said to be unlucky because you had turned Earth around . 5) These numbers were later incorporated in Egyptian legends as their Gods, Osiris, Isis, and others. 6) The Biblical story of Adam and Eve is probably referring, as Horus and Isis and Osiris story is, to the splitting of Phi from the square root of 5 as Eve was taken from Adam's rib. 5) The orbital elliptical distance for Mercury is 359,975,975 kilometers and I suggested that is why they chose 360 degrees and 60 x 60 for 3600 seconds WHICH CORRESPONDS TO THE LENGTH OF TIME FOR A SAR A UNIT OF MEASURE DENOTING 3600 YEARS. 1 year = 1 second ... 6) And in a major breakthrough I found that 1200 x the speed of light or 299792.458 = 359,750,949.6 and divided by a 1,000,000 would give us 359.7509496. So now by looking at a circle properly divided we could tell time because we knew the distance and the time it took.Turns out it takes light 20 minutes to travel the orbital elliptic of Mercury. So if we have a circumference of 1200 light years it translates to 20 minutes and the radius is simply 20 / 2 / Pi and is equal to 3.1831 now please remember this for we have seen it before. 7) And returning back to Giza for just a moment we find unbelievably that if we take our reduced distance of 359.7509496 and multiply by 10 to give us 3597.509496 and divide it by THE SQUARE ROOT OF 3 (1.732050807) we get 2077.0231 and multiply by 2 and we get ... 4154.0462 WHICH JUST HAPPENS TO BE THE PRECISE NUMBER OF INCHES IN G3 OR THE PYRAMID OF MENKARRE. Still not convinced ? Well I have done this exercise before and let's go back to Number 6) ... where we got 3.1831 and low and behold if we take 1 away from this we get 2.183098862 and if we multiply 2.183098862 by G3 or 4154.0462 inches we get ... drum roll please ... 9068.69 OR THE PRECISE BASE OF THE GREAT PYRAMID ... 8) Nice The fact that 12 is so crucial to all of this being Mercury and Mercury being equal to 12 as well as one half sq rt of 3 thus making 2 x Mercury = 24 and the square root of 3 It would make a pretty good reason to divide our "360" clock by 24 ... HOURS !!!!!! Cheers Amenhotep Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 27, 2018 6:10:29 GMT -5
Okay just a very quick post as I am off to work but I just wanted to emphasize what this number 3.1831 is. IT IS THE AVERAGE TIME THAT LIGHT TAKES TO REACH MERCURY IN MINUTES !!!!!!! It has been suggested in the past that the speed of light was encoded at Giza, we have now found the proof of that speculation. It ties in with earlier work I have done and I will tie it all together when I get home from work . So again a very, very simple equation for us 20/2 then divided by Pi will give us the time it takes light to reach Mercury from The Sun ... Now how simple is that to grasp ? Amenhotep Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 27, 2018 19:45:23 GMT -5
Had lots to add ... was thinking all day ... but then I went and got drunk after work ,,, we will try again tomorrow Amenhotep Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 28, 2018 6:54:42 GMT -5
So now we have an accurate measure for the second ... given to us by The Creator ... It is 1/1200th of the time taken for light to travel the elliptical orbit of Mercury ... 20 minutes divided by 1200 is ... One second
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 28, 2018 21:34:27 GMT -5
Hi all ... well the intense vibes have almost stopped yet again and I am going to wing it on things I remember from the last two days as I was driving around and wrote down. But first this quote: Sexagesimal divisions of calendar time and day:
Civilizations in the classic period and before constructed divisions of the calendar as well as arcs according to a sexagesimal system of counting, but none used the term second, and none was a precursor to the modern second. Sundials were among the earliest timekeeping devices, and units of time were measured in degrees of arc. Conceptual units of time smaller than realizable on sundials were also used. There are references to 'second' as part of a lunar month in the writings of natural philosophers of the Middle Ages, but no evidence that 'seconds' were ever realizable or adopted as part of timekeeping based on the lunar calendar Okay the point of that posting was for all of us to think as we read through these next several posts and realize a light second would have been completely unknown or unknowing to the average ancient person. Here logic must dictate if you are trying to tell this story at the time and even for future generations