|
Post by Don Barone on Jul 12, 2015 9:29:02 GMT -5
Here is my latest attempt to simplify things. I will eventually post it here but ran out of time yesterday. It is entitled "From Whence Comes The Measurements ?" Enjoy ! From Whence Comes The MeasurementsCheers Don
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Jul 13, 2015 8:57:21 GMT -5
I remember those images
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Jul 13, 2015 21:24:12 GMT -5
Here is Part II. I am working on trying the KISS principle of "Keep it simple stupid." I hope I am achieving this. If there any parts that are not crystal clear please let me know as I want everybody to understand and see how simple this is. I have kept the math to a minimum this time around and will try to use images for they say one image is worth a thousand words. Please enjoy From Whence Comes The Measurements Part II Cheers and I will write that book yet Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Jul 14, 2015 7:33:47 GMT -5
No secret that to me simple is 'numberless'. I like the quotes apropos Mercury, Hermes, and Thoth, and that the GP represents Mercury in terms of being messenger of the gods, what it reveals. Mercury is also said to be the Messenger to the gods, an Intercessor.
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Jul 16, 2015 11:01:48 GMT -5
Hi all (all three of you that is ) Here is my latest image. I don't think explanations are needed but I will do a website to go along with this diagram. This is the end result of all of the previous images and work I have been doing. Here is the full size image ... Full size imageCheers Don
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Jul 16, 2015 11:41:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Jul 16, 2015 14:10:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Jul 17, 2015 7:36:15 GMT -5
A Divine Design affirmed by Hermes: Egypt as a copy of Heaven, and who could argue with the Trice Great. I can't even argue with you apropos number. The Solar System being by Divine Design implies the Cosmos and all within it, by Divine Design.
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Jul 22, 2015 10:11:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Jul 22, 2015 13:40:41 GMT -5
More has been added to the link. Please keep checking as I will be building on it. Cheers Don
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Jul 23, 2015 11:45:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Aug 1, 2015 0:00:33 GMT -5
Hi all ... I have continued my study of our solar system looking for an easy way to plot Mars using the diameters of Mercury and Mars itself and came up with this. It is I think ... well you have a look and tell me. ASSUMPTION # 1 ... The distance from The Sun to Jupiter is by default 10,000 times the square root of 2 or 10,000 times 1.41421356 or 14142.1356 CUBITS !!!!! WHAT FOLLOWS ... Using this as a given we can see in the diagram that the distance from Mars to Jupiter is equal to precisely 10,000 cubits and the distance from The Sun to Mars is 4142.1356 cubits
Following that we can see that the distance from The Sun to Mercury is 1052.33 cubits or 201.46 (P3) + 411.04 (P2) + 439.83 (Perfect Pi base for G1)
I then scaled and placed The Giza Rectangle on the diagram in order to plot Venus. (One circle is 9/11ths of the distance to Mars and the second is what is left from the diagonal of the approximate 9 by 11 rectangle)
It is a pretty simple way to plot the first 6 planets and it is an easy one to remember as well.
