
Post by Don Barone on Apr 16, 2018 12:04:30 GMT 5
Okay here is I think the correct value ... Pyramid volume 2'592'968.43m³ including the rock core. This would be a cube with a length of 137.38m. Probable volume of stones used: 2'583'283m³ [1] or 2'326'501m³ [2]. [1] M. Lehner The Complete Pyramids of Egypt [2] G. Goyon Die CheopsPyramide So Mark Lehner feels that the volume of stones used equals 2'583'283m³ ... well since he apparently and according to all Egyptologists is never wrong .. forward Cheers Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 16, 2018 13:15:11 GMT 5
The dishonesty that abounds in Egyptology ... Wiki is a main source for many people and it is troubling when the information posted is bogus. I am not even going to say in error it has been manipulated to fit the mainstream propaganda story ... and fulfill the myth of the 175 by 275 cubit pyramid. Here is what I mean ... Now Petrie himself states that his best guess for the height of The Pyramid at Meidum was 3619 inches. This translates to 3619 / 39.37 = 91.9226 NOT 91.65 ... IT IS TOTALLY WRONG ... It is simply meant to sell the idea of 175 cubits of 20.62 inches when this is totally not what is there and they darn well know it. Okay now to the base they give us 144 meters ... or 275 cubits 144 meters is 5669.3 inches when Petrie has clearly stated what he measured for this pyramid ... and they have 472 feet which is 5664 inches while 144 meters is 5669.3 inches ... they can't even get that right ... 5682 is 473.5 feet ... 275 cubits at 20.62 gives us 5670.5 and 4.5 to 7 inches off ... AND FROM THE AVERAGE OF 5682 IS OFF MORE THAN A FOOT ... The angle they claim in decimal is 51.8430555 with a tan of 1.2727402 or 0.78570632 (very close to 7 / 5.5 ) ... so if the base is 144 meters then half base times 1.2727402 shoudl give us height ... it gives us 91.64 but the height according to Petrie should be 91.9226 meters which would make the base 91.9226 x .7870632 then times 2 = 144.45 and equal to 5686.9 So obviously now we know another lesson ... never trust Wiki ... or at least their sources. db



Post by Don Barone on Apr 16, 2018 17:09:24 GMT 5
Okay food for thought ... Age
The universe is currently estimated at roughly 13.8 billion years old, give or take 130 million years. In comparison, the solar system is only about 4.6 billion years old.
This estimate came from measuring the composition of matter and energy density in the universe. This allowed researchers to compute how fast the universe expanded in the past. With that knowledge, they could turn the clock back and extrapolate when the Big Bang happened. The time between then and now is the age of the universe.4.39823 x Pi = 13.8175 ... Just thought I would mention it ... ... and our Earth apparently was formed precisely 2/3rd of the way ... 4.6 / 13.8 = 0.33333 from now or 0.66666 from the start. Cheers Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 16, 2018 17:52:30 GMT 5
We have looked at this before but we may need it soon ...
speed of light is 299,792,458 meters per second. This translates to 29,979,245,800 centimeters per second. This translates when divided by 2.54 into 11,802,852,677.165354330708661417323 inches ... so what I can hear from a lot of you ... well how about if we try to fit Phi into the mix. so let's try this
Phi  1.5 = 0.11803398874989484820458683436564 x 1,000,000 divided into speed of light in inches equals 99995.4 or within 0.999954 % cheers db



Post by Don Barone on Apr 17, 2018 7:24:21 GMT 5
Good morning ... This morning we are going to take another look at the size of the base of The Great Pyramid of the stylized 440 cubit square and the base of The Great Pyramid and more specifically it's diagonal of 622.25 cubits. We will try to determine if what I am going to post is just a coincidence or was this distance selected to show what follows. Firstly in earlier work I had shown that the diagonal of 622.25 or more specifically 622.18 (base of 439.94) when divided by 13 gave us 47.86 and the speed of Mercury in kilometers per second in a circular orbit of Mercury. I had also shown earlier that a diagonal of 622.14 (base 439.92) gave us the ratio of Mercury to Neptune (77.7675279148 or 57,909,050 x 77.7675279148 = 4,503,443,662.4) but now for a couple of new and very interesting observations about this base of 440 and diagonal of 622.25. Now the arguments have been raging for many, many years that Pi is or is not encoded within The Great Pyramid. Well today we are going to put that argument to bed once and for all and we are going to prove and show that Pi is part of the very nature of the dimensions of this Great Pyramid. Firstly we are going to find the Pi angle and that is simply 4 / Pi to get the tangent of The Pi Angle and we find that it is 1.2732395447351626861510701069801 and using this as a tan we get 51.853974012777452454524489216986 forgive the string of decimals but I always find it imperative that I do this so no one can say it works because I rounded off. Okay so how am I going to prove that Pi is part of the very fabric of the agreed upon distance of 440 cubits ? It is so very neat and simple and I am surprised I missed it in earlier work. And so it was last night as I was dividing 622.25 by various numbers to see if anything fit when I chanced to divided 622.25 by 12 and got 51.85416666. I said to myself gee that looks close to the Pi angle and so I divided it by the actual Pi angle and found that it checked to within 0.999996 or less than 4 / one millionths ... wow was all I