you want to make it stand out. You want to make it nice and neat so the logical thing would be to round from 359759349.6 to 360,000,000 and divide by a million to get it to our 360 degree circle which we inherited from these same "Builders" and to used 1200 seconds or times speed of light exactly as opposed to 359,975,975 / Speed of light to get 1200.75 ... So on to what the ancients were trying to tell us ... The first thing is that every time we looked at a circle we would see the orbit of Mercury. This would show us time and distance. Time is 1200 seconds or 20 minutes and distance is the orbit of Mercury in light years but also in a ratio of 1200 to the orbit and that would be rounded 300,000. From here each angle would easily give us both the time and the distance. Here is example. It shows the overall orbit and 18 degrees: Special note that the angle gives us the unit of measure around the perimeter. For an example 18 is 360,000,000 / 20 = 18000000 or divide by our million again to get 18 ... so degree is the distance ... Here is a second example ... And a third one ... But what does this really show us ? It shows us the time taken for light to reach Mercury from The Sun so this is the image that follows ... And for all those who want further proof of the validity of the claim that Giza is THE WORLD'S OLDEST BOOK OF ASTRONOMY and that all I have tired to tell you over the past 19 years is valid and true I ask that you read these two pages where it was all shown to us in clear and concise measurements ... Please read these pages of mine for further clarification: The Power of 99The Power of Times 10 Divided by Pi An Expanded Look at The Power of Times Ten Divided by PiThe Orbital Periods of The Planets as found at GizaWe are going to look at these thoughts again with a clearer understanding of what these numbers mean ... Clive ... was right. Amenhotep Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 29, 2018 8:27:37 GMT -5
Okay still a couple of things to look at in our creation epic ... shall we call them The Barone Sagas ... or is that too egotistical ? Regardless on we go ... While staring at the diagram just now I saw this ... For those of you who have been following and are beginning to see through the numbers we had determined that the difference between the semi major axis of Mars and Earth was such that this distance divided into The Earth's distance gave us a ratio of 1.909 ... and now The Creator's plan and design ... Same plan but instead of using 3.1831 light minutes we have switched to the number of light and years and have substituted Earth where Mercury was ... observe ... Next we are going to find a hundred light years and we find out lo and behold that the arc distance for a 30 degree angle gives us 100 light years ... nice, observe: Next we are going to mark 100 light years on the radius of our circle of "The Creation" like so: Next we are going to use the left over of 90.986 light years as a radius and draw the following diagram ... And since by definition the distance between the 100 light year mark and Earth is equal to the distance between Earth ans Mars we arrive and this sweet image ... In this image the radius time is obviously not 3.1831 light minutes anymore but is 31/12 or Earth / Mercury or 2.583333 x 3.1831 and we get 8.223 light seconds ... now where have we seen that number before ? (HINT: LOOK AT THE PYRAMID OF KHAFRE) And we see the solar system unfolding before our very eyes, not in a pyramid this time but in the only other object I have always claimed could show The Creation ... THE CIRCLE ! Amenhotep Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 29, 2018 9:17:29 GMT -5
Okay to clarify the above it must be noted that we will no longer be using 3.1831 light minutes as our radius to Earth because that has now changed, We have increased the scale by 31/12 or 2.583333 so the radius is now 3.1831 x 2.5833 and we get 822.30 Gee have we seen that number before ? (HINT: Look at The Pyramid of Khafre ! ) So we arrive at a new diagram and new Revelations ... and then for a finale (for now) we have this image ... In my opinion this is how it was explained to the ancient people by "The Master Designers" Who were they or who was he ... I still say the best bet is Gilgamesh, half god and half man in the myths ... King of Uruk and who scholars have this to say about him ... Gilgamesh is a demigod of superhuman strength who builds the city walls of Uruk to defend his people and, after the death of his friend Enkidu, then travels to meet the sage