Cheers Don
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Aug 1, 2015 8:26:17 GMT -5
Hi all ... I have mentioned this before but I think this diagram makes it hit home a little clearer and a little more exciting. May I present "The Great Pyramid Solar System" Cheers Don
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Aug 1, 2015 9:18:50 GMT -5
I was struggling to find an easy way to plot Ceres and then I discovered this. I had already discovered that Ceres is almost exactly 10 times away from The Sun as is the distance between Venus and Earth. And then realizing that this 1 unit was actually 2/11ths of the distance to Mars ... see diagram below. Cheers and boy they really knew how to keep it simple back in those olden days when Imhotep was building the pyramids. Don
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Aug 1, 2015 11:28:37 GMT -5
And to make it graphically simple as 1, 2 , 3 , square root that is may I present The Kiss Design of The Giza Solar System. Please note here that using Mars as the origin point and 9 units as a radius we define the place of Ceres. And if we use the opposite point west of Mars at 9 units and scribe an arc to intersect our hypotenuse we have defined the distance to Venus. All in all a very neat, simple way of looking at our solar system and is it any wonder that The Ancients would have known this. Here is a very neat diagram but there is still more. Cheers Don
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Aug 1, 2015 15:56:56 GMT -5
Hi all we have all seen how the floor of "The King's Chamber" represents the semi major axis of Mars when we allow the height of The Great Pyramid of 280 cubits equal Jupiter. Here is that image. Mars equals 82.01 cubits And now a second image. This shows what happens when we show height of The Great Pyramid of 280 cubits equaling the semi major axis distance to Ceres. Here is that image. But you know what these two diagrams can be combined in a most ingenious way and will I think lend credence to my earlier thoughts that The King's Chamber represented Mars for if we do the simple math we find that Mars in the latter diagram in scale is 154 cubits from "The Sun". Now when we combine the two images we see Mars escaping up the shafts and exiting and the 154 cubit point. It is a pretty neat concept to show our solar system and as usual I found it in plain sight at Giza. Here is a flash presentation showing the outcome. Mars two faceAnd here is the final image. Note how the Great Pyramid and our solar system lends itself to such a simplistic diagram layover. It is very neat. Cheers Don
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Aug 2, 2015 8:29:30 GMT -5
Order in the Universe, informing and beautiful, Don, thank you. Whence this "Divine Design?" From a Diviner, "of or relating to a god, especially a Supreme Being. dictionary.reference.com/browse/diviner
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Aug 2, 2015 12:48:38 GMT -5
Hi Charlotte and thank you. Yes it is as simplistic as possible. I mean really who would have thought that all you have to do is divide the distance to Ceres by 20, multiply by 11 and you have the distance to Mars and doing the same thing with The Great Pyramid you get the exit of the shafts for the King's Chamber. Any even more exciting I think I have finally deciphered a website of Clive's and should now be able to nicely tie it into all this previous work of mine. Clive did a website where he showed how the Great Pyramid showed the alignment of Mars and Jupiter over the course of time and now I think I am ready to tie it into my own work. Here is the first image. Please note that any image posted from Clive's websites are copyrighted to the estate of The Late Clive Ross. What Clive has shown is that Jupiter is where the shafts meet above and Mars is where the shafts meet below and he has put The Sun where the two angles split meet. It is a profound thought. I had also done this but never thought to include the planets ... UNTIL NOW ! Here is an early image of mine. Oops I have been side tracked with other thoughts which can not wait. It is, I fear, shades of a Tsunami ... quite large I think. Back in a few moments.
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Aug 2, 2015 14:17:31 GMT -5
Hi Charlotte many thoughts are coming at the moment but this was triggered by an old image I came across as I was searching for the image to post above. This will eventually, I think, convince some that there can be little doubt that the planets are indeed encoded in the pyramids of Egypt. Here is an image (2 views of it), I don't know how I did not see this before. I love it ! But the next one will be even better. The ratio between Jupiter and Saturn is indeed 9 to 11 and unbelievably Earth is 1/9th of Saturn and 1/11th of Jupiter and lastly and to make it even more profound the diameter of The Earth is 12756.28 kilometers and divide it by 9 and we get 1417.36 for all intents and purposes the width of The Giza Rectangle. But this one is almost a better inspiration. I really don't know how I did not see these before. But it also gives us this ... I mean really can we ever look at the pyramids the same again ? There would be 11 Earths below. I got tired of shrinking them Cheers Don Barone ... Now back to Jupiter and some new angles.