could say . To check exactly we would simply need actual (51.853974012777452454524489216986 x 12 = 622.247688 and yields sides or base of 439.99556. Now really how amazing is that and even if you want to call it a coincidence it is still a very neat little trick to prove Pi and Giza ... As a little added check we can simply divide sides by 12 to get 440 / 12 = 36.6666666 and calculate the diagonal we get sq rt of 36.666666 squared times 2 and we find it is sq rt of 2688.8888888 or 51.854497287013485122728586554356 and checking for 0.9999899 ... Your Honor the Numbers rest .... Now another look at an old number I had come up with. I had determined that the total ratios of all 8 planets totaled 276.4641219104 + or  I wanted to see if this showed us anything and so after several attempts I happened to be trying a way of finding the AU's of a given planet by simply first inverting or finding the reciprocal of 276.4641219104 to get 0.003617106 (ignore for now how close it is to 3.618034) then times 31 to get 0.1121303 then divide by 12 to get 0.0093442 and then inverse again and we get 107.018369772 and checking to the sq rt of 3 divided by Phi (1.070466269) to 0.9997 ... possibly. Cheers but try to remember that trick for proving Pi and try it next time you are in an argument where they say Pi is not to be found at Giza and within The Great Pyramid ... Cheers Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 17, 2018 7:55:50 GMT 5
Okay I am going to post this diagram I did for you to use as a source for other work we have done and to point out an amazing thing I just discovered ... First the image ... I was sort of concentrating on G2 and the 8475 number when I chanced to look at the meters involved and I was startled to see some old favorites of ours. For there in the meter column was none other than 215.277 and the exact number I had predicted would be the distance from The Great Pyramid to Meidum of 215777 FEET but more importantly gives us in inches 2,583,333 inches and the ratio of Mercury to Earth using their semi major axis'. I have to admit to being a bit stunned by this. So what we have here is the west side of The Pyramid of Khafre or better known simply as G2 is showing us possibly the distance from The Great Pyramid to Meidum in a ratio of 1 meter (at G2) = 1000 feet in actuality on the ground. So 215.2777 meters (x 1000) = 215277.777 feet. This would now also explain why 8475 and 8475.5 seem to solve so many of the other calculations we have done ... Well now isn't that about as interesting as it gets ... Cheers Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 17, 2018 10:20:46 GMT 5
Okay fasten your seat belts as we are journeying down the rabbit hole yet again. This time we are vising Dashur and are going to look at the enclosure wall around the Bent Pyramid. I am not sure why I did not do this earlier. Here is John Legon's diagram You will notice that John Legon has the overall distance of the wall (not including the part that surrounds the small pyramid} as 560 cubits . Here is what Petrie measured ... Now 560 cubits is equal to 560 x 20.62 or 11547.2 YET PETRIE MEASURED THE OUTER WALL AS 11757.7 OR 570.11 CUBITS IN ERROR TO JUST OVER 10 CUBITS and this would make the wall about 5 cubits thick. Petrie says if we use the inner wall we get 11757 or 570 cubits so it would appear that either Petrie made an error or John Legon has made a serious error. So should the measurement to the inner wall be 11547 ? Could Petrie have made an error this grave ? Or is his 11757 and 570 cubits correct ? But anyway we deal only in inches so let's proceed. Now maybe it is becasue I drink too much or because I take a calculator to bed with me at night or maybe, just maybe it is because these things are actually there that I find them ... but let's look at this enclosure like we looked at the enclosure at Meidum ... Here is the enclosure as Petrie drew it ... and filling in the measurements ... So doing the math it does indeed look like the measurements in blue are indeed for the outer wall with the thickness of the wall in Petrie's own words being ... For now I need a break ... nothing is popping out yet ... but I have faith that it is there. Average of the six widths average 99.6 but I am leaning to 5 cubits or 103.6 inches ... If we use 103.6 x 2 we get 11772.9  206.2 or 11566.7 inches ... break time. Cheers Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 17, 2018 10:45:41 GMT 5
Okay just a very quick addendum to the post above ... John Legon claims 362 cubits while I claim 361.8034 cubits or Phi squared + 1 But first I want you to take a look at Petrie once again missing the obvious. He may have measured accurately but his sense of numbers really was lacking. For some reason he refused to accept 20.62 inches in a cubit as it would really have made his life so much easier. Okay so now to the argument between John and I. He claims 362 which would equal 362 x 20.62 or 7464.44 which matches the north side to within an inch ... not bad ... I claim 361.8034 x 20.62 = 7460.39 and checks to the west side of the pyramid to within 0.15 of an inch ... even better. So it would appear that we could both be correct and as always there may be more than one correct solution. Cheers Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 17, 2018 20:27:24 GMT 5