Utnapishtim, who had survived the Great Flood.We were always taught or it was written that everything began in Sumer ... I am starting to think this is absolutely correct. We will tackle the sexigessiaml system and how it might relate soon. Using these numbers we find the ratio of The Mile to The Kilometer is 93,000,000 x 2 x Pi = 584,336,233.5677 and divided into 930,000,000 km gives us a (new) value of 1.59155 or and unbelievably we find that getting the reciprocal of this value gives us 0.6283185307179586476925286766559 and divide by two gives us 0.31415926535897932384626433832795 AND IS EXACTLY PI DIVIDED BY 10 ! Now isn't that nice and neat ... so the new kilometer suggested by me is Pi / 5 = 0.628318530718 and is now the new mile to kilometer ratio. And before you dismiss these new thoughts out of hand I would turn your attention to our solar system where the ratio of orbital velocities of Earth (29.78273) and Mercury (47.3616) gives us a ratio of 1.590238 and further that doing the same thing with Pluto we get ... Earth (29.78273 km/sec) to Pluto at 4.739879 and giving us a ratio of 0.1591485 both extremely close ... Amenhotep Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 29, 2018 12:19:35 GMT -5
Looking for Venus again ... How comes we are always looking for Venus ? Onward ... In this image ... but let's plot Mercury ... Easiest way to do that us to use our 31 to 12 ratio and simply divide 190.986 by 31 then multiply by 12 to get ... 73.93 in light years and translates to 1.2321677 in light minutes which equal x 18 ( 18 is 1 light minute) we get 18 x 1.2321677 = 22.1790 as a degree of the circle. 22.1790 divided by 12 is 1.848251613 and if multiplied by our distance to Mercury = 107030495 and divide by a million to get 1.070305. Square root of 3 divided by Phi is 1.07046627 1.070305 / 1.07046627 = 99985 So let's plot the line ... and finally this one ... ... Amenhotep Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 29, 2018 12:36:06 GMT -5
Okay a brief return to Giza to show what we have found along the way.
Base of G3 in inches = 4154
Also 1200 x sq rt of 3 = 2078.46 x 2 = 4156.9 ... South side of G3 measured at 4157.8 inches
Base of The Great Pyramid in inches is 9068.6
9068.6 / 4154 = 2.1831
Therefore total is 3.1831 as G3 = 1 unit and difference between 9068.6 and 4154 or 4914.9 = 2.1831
3.1831 as we have found is the time it takes light to get to Mercury from The Sun when we base it's orbital distance as 1200 x the speed of light and or 1200 seconds of 20 minutes.
Then we have the base of The Pyramid of Khafre ... average base is 411 x 4 or 1644.02 giving us the time in minutes it takes light to get from The Sun and back. 8.223 x 2 (perfect number is 8477.9 or 411.15 cubits and a whisker away from the south side of The Pyramid of Khafre (G2) measured at 8476.9
The Circle and The Square and the union of both and both showing us the same thing, Our Solar System and The Creation but in different ways ... very nice don't you think ?
Ahatmose Amenhotep
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 29, 2018 17:56:12 GMT -5
You might be wondering why I have started to sign my name Ahatmose Amenhotep ... It is becasue away back in 1999 it was one of the first message boards I joined and it taught me virtually all I know about designing website as you could design your own house and courtyard etc. Here is basically what the entrance page looked like ... Ancient Worlds... and what a house looked lie. I can't find mine but I have it saved somewhere in among the 22 Terabytes of data I have saved ... An Egypt Homeand a home page ... An Egyptian Citizen's HomeIt taught me everything so that I could move on to the 300 plus websites I now have ... Emhotep Ahatmose Amenhotep
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 29, 2018 19:34:32 GMT -5
And just something to think about until we get there. God there is so much to cover ... The average speed of earth as it travels it's elliptical orbit, sometimes slower and other times faster, but average speed is 29.78273 kilometers per sec. Mercury average speed, finally corrected on all NASA websites after I pointed out that the speed they were using was for a circular orbit of Mercury not the elliptical one, is 47.3616271 kilometers per second. This is a ratio to Earth's of simply dividing 47.3616271 by 29.78273 and we get a ratio of 1.590238 ... Pluto on the other end of The Solar System is a slow poke and average speed is only 4.739879 and amazingly (well I think so) is virtually precisely 1/10th of the speed of Mercury relative to The Earth's speed ... We have: 47.361271 for Mercury and 4.739879 for Pluto gives us -------------------------- 9.992 ...