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Aug 3, 2015 8:39:47 GMT -5
Might be the entire Giza Plateau is the elusive 'Hall of Records', as per the Rosicrucians. Keep calm in view of a tsunami
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Aug 3, 2015 20:55:55 GMT -5
Hi Charlotte I am sorry to say that it is time for some math. Sorry again but I will try to keep it as simple as I can for the mathematically challenged out there. As you know one of my, in my opinion of course, biggest discoveries which has gone virtually unrecognized and unnoticed was that the Great Pyramid and G2 were in the precise, and I mean exact ratio of the sq root of 3 to Phi. Simply stated it means that 440 cubits (base of G1) divided by 411.04 cubits ( base of G2 ) is equal to and the exact same as saying or dividing sq root of 3 (1.73205) by Phi (1.618034). Both of these yield the ratio or number 1.07045543 ( 440 / 411.04) and 1.07046627 (sq root of 3 / Phi) So one can say that The Great Pyramid is the sq root of 3 and G2 is Phi and be totally accurate. Now I have been searching again lately for a simple key for other measurements in our solar system. If The Giza Plateau and maybe even all of Egypt is a solar system map for us then it has to all tie into a simple 9 by 11 grid and the measurements found within the three pyramids of Giza and so I continue the search. Today I came up with this. I have long struggled with The Bent Pyramid trying to find out what exactly were the angles used and what were the measurements as originally set out by The Ancient Builders. Now John Legon came up with a very interesting idea a while ago and here is his website. John Legon: The Bent Pyramid On this page he proposed that the slope length for the lower part was exactly the height of the upper part so this was in fact 110.00 cubits. I originally dismissed this as being too simplistic but today I was trying something that ties into something I posted earlier in this post and came to a startling discovery. Yes this may be a simple concept but I found that it has many hidden ramifications, What I will do first off is post a diagram that shows The Bent Pyramid using John Legon measurements and his original idea. (Forgive The Saturn but it looks so neat). Please let me quickly walk you through the math. It really only involves Pythagoras' Theorem that is the square of the longest side is equal to the squares of the other two sides. (example: 5 squared = 4 squared + 3 squared ) Firstly we assume as John did that the base of The Bent is 362 cubits. The purple line would be the square root of - the square of the yellow line (110 squared) minus the square of the red line (90 squared) to get 110 squared or 12100 - 90 squared or 8100 to get 4000. Square root of 4000 is 63.24555 . The green line is simply 181 (1/2 362) - 63.24555 = 117.7 5445. Okay on the surface even I said ... so what ? Well what I found is simply astounding. The angles for now are simply figured out from the tan of the lengths we have but please observe this. It is wild. In the top half we have a right angled triangle of base of 117.75445 cubits, a height of 110.00 cubits and a slope of 161.14003 cubits. So what you might say and I have to be honest I did not see it at first either. However I am always dividing and multiplying trying to find something that works and so it was that when I went to figure out the angle for the top part of the pyramid I had cause to divide 117.75445 by 110.00. Now I had not expected anything unusual but here is the result of doing that. 117.75445 divided by 110.00 gives us 1.070494971 and unless you don't remember anything from on top of the picture this is the precise number that we got when we divided 440.00 by 411.04 and when we divided sq root of 3 by P hi. Here are the comparisons: 440.00 /411.04 = 1.070455430 (99.996 to 117.75445 / 110 0 Sq rt of 3 / Phi = 1.070466269 (99.997 to 117.75445 / 110.00 ) 117.75445 / 110.00 = 1.070494971 Simply astounding. So using our simple 9 by 11 grid and numbers again we have discovered how to get the ratio of sq rt of 3 to Phi AND the ratio of The Great Pyramid to P2) . So now our diagram might look like this ...
Well now that's what I get for using someone else's drawing. It is not to scale. Small break while I draw one to the correct scale ... be right back
Cheers Don Barone
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Aug 3, 2015 22:45:08 GMT -5
Well all I don't think anyone has ever looked at The Bent Pyramid quite like this before so I am entitling this The "New" Bent Pyramid at Dahshar. And even if this is not correct, which I now believe is not probable. it has shown how once again the simple 9 by 11 grid can work miracles and continues to fuel the belief that The Giza Plateau was planned by thinkers far beyond the norm. Enjoy ...
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Aug 6, 2015 17:57:50 GMT -5
Just a very neat little equation that uniquely ties in Phi, Pi and the square root of 3 to 18/5 or 3.6 or 1/10 th of the angle of a perfect pentagram (36 degrees) or 1/100 th of the number of degrees in a circle.