Wow that was tough. I have spent all day trying to make some sense out of the measurements at The Bent and it's enclosure wall and I think I may have finally come up with something. All day I kept searching for a relationship between the perimeters of both the wall and the pyramid to see if any ratio popped out at me ... they didn't. I was at my wits end and then finally had a thought ... why don't I use the height I said to myself ... and so I did. Here is the diagram again with the measurements ... I even did the little pyramid looking for some sort of answer. Here is that diagram ... I tried every combination I could think of but failed to get anything meaningful. And then I tried the height ! The perimeter of the outside wall is 47039.7 and it is probably meant to be 47040 inches and divide by 4 gives us 11760 on average on a side. The height I used in the one I have been using all along and that is 197.989899 inches which is 4082.552 inches. The first thing I did was divide this into the average side and got 11760 / 4082.552 and got 2.88055138. Now as usual this probably doesn't mean a lot to a lot of you but some might recognize it as the ratio between the period (orbit time in Earth days) plus one of Mars (686.971) and Earth (365.25) . And so I checked it and divided 365.25 into 686.971 and got 1.8808241 and plus 1 to get 2.8808240931 and as a check times 4082.552 and it gives us 11761.1. So out only 1.1 inches around the entire wall. Pretty good I would say. But what does that show or tell us ? Well it shows us that 4082.552 is Earth at 365.25 and 11761 is 2 x Earth plus 1 Mars or 2 x 365.25 + 686.971 and it gives us ... hold on to your hat ... wait for it ... 1417.48 and basically the horizontal of our Giza Rectangle where Clive long, long ago had shown us that 2 Earths plus one Mars gives us 1417.50 and he showed us that possibly that was what the small pyramids were showing us .. here is Clive's image from so very long ago. So now we have a starting point to try to find more information. So like everything else The Ancient Builders did it always leads back in some way to ... THE SOLAR SYSTEM AND EARTH AND VENUS AND MERCURY AND MARS ... and my only regret is that not everyone can or wants to see it. Cheers Don barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 17, 2018 21:29:56 GMT 5
Sorry folks it was the right idea but I kinda got it wrong. I forgot that one of The Earths was the height so the 11760 was just representing 1 Earth + 1 Mars with the height also representing 1 Earth of 4082.552 inches. So now we have 11760  4082.552 (Earth) and we get 7677.448 which represents Mars and shoudl be 1.8808241 x 4082.522 and we get 7678.562 and checks for an inch so this is now the new diagram ... The Earth in the center was put there to represent the height of The Bent Pyramid. So let's review what we have found ... When height of The Bent Pyramid represents the number of days in an Earth year then one average side of the wall around the pyramid represents the sum of 1 Earth Year and 1 Mars Year in Earth Days ... now that is totally amazing yet again. ... Cheers Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 17, 2018 22:17:13 GMT 5
But we aren't done, not by a longhsot. If we think back to some of our other work we will remember that 365.25 + 686.98 = 1052.221 and just to refresh your memory here is what we have ... So we have earlier proven that the mean of the three pyramid at Giza equals Mars + Earth so therefore the side of the enclosure wall, when the height is allowed to represent Earth (in earth days) also must equal the mean of the three pyramids ... awesome ... and of course the diagram ... Maybe more tomorrow ... Cheers Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 17, 2018 22:57:18 GMT 5
And just something I thought of as I went to turn in. AND IT TURNED OUT TO BE COMPLETELY WRONG ... oh well
Cheers Don Barone



Post by Charlotte on Apr 18, 2018 7:45:12 GMT 5
And just something I thought of as I went to turn in. AND IT TURNED OUT TO BE COMPLETELY WRONG ... oh well Cheers Don Barone Scare us why don't you, Don



Post by Don Barone on Apr 18, 2018 9:32:58 GMT 5
Hi Charlotte always nice to see a post from you and comforting to know you are following along. Okay this is as far as I know a suggestion that has not been mentioned by anyone before but it has sort of sat in the back of my mind for a while and now seems as good a time as any to bring it up for discussion [if only there was someone to discuss it with ] First let me post this piece from Petrie's book about the angles of The Bent Pyramid ... It has always troubled me that the angle seemed to change in both the upper and lower parts of this pyramid. For the longest time I had speculated to myself that the only possible reason for this, other than blaming shoddy workmanship is that is was planned that way. But to what end ? Well I had long speculated that what was actually being shown was an arc or part of a circle and that is why the angle of slope kept changing. Here is an exaggerated view of what I mean. The arcs and purple lines showing the tangents to the arc and the resulting change in angles . One of these days I will try to calculate the radii of the circles but that will be another days work. On to the business of today . Now to emphasize here the angles of the top pyramid are according to Petrie anywhere from 42 degrees 39 minutes at it's least to 43 degrees 24 minutes at it's greatest so that gives a lot of leeway as to what the correct angle could be but I think it is telling that the angle decreases as we go up and to me this indicates we could be dealing with an arc. But as I said on with new business. I had been trying to figure out what the base of the upper