==================== This would lead us to conjecture that the orbital distance of Pluto should be 10 times 360,000,000 km and come in at 3,600,000,000 or 10 times Mercury but it comes in at 36,348,870,300 over 100 times Mercury or some 120,000 seconds that it would take light to travel the distance. Interesting however the circular orbit of Mercury using the semi major axis of 57,909,050 km gives us 363,853,292 and divided by Pluto at 36,348,870,300 gives us a ratio of 99.90 while using Mercury's elliptical orbit distance of 359,975,975 divided by 36,348,870,300 gives us 100.98 or 0.009902 ... For the curious (I am one of them) there are 36,348,870,300 / 299792.458 = 121,246.78 light seconds in the orbit or light would take 121,246.78 / 60 = 2020.78 minutes or 84.20 hours or 3.5083 days ... just thought you m might be curious ... accordingly using the simple formula of x/2/Pi we get 121,246.78 / 2 / Pi and we get 19297.02 seconds for light to reach Pluto which is 321.62 and 5.3603 hours ... and checking I get ... Pluto's distance from the Sun is from 4.4 to 7.4 billion kilometers. The speed of light is 300,000 km/sec. Light takes between from 4.1 hours and 6.8 hours to travel from the Sun to Pluto. For the mean distance of 5.9 billion km, it would take 5.46 hours. Boy light seconds come in handy when you are measuring long distances. Here is an image I did to aid myself that might come in handy as we progress ... orbital and speed ratios of the planetsAha Amenhotep
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 30, 2018 8:20:08 GMT -5
Hi all just to show how powerful this circle can be I would like to post this, an old image from one of my sights. I was just reviewing things and noted the major significance of the image. Observe: In this image the outer circle is the total equatorial diameters of all of the 8 agreed upon planets. Go here to see the link of mine.The radius of this circle now becomes 10 times THE RADIUS OF THE EARTH. and breaking it down for Giza we have G3 equal to 4007.65 and G1 equal to 8749.1 Here is another exercise I did ... Start with our ratio of G1 to G3: Now we are going to assign a value of 10 times THE CIRCULAR ORBITAL DISTANCE of Mercury which is 10 x 363,853,292 = 3,638,532,920 km to "G3" Then we will show what 1 Mercury orbit would equal: And a final image from that earlier page of mine. I can't emphasize enough that the ratio of G1 to G3 is totally to do with the circle and is a portal to what the Ancient Designers were thinking. It is a major key in the understanding of Giza. It fits on so many levels ... G3 as between 4154 and 4157.6 answers so many questions and shows so many things. Emhotep Aha Amenhotep
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 30, 2018 8:36:04 GMT -5
Okay just a casual observation ... that I never noted before ... Firstly we must make note of this interesting fact (not mine) that 10,000,000 times Pi then squared equals 31415926.536 and squared = 5604.99 . If we use this as a base for a square the diagonal becomes 7926.655 and is almost precisely the diameter of our Earth in miles which is 7926.385. But that is not what my post is on. I had never noted before that 12,756.28 which is the equatorial diameter of Our Earth was so close to the tan of the Pi angle. The Pi angle yields a tan of 4 / Pi or 1.27324 and times 10,000 gives us 12732.4 not very close 99.81. 1.275628 yields an angle of 51.91 ... hmmmmm. I wonder what the great circle equals that runs through Giza ? Would it be 12732.4 kilometers ? I will try to find out ... nope not even close ... about 12547.97 km
Emhotep Aha Amenhotep
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 30, 2018 12:29:09 GMT -5
You know I have been sorely mistaken for a very long time ... The Creator did not use the kilometer or even the inch to measure The Creation. I have finally seen The Light, no pun intended but the only possible measure The Creator could have used was ... the speed of light ! And interestingly there is a number that nicely allows transfers between Earthly measures and those of The Creator and you are going to love this one ... it is none other ... than ... THE ROYAL CUBIT of 20.62 ... and I suggest that it why it is considered royal ... it is the transition measure between the light second and light minute and the cubit. So very interesting. ...
I will be trying to explain this is the next series of posts ...
