### Post by Don Barone on Jun 9, 2017 19:31:41 GMT -5

Hi all ... well last night I made a unique breakthrough that has allowed me to draw to scale all the inner planets

And with or without any rulers, or measurement systems of any kind. I am going to try to keep this as simple as I can but this time please if there is anything you do not understand, please break with tradition and ask me questions. You will note that I have named this new solar system design I have found

Over the years I have used the Giza Rectangle as my template and one of the main criticism of my work by some of the learned over at Ma'at and other sites is that this Giza Rectangle I chose was completely arbitrary and would fluctuate dependent on the angle for True North chosen as pointed out by the discrepancies in Petrie's and Dash's measurements. I tried to ignore their criticism but deep down I think I knew they might be right but until last night's "revelation" I had no idea in which other direction to go. So to start with this time we are going back to the basics. We are going back the what is there ... we are going back to just the three pyramids as I show in this new diagram of mine ...

Well so far no one can argue with that

We are now going to do something unique and again is an exclusive discovery of mine. We are not going to measure them, at least not yet. We are going to use √3, √2 and Pi, three concepts that any "civilization" should be familiar with. We will come up with a completely new measurement number and since I once called myself this on certain boards and the fact that the poor guy wandered in the desert for this many years, we will call it a "Moses" and we will allow it just for now to equal 40 "cubits". And we find that is appears to be extremely close, but maybe not exactly in the ratio of base = 11 and height = 7. So let us make Pyramid Giza 1 as base of 440 "cubits" ( or 11 " Moses' " )

Here is that diagram ...

Okay but what to with the other pyramids ? Using the "cubit" ( 40 of them in a Moses ) we find that the other pyramids measure 411.00 and 201.5 respectively and when we use inches we get 4154.3 and 8472 inches.

Still not a lot of arguments can be started so far. Maybe an inch or two here and there and of course the age old argument of how many inches in a cubit ...

Rather than go into a long drawn out explanation of a theory most of you know all too well I will simply post an image for you to refer to:

So where was the initial breakthrough ? It was the simple formula:

2

and miraculously once we multiply by 10,000 we get the number of the units we call inches in the base of The Great Pyramid (9068.9968)

So using this simply formula of √3 and Pi we have come up with a number that EXACTLY EQUALS the number of inches in the base of "Pyramid Giza 1" (Great Pyramid) This works because if the height is 5773.50 base will be 9068.9968. The diagram below shows us how this is achieved:

Please note that the perimeter of the enclosed square is 1000 x √2 or 1414.21356 with sides of 1000 x √2 then divided by 4 to get 353.5534

The actual measurement of Base Pyramid Giza 1 is 9068.9968 "whatevers" and is defined by the formula:

Pi

--- / √3

2

More very soon ....

**WITH OR WITHOUT THE GIZA RECTANGLE !!!!!!!!**And with or without any rulers, or measurement systems of any kind. I am going to try to keep this as simple as I can but this time please if there is anything you do not understand, please break with tradition and ask me questions. You will note that I have named this new solar system design I have found

__. I have done this for one simple reason. Clive Ross alone was instrumental in first suggesting this theory that within The Giza Plateau and Giza Rectangle was "The World's Oldest Book of Astronomy". Few believed him and many laughed at him. I must admit at first I thought he was nuts but as I studied his figures and numbers I started to believe he was correct. Over the years many times I went on record stating time will prove both Clive and myself correct. Perhaps that time has come. You can be the judge. And to Clive all I can say is thank you! Thank you for starting the eye opening process for when you see where it has ended you will simply stare at it, shake your head and mutter to yourself ... but how did they know ?__**"The Clive Ross Memorial Solar System"****The Beginning:**

Over the years I have used the Giza Rectangle as my template and one of the main criticism of my work by some of the learned over at Ma'at and other sites is that this Giza Rectangle I chose was completely arbitrary and would fluctuate dependent on the angle for True North chosen as pointed out by the discrepancies in Petrie's and Dash's measurements. I tried to ignore their criticism but deep down I think I knew they might be right but until last night's "revelation" I had no idea in which other direction to go. So to start with this time we are going back to the basics. We are going back the what is there ... we are going back to just the three pyramids as I show in this new diagram of mine ...

Well so far no one can argue with that

We are now going to do something unique and again is an exclusive discovery of mine. We are not going to measure them, at least not yet. We are going to use √3, √2 and Pi, three concepts that any "civilization" should be familiar with. We will come up with a completely new measurement number and since I once called myself this on certain boards and the fact that the poor guy wandered in the desert for this many years, we will call it a "Moses" and we will allow it just for now to equal 40 "cubits". And we find that is appears to be extremely close, but maybe not exactly in the ratio of base = 11 and height = 7. So let us make Pyramid Giza 1 as base of 440 "cubits" ( or 11 " Moses' " )

Here is that diagram ...

Okay but what to with the other pyramids ? Using the "cubit" ( 40 of them in a Moses ) we find that the other pyramids measure 411.00 and 201.5 respectively and when we use inches we get 4154.3 and 8472 inches.

Still not a lot of arguments can be started so far. Maybe an inch or two here and there and of course the age old argument of how many inches in a cubit ...

Rather than go into a long drawn out explanation of a theory most of you know all too well I will simply post an image for you to refer to:

So where was the initial breakthrough ? It was the simple formula:

**Pi**

--- / √3=--- / √3

**0.90689968**2

and miraculously once we multiply by 10,000 we get the number of the units we call inches in the base of The Great Pyramid (9068.9968)

So using this simply formula of √3 and Pi we have come up with a number that EXACTLY EQUALS the number of inches in the base of "Pyramid Giza 1" (Great Pyramid) This works because if the height is 5773.50 base will be 9068.9968. The diagram below shows us how this is achieved:

Please note that the perimeter of the enclosed square is 1000 x √2 or 1414.21356 with sides of 1000 x √2 then divided by 4 to get 353.5534

**SO I ARGUE THAT THE MEASUREMENT OF THE GREAT PYRAMID IS NOT 9072 INCHES OR 9068.4 INCHES OR 9069 INCHES ... THOSE ARE JUST CO-INCIDENCES !**

The actual measurement of Base Pyramid Giza 1 is 9068.9968 "whatevers" and is defined by the formula:

Pi

--- / √3

2

**It is the inch which is the coincidence not the other way around !!!!!!!**

More very soon ....