pyramid could be. I had tried to maybe make it fit to our G1 distance of 4916.6 and this would make it 4916.6 / 2 or 2458.3 / 20.62 = 119.22 cubits and with our established height of 110.102 we get a ratio or tan of 110.102 / 119.22 = 0.923526 or angle of 42.72 or 42 degrees 43.4 minutes and actually does fit within the tolerances so that indeed could be a possibility. However I felt it had to be maybe more dramatic and so I decided to scale Petrie's drawing to see if I could get a clue from this. When I scaled the side of the base of the pyramid in comparison to the upper base of the smaller pyramid I found that they were roughly about 1 to 1.52 ratio and that led me to my next diagram. For the umpteenth time I will show that the semi major axis of Mars (227,939,100 km) divided by the semi major axis of Earth (149,598,261 km) gives us 1.5236748 so I decided to see what our Petrie plan would yield and so taking as the average of the pyramid proper at 7460 and dividing by 1.5236748 we get ... 4896 inches ... so allow me to clearly state what I am proposing. If we call the base of the pyramid as the semi major axis of Mars then 4896 inches would equal Earth's semi major axis. Does it fit ? Well ... this would make the base of the top pyramid 4896 and half that base would be 2448 inches and that would be 118.72 cubits and give us the ratio of 118.72 / 110.102 and give us tan 0.9274005 and the angle of 42 degrees 50.57 minutes and again certainly within the parameters allowed by Petrie's own notes ... very interesting as always I say. So if it is meant to be an arc for both the top and the bottom slope then the number of possible right angles is unlimited ... And of course the image ... And what it represents so if we actually call 7460 as twice the semi major axis of Mars or the diameter of the resulting orbit then the resulting circle is indeed the circular orbit of Mars and we get this breath taking diagram below ... And we are now able to see graphically why The Ben Ben stone would have been sacred and even actually Ra himself ... The Sun God ... it is truly remarkable but it continues with this next image. So from above we see The Sun, The Earth and Mars all in their proper position ratio wise in The Solar System but it gets even more remarkable that when we view The Bent Pyramid from the side it takes us even further into the cosmos when it takes us from Mars to Ceres ... So what do we have here. It defies belief. We have The Sun God Ra shining down and as his warmth and as his rays spread he defines the planet circles of Earth and then Mars but then The Ancient Builders in their infinite wisdom used the three dimensional aspect of the pyramid, for let's face it it is a 3 dimensional object and they went into the depth of it to show the rest of the solar system out to Ceres. Two dimension show Earth and Mars and into the 3rd dimension to show Mars and Ceres. It is I think, if I am correct, a monumental design and I hate to say it, worthy of only ... The Gods ! Cheers Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 18, 2018 10:27:40 GMT 5
Okay so now I decided to see how the outer wall fit into all of this because I remain feeling that nothing these Ancient Builders ever did was done for just the exercise and this is what i found. It really sometimes to me is very troubling to see all of this come together. If it is not really there then why do I keep seeing it ? We shall deal with those thoughts later but now to the amazing final beauty of The Bent Pyramid ... I tried to figure out how the wall fit in and fit in it did in a way I don't think I ever expected but as I said fit it did. Here is the remarkable final image at The bent Pyramid complex ... It really doesn't get any better or more beautiful than this ... I wanted to see if the ratio between 7460 and 11760 would yield anything else, another planet ? a ratio we could use ? ... I honestly wasn't expecting or can almost not believe what it showed ... Here is the diagram ... So what is so special about this image, this purple circle ? Well ... it is, when the large square of the pyramid is equal to the semi major axis of Mars at 227,939,100, amazingly 360,000,000 kilometers.
I had of late been wondering why is the distance of the west side of the enclosure wall out so much. We have: Why was the west side 11772.9 and different than the others of around 11755 or so. Well as usual nothing The Ancient Builders did was without reason and I found that 11772.9 divided by 7453.4 and I got ... 1.579534172324. I at first thought maybe half of Pi but no that was not it and so it was that I multiplied 227,939,100 for was it not 7453.4 that was representing the semi major axis of Mars by 1.579534172324 . Now the answer I got was so far removed what I expected that it is difficult to conceive of the kind of minds that could have designed and built this ... for we find that the distance of 11772.9 when 7453.4 (actually to be exact 7454.178 ) equals the semi major axis of Mars is ... 360,000,000 km ... How nice and fitting is this ? Got to love those Ancient Builders. Cheers Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 18, 2018 10:38:48 GMT 5
Okay so if this exercise showed us anything it is that we must look at the pyramids from two different angles ... from the side but also we must look at them from above ... so I will have to take another look at The Great Pyramid with that in mind ... and again no Venus ... where is Venus in all of this ? A good question. Is it perhaps because it wasn't there yet ?