So the problem I come up against is of course what is "The Second" and what really is a kilometer for the speed of light is designated as a time value and not a distance so for example the speed of light is the distance light travels in 1 / 299792.458ths of a second. We have taken that number times a million (1,000,000) and called it a the number of kilometers light will travel in a second. But what is a second ... how long is it ? It originally was 1/86,400ths of the time it took for Earth to make one complete revolution on it's axis, in other words 1/86,400ths of a day. However the length of day has changed so now what ? I propose that we return to the messenger of The Gods ... Mercury to help us out ... so I propose the second is 1/1200th of the time it takes light to travel around the elliptical orbit of Mercury or 359,975,975 / 1200 or 299979.979166667 or 1/299979.979166667 of a Creator's Second.
Actually why don't we simply make it 1/300,000ths of A Creator's Second ?
Food for thought that would make The Dormouse proud.
Emhotep Aha Amenhotep
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 30, 2018 14:30:18 GMT -5
Okay it is time. ... Time to return to where it all started ... Giza. We are going to start with The Great Pyramid for hidden in plain site in this amazing building is a vast amount of astronomical knowledge ... so let us start. Here is how I envisioned the square of The Great Pyramid. The number I arrived at was 9068.9968 I am going to call them Creator's Inches for they are virtually identical with our modern inch. Thus I claim that the switch to The Metric System was okay but the ratio between The Mile and The Kilometer ... or let me rephrase that the ratio between The Creator's Mile and The Creator's Kilometer DOES NOT COINCIDE WITH WHAT WE ARE PRESENTLY USING IN THE METRIC SYSTEM. It is wrong and I claim it is out of sync with what it should be ... more ravings of a madman ? Well think about it. Almost all calculations are done within their own so even if the kilometer was not correct it would make little difference to any calculations that used either metre or centimeter because they are always just ratios of each other. The inch is working for DUNE over at Graham's because it is, for lack of a better word, sacred. It is part of the fabric of the creation. Here is the image that tells the story. Multiplying by 10 the result of dividing by sq rt of 3 gives us 9068.9968 and these are not Earthly inches but they are a number formed from the creation of a circle using just sq rt of 2, sq rt of 3 and Pi. The fact that it coincides almost exactly with our modern day inch would lead me to believe it is a sacred measure and possibly even exactly what The Creator had intended. So it appears that our present inch is virtually identical to what was intended and that the kilometer we are using could be out as much as 1.0006922856 (rounded off) ... think on it as we visit once again ... THE GREAT PYRAMID AT GIZAWith our new found knowledge we know that Mercury and Earth are in the ratio of 12 to 31 or 0.3870967742 this is simply 31 / 12 or 2.583333 reciprocal. So let us take at the measurement of The Ancient Egyptians, they had it at 440 cubits. Now 440.0 squared and times 2 gives us 387200 and divide by our million and we get 0.387200 . Now this gives us a ratio of 12 to 30.991735 ... can we do better ? sure we can. Let's reverse engineer it and start with 0.3870967742 and times a million and we get 387096.7742. So now reverse engineering gives us 387096.7742 / 2 then square root and we arrive at ... 439.94 and x 20.62 gives us 9071.59 sacred inches. It is definitely there. But we have but scratched the surface of what is there. For now let us look at the angle of The Great Pyramid ... In my diagram above I claim that the angle produced is the Pi arrived at by dividing 4 by Pi (3.14159265) and getting the tan of the angle. This turns out to be ... 51.853974 (rounded) and this gives us some nice insights into what might have been going on ... If we take the angle and divide by 10 we get 5.18539740 and if allow these to represent LIGHT MINUTES we get when we times 60 to get seconds 311.124 and doubling this gives us 622.247688 and if we call this the diagonal it leads us to a side of (divide by sq rt of 2) 439.995 so we have the angle defining the side of the sqaure using the light minute and light second. Now how about that ? Add that to the fact that the year of Mercury is 87.96971 days and times 5 years gives us 439.84855 x 20.62 or 9069.677 so there for 20 years would give us 87.96971 x 20 or 1759.3942. If we wanted to be neat we would simply just round off and call it 88 days and 1760 ... but that number again ... 20 ... Allow me to show you ... Forgot to add diagonal divided by 12 gives us the Pi angle ! 622.2477 / 12 = 51.854 Now tell me again that Giza is not The World's Oldest Book of Astronomy !