cheers db



Post by Don Barone on Apr 18, 2018 14:35:00 GMT 5
Okie dokie folks ... are you still with me ? It is almost time to put The Bent Pyramid to bed and into the "done" column but first this last bit of closure we need to do this. If you can remember I found it interesting that if Earth was 12 then Neptune was ALMOST 360. I couldn't help but feel that it should have been and possibly could have been when the solar system first formed or maybe where it is going to end up but when I saw the 360,000,000 well I immediately thought of Neptune and what follows is based on those thoughts ... Who among you have not wondered why the heck is Neptune not a nice simple number like 4,500,000,000 (4.5 billion) kilometers from the Earth ? The estimates for it's semi major axis range from 4.498 billion to 4.503 billion so it is more than possible that it is indeed 4.5 billion. And who among us have not said to ourselves why the devil is Earth's semi major axis not a nice simple number to remember like 150,000,000 kilometers ... especially since the orbit varies from 147,000,000 to 152,000,000 it is indeed actually exactly 150,000,000 kilometers from The Sun every single orbit. And so it is that I became a "rounder" one of those misguided number crunchers who use rounding to prove a point, shame on me. Regardless it illustrates the point I am trying to make. I just felt that the distance 360,000,000 was trying to represent Neptune and so it was that since it was trying to be Neptune let's see what it could show us and so I simply divided 360,000,000 by 4,500,000,000 and got 0.08 and so to see what Earth could represent I multiplied this by the rounded 150,000,000 and got 12,000,000 or 1/30th or reversed it was 30. Now if we think of a 360 degree circle then 30 is precisely 1/12th of the circle so I decided to multiply 12,000,000 by 10 and got 120,000,000 and instead of 0.033333 I got 0.33 or 1/3rd of 120 degrees of a 360 degree circle and so it was that I went to Google Earth and drew "great circles" from the pole to the pyramids and to the equator and came up with these diagrams. but something was off and wrong with this image so I went back and this time I drew in the equator as well and realized that on a globe if one of these two lines is straight then the other is curved or is an arc. Observe ... However now when I drew in the 30 degree and 120 degree lines it all made perfect sense and the reason the Bent Pyramid was built becomes or became at least to me crystal clear ... and here is my final image. I really don't see how I could possibility come up with a better solar system explanation than this. I hope you all have enjoyed the ride . The Finale: ... and I guess as they say, now you have the rest of the story. Cheers Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 18, 2018 14:45:29 GMT 5
Oh dear ... the little pyramid ...



Post by Don Barone on Apr 18, 2018 17:24:21 GMT 5
Hi all ... you knew I wasn't done didn't you ? I mean how could I leave the poor old Red Pyramid to languish out there all by itself.I mean really whoever designed these three pyramids, Meidum, The Bent and The Red Pyramids did so with a singular plan in mind. Shall we close that last little chapter ? Firstly we need to figure out what the distance is between them. An extremely tricky business because I keep getting different answers depending on what program is used. Then we have the problem of are we getting the correct coordinates of these pyramids. I know for The Great Pyramid there are several different ones listed. Petrie has it at 6702 feet however a gentleman at Graham's who has done this for quite a while gets 6748 feet when scaling it from Google Earth. I get about 6755 feet so I really don't know what number to use. I just find it hard to believe that Petrie would be out so much so I figured I would just split the difference of 6748 + 6702 = 6725 = + or  If anyone can come up with the absolute correct number PLEASE LET ME KNOW ! Okay this number is critical in order to bring closure to our solar system. So we have the height of The Bent Pyramid at 4082.55 inches and we have the distance to The Red Pyramid as ABOUT 6725 feet or 6725 x 12 = 80700 inches. The logical next step was to divide our height of 4082.55 into 80700 to see what we got ... and we got 19.767057354. Well now so what ? Well since the height we were using took us to the base of the pyramid proper and that represented Mars I figured why not multiply it by the semi major axis of Mars. Well if truth be known I tried Earth first and got nowhere Well so what did I get ... I guess I shouldn't have been surprised but I was anyway ... The semi major axis of Mars and well documented why we call this distance Mars of 227,939,100 times 19.767057354 gives us ... surely you guys and gals know what it is going to be by now ... it is ... 4 505,685,263 ... IT IS NEPTUNE SHOWN TO SCALE . I stand humbled before Sneferu or whoever gave him the plans and the ideas. Here is the image. Because of it's size I have linked to the actual large scale image and have just put a shrunken version here. and the link to the large full scale image ... You know upon reflection one has to wonder how I can see this and no one else can or could even remotely see this as a possibility. So really, honestly what does that mean ? Well it could simply mean that I really should have wrote that book about those Ancient Astronauts who came to Earth and built the pyramids to commemorate their voyages through our solar system OR it is actually there. But if it (my theories) are there HOW are they there. Who or what and especially when were these markers built. If it really was Sneferu then who was he really and how did he know that this was marking our solar system ? Or is it as my detractors would have it just one giant coincidence after coincidence after coincidence . The answer I guess, as Cat Stevens sung many years ago, lies within so why not take a look now, pick up pick up pick up a Good Book now ... I don't know about you but I don't think I will ever be able to look at Dashur and The Bent and The Red and The Meidum Pyramids again without seeing our solar system. Again and again I ask myself ... how ? How did they know ... how did they ... how did ... how Best Regards Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 18, 2018 17:39:40 GMT 5
And just a very quick addendum to the above post. According to Wiki and this was on many, many websites all over the net the semi major axis distance to Neptune was 4,503,443,661 km Now if we do the math again we get 4,503,443,661 / 227,939,100 and we get 19.75722314 and if we multiply by our height in inches we get ... 80659.85 and this is inches so in feet we get 80659.85 / 12 = 6721.65 and a little closer ... Regards Don barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 20, 2018 6:14:36 GMT 5
Ok as always a bit of a kink in the chain of evidence. The perimeter I used for the top only works if we use perimeter of sides 4896 but then that makes each half side 2448 inches and thus 188.72 cubits but the best Petrie can give us 2443 and divided by 20.62 gives us 118.477 in total out about 5 inches ... not bad but I am working on a visual presentation that might explain this discrepancy. Last night I was thinking how could I graphically illustrate part of The Bent Pyramid and it's relationship to both the numbers and the solar system and came up with this diagram. Note here that if we divide top and bottom by square root of 3 we get 1 and sq rt 2 / sq rt 3 ... As a side note here if one were to concede that The Giza P rectangle was indeed sq rt of 3 by sq rt of 2 the vertical could be said to be Mars and horizontal could be said to be Ceres ... just something to think about until we get there again ... and we most certainly will. Cheers Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 20, 2018 19:58:14 GMT 5
Hi all I worked on it all day and I thought I had it but it did not fit so I still can't show you where the missing pyramids are ... very frustrating . I did figure out that The Red is EXACTLY the same as the top of of The Bent and were the top portion of the Bent allowed to be completed it would have been identical. And since the top portion of The Bent we decided was Mars then obviously The Red is Mars as well and further proof is provided by the base length which is 8660.25 and 5000 times sq rt of 3 ( 5000 x 1.732050807 = 8660.25 ) I thought if I only need to go 8660.25 x Pi to get 27206.98 inches and convert to feet = 2267.25. Now total was 6714 and minus 2267.25 = 4446.75 and times 12 gives us in inches 53361.02 ... Actual of Uranus is 2,876,679,082 with furthest being 3006925046.1 ... if we divide 227,939,100 into either one we get 13.19179 for furthest and 12.620384 while doing the math for 53,361.02 / 4082.52 (height of Bent) gives us 13.0706729 and somewhere in between and I can't seem to figure out why ?
Any ideas ?
But we have concluded both of these pyramids represent Mars.
A couple of questions spring to mind ... Where are the other planets ... where is Venus ... and most important why the fixation with Mars ?
Could really use some help on this ..
db



Post by Don Barone on Apr 21, 2018 17:20:10 GMT 5
Hi all here is the latest update ... and I honestly hope you will forgive me .
For those who remember back to my earlier research on the paintings of Poussin and The Rennes le Chateau mysteries I was continually told to write it down in a book (mainly by my daughter) ... well as we all know I didn't and we we also know what the end result was ... Dan Brown became a bizzillionaire. Some felt that he had stole my ideas among others so this time I have cut my postings off and any further revelations and conjecture (and they are numerous) will stop. I am about to start a project with my daughter a budding author (4 novels published in the now defunct author of the month book writing contest) and school teacher. I have not decided yet whether i will charge or not ... I assure you it is unique, it is new and it reveals an awful lot of ancient Egypt speculation ... I honestly wish I could post more here but the Dan Brown fiasco has left a sour taste in my mouth as well.
Cheers until the book signing ..
Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 22, 2018 7:57:16 GMT 5
Just can't help myself but since this is already in the public domain allow me to possibly set the possible origin of base of The Pyramid at Meidum for you. Which came first I will leave up to you. All our live we have been told that The Pyramid of Meidum is 175 cubits high and 275 cubits wide at the base USING A CUBIT OF 20.67 INCHES. Petrie as I said was a good surveyor but couldn't see beyond the end of his nose when it came to figuring out what was going on with these pyramids he measured. Case in point: I have claimed that the base of The Pyramid at Meidum WAS NOT 275 CUBITS but was in fact 275.5577 cubits and now comes perhaps a new way to prove this ... here again are the sizes of The Pyramid at Meidum ... Okay so now I will show you the amazing correlation between Giza and Dashur yet again. And as always the inch tells the true tale ... My proposed base at The Great Pyramid is 9068.9968 (at least one of them) and times four to get total is 36275.9864 and now for the cleverness of The Ancient Builders ... if we show the reciprocal of this we get ... 2.7566445e5 and multiplied by 10,000,000 we get 275.66 and if we call these cubits we get for a base length of 275.66 x 20.66 = 5684.2 and fitting amazingly within the scope of measurements shown. IF WE USE 9072 INCHES AND DO THE SAME EXERCISE WE GET 275.59 TIMES 20.62 AND WE GET 5682.32 AND WELL WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF CALLING IT SPOT ON (3/10THS OF AN INCH ) All in all I would say there was indeed something going on here ... cheers Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 22, 2018 9:32:47 GMT 5
Hi all ... well this morning it finally happened ... I found the absolute proof that was lacking that ties all the pyramids of Egypt together. It is simply mind blowing and I really don't know what to think of the final solution, why did I find it and not someone else ? The only thing I can think of is several factors the first being my absolute belief that the solar system was designed as simply as possible. My second belief is that The Ancients knew this and wanted to show us so they designed it into their pyramids. And lastly my obsessive search for meaning within the numbers of both the pyramids and the solar system. It is at this point that I wish to post a quote about Kepler a totally under sung genius who started this all happening. Here is the quote:
It can be said of Kepler, as of few great scientists, that what he accomplished would never have been done had he himself not done it. The discovery from the examination of nakedeye observational reports that planets move on ellipses, and according to the area law, is so exceedingly improbable – and Kepler’s manner of arriving at it was so decidedly personal – that it lies outside the course of any inevitable development.