Emhotep Aha Amenhotep
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 30, 2018 15:49:52 GMT -5
Almost forgot to add this ... I have notes everywhere ...
It goes along with what I said about the cubit being a sacred transition for Sacred to Worldly.
Example:
Cubit is 20.62 Creator Inches
divide by 10 and we get 2.062
Cube root of 2.062 is 1.272808 this is the tan for 51.84454 (Pi angle to 0.9996) x 12 = 622.13448 sides of 439.9155 x 20.62 = 9071.06
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 30, 2018 17:19:29 GMT -5
Here is another example of a hidden message in plain site. Now the reason I have done three calculations is because the distance to Neptune is all over the place. But I trust in Giza. Thus I can not agree with the official distance which is now 4,498,396,441. It doesn't fit Giza so I do not believe it is correct. My best guess would be either 4,502,455,070 (base 439.823) or 4,503,443,361 (base 439.92) ... best fit from ratio is 12 / 31 and 439.94 More information in a simple square ... amazing Emhotep
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Apr 30, 2018 21:08:02 GMT -5
In our previous image we have divided the diagonal in 8 parts ... but now we will compliment that golden ratio wise and divide by 13 and we get ... well let's reverse engineer this one. Mercury's speed around The Sun on it's mythical circular orbital path equals 363,853,292 so now let's divide by rounded days in a year or 88 to get 4134696.5 next we will divide by 24 to get hours = 172279.020833 divide by 60 to get minutes = 2871.31701388889 and finally by 60 to get speed per second and we get 47.8553 now I said 13 parts so 13 x 47.8553 = 622.12 and gives us sides of 439.904 x 20.62 or 9070.8 ... so the diagonal has given us the distance to Neptune (8) and the orbital speed of Mercury also (13) ... using 8 and 13. Nice ... And just an update adding one more god to the mix ... ratio of Earth to Ceres: I am just sort of playing with this idea but I have a feeling that the 2 years (2 x 88 = 176 days ) = 3 days (58.667 days) of Mercury was indeed known in the past and we will just have to uncover it ... thinking of seked we would have 5 years = 7.5 days or 1.5 So we will have to have a look at any 1.5 ratio we might run into ... AHA
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 1, 2018 7:00:35 GMT -5
Okay much research has suggested a close relationship with some of our findings and the inch. Some have dismissed them simply because they say that "The Builders" did not know the inch, Especially to that accuracy and they are correct for I have to repeat here that what appear to be inches is simply a mathematical result of this diagram. Where the apparent number of inches for The Great Pyramid appear in this geometrical figure that uses just sq rt of 2, sq rt of 3 and Phi. Again I have to emphasize that they are not the inches we know or use now, they are a proponent of this geometric figure and it is my contention that all the inches encountered on The Giza Plateau and within The Giza Rectangle are of this variety, the cosmic inch if you will. So the argument that they did not know inches is no longer valid. But now just a very quick visit back to The Bent Pyramid. We still are wondering what is the true distance between The Bent Pyramid and The Rec Pyramid. It could be as simple as G3 x Phi x 12 or from earlier work ... " ... 7) And returning back to Giza for just a moment we find unbelievably that if we take our reduced distance of 359.7509496 and multiply by 10 to give us 3597.509496 and divide it by THE SQUARE ROOT OF 3 (1.732050807) we get 2077.0231 and multiply by 2 and we get ... 4154.0462 WHICH JUST HAPPENS TO BE THE PRECISE NUMBER OF INCHES IN G3 OR THE PYRAMID OF MENKARRE. " so now we have 4154.0462 x Phi and we get 6721.388 and if we call these "feet" and call this number the number of feet between The Bent and The Rec Pyramids then times 12 will give us ... 80656.655 "inches" and divide by the height of The Bent which we called 4082.552 inches and we get 19.75643198 and if multiply this by 227,939,100 since we state the the larger portion of The Bent and The Red Pyramid are showing us Mars we get 4 503,263,325 and one of the values for the semi major axis of Neptune is 4,503,443,661 and checking to within ... 0.99996 db
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 1, 2018 7:39:28 GMT -5
And just a wee bit of a side trip here ... I was on Wiki last night and was reading of our Universe ...
Size of our universe is said to be 91,000,000,000 (billion) light years in size this translates to 2,871,741,600,000,000,000 light seconds. The age of The Universe is said to be 13.8 billion years which translates to 435,494,880,000,000,000 seconds the ratio of these equal:
2,871,741,600,000,000,000 / 435,494,880,000,000,000 = 6.59420289855072464 AS A RATIO
It is my contention that when the dust has settled the ratio between age of The Universe and size of The Universe will end up being the ratio ... 6 ... Why because that is how long creation took ...
So if the ratio is to be 6 and I contend that the age of The Universe will end up being (it changes all the time) 14.13716694115407 years then the size of the Universe is 6 x 14.13716694115407 is 84.823001647 light years in size ... 14.137 derived from 45 x Pi X 6 . If we use Pi x 2 for age of universe we get 88.8264396098 for size of Universe. Will it be this simple ? why not ? I believe it is written that a day for the Lord is like an eternity for us. Thus 6 days for The Creator is like 14.137 BILLION YEARS for us. Just something to think on ...
db
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 1, 2018 15:20:54 GMT -5
Okay let's let The Universe be for a while and return to Giza, this time with a look at G2.
Most would agree that this pyramid was built on the premise of a 3, 4 and 5 sided right angled triangle and thus the calculations are quite easy one simply takes the base then divide by 6 and multiply by 5 to get the slope and by 4 to get the height quite simple really. Okay there are 4 bases listed by Petrie so there are four answers to figure out ...
N. side = 8471.9 E. side = 8475.2 S. side = 8476.9 W. side = 8475.5 ----------------------- Mean = 8474.9
So now let's very quickly figure out the height and the slope ...
N. side = 8471.9 / 6 = 1411.98333 x 4 = height = 5647.933 and times 5 to give us slope = 7059.91666 E. side = 8475.2 / 6 = 1412.53333 x 4 = height = 5650.133 and times 5 to give us slope = 7062.66667 S. side = 8476.9 / 6 = 1412.81666 x 4 = height = 5651.266 and times 5 to give us slope = 7064.08333 W. side = 8475.5 / 6 = 1412.58333 x 4 = height = 5650.333 and times 5 to give us slope = 7062.91667
So we have a 5 inch swing in base, 3.3 in height and 4.1 in slope.
Now so what ? Well I was looking at a post of DUNE just recently posted at Graham's and was thinking that in cubits the height ranges from 273.91 cubits to 274.067 cubits. Now I started off by figuring what the base would be for exactly 274.00 cubits and times 20.62 we get 5649.88 extremely close to the north side ... story #1. The I decided to take what 9 months of the year is and got 365.25 / 12 x 9 and got 273.9375 and times 20.62 gives us 5648.59125 or 6/10ths of an inch off of the north side value - story #2, Equatorial surface gravity of The Sun 274.0 m/s or 1/4 inch off of East side - story # 3 but I can't help but feel that the numbers involved in the sides themselves 3 + 4 + 5 = 12 will eventually lead us somewhere ...
Emhotep Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 1, 2018 22:49:45 GMT -5
Okay here is an interesting little something I discovered just now. It is based on my discovery that the diagonal of a square divided by 8 times semi major axis of Mercury will give us the planet's semi major axis.
Let's start with Neptune ... diagonal of 440 is 622.25 divide by 8 is 77.781746 x 57,909,050 = 4,504,267,014
Uranus ... diagonal of 280 is 395.9797975 divide by 8 is 49.49747468 x 57,909,050 = 2,866,351,736
Saturn ... diagonal of 140 is 197.989899 divide by 8 is 24.748737342 s 57,909,050 = 1,433,175,868
Jupiter ... diagonal of 76 is 107.4802307 divide by 8 = 13.4350288425 x 57,909,050 = 778,009,757
Now isn't that easy to remember ... All Giza numbers:
440 base of G1 280 height of G1 140 1/2 height of G1 76 distance to intersection of "King's air shafts"
Now surely we can all remember that ...
It doesn't seem to work for the inner planets so another method must be involved ...
Cheers Don barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 2, 2018 7:33:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 2, 2018 8:19:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on May 2, 2018 8:36:32 GMT -5
A final picture ?
|
|