Bruce Stephenson Kepler’s Physical Astronomy, 1987
My point of posting this is not to put myself in Kepler's league but to simply say that in my personal opinion that had I not been the one to discover this it would literally never have been discovered. You might think that this is brash and egotistical of me but honestly when you see what I have found you will stand in awe, not of me but the Ancient Builder who built it and The Creator who designed and built the original blueprint, our solar system.
I am thinking of scrapping the book and simply posting my results here. I could use the money but hell what good is it. My children won't need it as when I go they will be fine. So give me a while to think on it and if I do decide to post it here ... please fasten your seat belts ... this is going to be the ride of our lives and it is beyond doubt the pinnacle of my studies ...
Regards Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 22, 2018 13:15:34 GMT 5
Okay I have decided ... to hell with the book. Let's go for it. For those who are familiar with my work back in 1998 I went through a Kundalini of sorts and posted many bizarre things least of which was this ... (good thing I never threw anything out ) Even back then I was thinking of my book ... Here is a link I made about the pyramid and the circle. Made a bit of sense then but is crystal clear to me now ... Circle and PyramidI will let you refresh those pages in your mind before going on with the final understanding of what I was trying to say ... Back soon ... Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 22, 2018 14:10:08 GMT 5
Okay let's rev it up a notch or two.
In Ancient Egypt (and elsewhere) there was always more than one god, there was usually a lot of them, In Egypt there was 8 and in Greek and Roman times there were 12. We have been taught to believe that they were really not at all what they really were. Not sure if that made sense ... but let's look at Egypt first ... They had The Ogoad ... The OGDOAD were the eight original beings before there were any beings. They come in husbandwife pairs: HUH and HAUHET, the rulers of infinity, KUK and KAUKET, the rulers of darkness, NUN and NAUNET, the rulers of primordial waters, and the secretive AMUN and AMAUNET, who rule hidden things. We are going to meet what I think these gods really were and I think you will either be pleasantly surprised or call me a lunatic. Either way I will be happy for this idea, as far as I know, has never, ever been suggested before. In Rome and Greece there were 12 gods and I shall suggest an alternative view for them as well. But first ( this is very difficult to get in the correct order of posting) it all goes back to a couple of discoveries I made. The first was that The Great Pyramid was in the precise ratio to The Pyramid of Khafre of the square root of 3 to Phi and the second amazing simple thing I discovered (along with Little Tommy on my blog) was that Earth and Mercury were in the precise relationship of 12 to 31 that is if we divide Mercury's semi major axis by 12 and then multiply by 31 we get exactly the semi major axis of Earth to a precision of 8/ten millionths. These were the tools I had and from these I slowly built a complex idea of what was going on in Egypt. Another discovery I found was that if we allow the semi major axis of Mars to equal the square root of 3 then the distance to Ceres was precisely equal to the square root of two. (Notice a pattern here yet folks ?) And lastly and we had noted this before the ratio Mars to Jupiter was one to the square root of 2 plus 2 or 1:3.4142135623731 where Mars semi major axis equals 1 and Jupiter's semi major axis is 3.14142135623731 times further away. I was slowly building up the solar system having never gone higher than the sq rt of 2 + 2. Okay to the meat of my new theory ... In my book as you saw I posted that I had gone in search of The God Pi and The God Phi and actually had a chapter entitled ... Are there other Gods ? Amazingly even back there I must have somehow known deep inside where this would all end up. Okay so now let's find the first of our Gods, The top of The God Tree and second only to the actual Creator God who shall and always will remain unknown. The first God is ... THE POINT ! yes that's correct I said THE POINT. that point at the center of a circle and the point at the tip of a pyramid. It is our first God for without it none of the other "Gods" can come into being ... And for those who might doubt this suggestion was it not the circle with the dot that represented God ? Now you know why.
All through history it has historically been the number 7 that took precedent over all the other. here are but a few:
THE SEVEN GODS ... OF CREATION. THE SEVEN STEPS TO HEAVEN THE SEVEN LAYERS AT THE STEP PYRAMID THE SEVEN DEADLY SINS THE SEVEN VEILS LUCKY NUMBER 7 THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN
I am sure you can come up with a zillion others and something I had never noticed until now here is what is written in game of Thrones . and about THE SEVEN KINGDOMS:
Faith of the Seven The Faith of the Seven, often simply referred to to as the Faith, is the dominant religion in most of the Seven Kingdoms. Followers of the Faith in the north are rare and are generally not found on the Iron Islands, where the religions of the old gods of the First Men and of the Drowned God respectively are still strong. The gods of the Faith are sometimes known as the new gods to differentiate them from the old gods from the north.
and of course there was ...
"What's your designation?" "Seven of Nine, Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 01. But you may call me Seven of Nine."– Kathryn Janeway and Seven of Nine, 2374
and this about who the gods are in Game of Thrones ...
The Seven (also known as the God of Seven, the SevenFaced God, or the New Gods) is the deity of the Faith of the Seven, the dominant religion of the Seven Kingdoms.
Okay so now I have tried to prove a case for there being another seven gods other than THE POINT so what could they be ...
Well ... how about ...
THE POINT ... AMUN IN EGYPT AND ANU IN MESOPOTAMIA
THE FIRST OF COURSE IS 1
SQUARE ROOT OF 2 .... (1.4142135623730950488016887242097) ... AND AS I POSTED SO VERY LONG AGO ... THE ORIGINAL SINE ... NOT SIN
SQUARE ROOT OF 3 ... (1.7320508075688772935274463415059)
SQUARE ROOT OF 4 (2) ... 2.00000000
SQUARE ROOT OF 5 ..... (2.2360679774997896964091736687313) (Isis)
AND IT'S (HER) CHILD PHI ! .... (1.6180339887498948482045868343656) (Baby Horus)
AND THEN OF COURSE 2 ... (2.000000000000000 )
AND FINALLY THE GOD PI .... (3.14159265358979323846264338327950) (I begin to think this wasn't a God at all )
So how in the world did I come up with such an amazingly insane idea ... well ... the pyramids told me !
Best regards Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 22, 2018 14:56:31 GMT 5
Okay I am excited ... how about you folks ? Okay so in the above post you will note that I have labeled the square root of 5 as Isis and Baby Horus is Phi becasue sq rt of 5 is the only number that begets Phi and so by simple logic it is only created when we add 1 to it and divide by two and so logic dictates that 1 must be Osiris ... How nice and neat and closured is that ?
So we are building up our Gods of Ancient Egypt
Point = Amun or AMEN = The Sun 1 = Osiris = Earth sq rt of 2 = Ceres ? sq rt of 5 = Isis = Venus Phi = Baby Horus The most commonly encountered family relationship describes Horus as the son of Isis and Osiris, and he plays a key role in the Osiris myth as Osiris's heir and the rival to Set, = Mercury sq rt of 3 = Mars = ? sq rt of 4 = 2 = The Moon and Thoth ? Pi = Set = ?
How am I doing ?
Cheers Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 22, 2018 15:16:19 GMT 5
Above post has been revised as all the myths say that Set was Horus' rival and they continually fought and over the years I have found that it is always either close to Phi or close to Pi so they have as I posted so long ago always been at "war" with each other to see which reality will win. A reality of Phi or a reality of Pi. Since I don't now or really never have believed in a perfect circle and you can geometrically find and create Phi I therefore conclude that Pi is Set who lost the battle to Horus who is Phi ...
I like that. Makes perfect sense to me.
Cheers Don Barone



Post by Don Barone on Apr 22, 2018 17:07:03 GMT 5
Okay so now we are going to explore first why The Pyramids were said to be home to the gods or gateway to the gods and later we will see the true meaning of Mount Olympus and also Asgard, for amazingly I think it all ties together. Okay here we go ... If the Pyramids are home to the gods then logic must dictate that we find them within the structure. They must be there for us to see ... and may Ra have mercy on my soul ... THEY ARE ! Okay before we do that why don't we draw our Gods ... actually a lot easier than most would expect .... Here they are ... Okay so now allow me to show you how I have come to the conclusions I have and in the process, I believe, have totally solved the mysteries of The Pyramids of Ancient Egypt. One of the keys believe it or not was my discovery of the 12 and 31 numbers (31 is 13 backwards. Is this why the number 13 was unlucky ? Should it have been reversed ? ) and the fact that they were the ratio of Mercury and Earth, So why don't we draw that ... and label it ... and from earlier research we can do this to the diagram ... With base Phi + 2 and height 200 draw the resulting pyramid IN RED Next divide "The Red Pyramid" by two of our gods ... Mars and Ceres With the intersection of The Mars/Ceres borderline now established finish the out side pyramid meeting those points ... Draw a line around half of each pyramid ... BEHOLD THE BENT PYRAMID AS MEASURED BY THE GODS OF ANCIENT EGYPT BUT NOW BEHOLD THE MAGIC AND SPLENDOR OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM REVEALED ... AND Emhotep Don Barone