[(Sq rt of 3 / Phi ) squared] x Pi = 3.599945 / 3.6 = 0.999985 or 99.99985 accurate
This is [(1.73205 / 1.618034) squared] x 3.14159265 = 3.599945 and if we add ( multiply by the square root of 2 we get 5.0910908230184962599211384497926 and when we square this we get 25.92 and amazingly and now wait for this because even I was surprised when I did the multiplication times 2 we get .... 51.84 (actual = 51.8384) the Pi and Phi and 5.5 / 7 angle at The Great Pyramid at Giza. Very nice. Don
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Aug 7, 2015 7:11:38 GMT -5
Ahh, of course, how simple, the tyranny of number, what was I thinking, now I understand it all. Hi Don
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Aug 7, 2015 15:52:41 GMT -5
I am really sorry Charlotte that you can not see the beauty in all of this. The builders seem to have combined Pi, Phi and the square roots of 2 and 3 in simple elegant three dimensional structures that have stood for at the very least 4,500 years and I honestly think much longer and I think it proves, at least to me, that the same geometry was at work at Giza and Dahshar. John Legon did a masterful study on The Bent Pyramid but I think he may have got it wrong. He used 110.1 and 89.9 cubits for the split at The Bent. He did this because at Giza it worked out to 1101 cubits NOT 1100 even. However I took his drawing and all I changed was 110.1 to 110.00 even, and 89.9 to 90.0 even. From there the geometry becomes self evident and ties into The Great Pyramid and the entire Giza Plateau with ease. Here is my diagram. Cheers Don
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Aug 7, 2015 19:40:49 GMT -5
Hi all well sometimes one gets a fresh perspective when one looks at things a different way so that is what I did. I looked at The Bent Pyramid ... corner on and then calculated the measurements, this is the result. Now the angle was very close to 45.00 degrees and I think that if I had been building this structure I would have encoded 45.00 degrees since the square root of 2 is everywhere within it and since sq rt of 2 is derived from the 45.00 degree angle and nowhere else it would seem logical to do so so I figured out the sizes as you see it above and then calculated what the height would have to be and it came to what you see below. BUT from the face on we would see this ... Checks for 395.9727 and 395.9798 or accuracy of 0.0071 or 7/1000th of a cubit or 1.5 / 100th of an inch Conclusion: The Bent Pyramid was designed to show us the 45.0 degree angle when viewed from the corner on. These builders really were something else. Cheers Don
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Aug 7, 2015 19:43:32 GMT -5
But I have a sinking feeling that this is going to force me to revise my previous work on this pyramid.
However many have said that there appears to be more than on angle involved so maybe it was designed to show us several things this being one of them (45.0 degrees corner on)
Regards Don
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Aug 7, 2015 19:47:25 GMT -5
I am starting to think that this pyramid is not at all what we think it is. We assume that the corners of the upper part all are the same but maybe they are not, Maybe it is designed to give us two .. or more results. How I wish I could have seen them ... and measured them when they were new and pristine. Regards Don
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Aug 8, 2015 8:55:13 GMT -5
Don, it was a light hearted remark about my ignorance apropos numbers, however, I can "see the beauty of all this", for instance, you remember "The Enduring Mystery, Pyramidographia", 1646, attributed to John Greaves, of Elizabethan times, who visited Egypt in 1638 to make measurements. The more to it than measurements is cited in the account "out of the Arabick", stating that the King of Egypt who built the Pyramids filled them with riches and treasures, the sciences, the profound science of Astrology, Arithmetic, Geometry and Physics, as well as all things told by wise men and the commentaries of the Priests. It is noteworthy that Mr. Greaves consulted the Libraries of the Monasteries of Mt. Athos, implying recorded knowledge of the Monks. The greater scheme of things.
Of the same times, Shakespeare, in Sonnet 123, gives us to know:
No! Time, thou shalt not boast that I do change: Thy pyramids built up with newer might To me are nothing novel, nothing strange; They are but dressings of a former sight.
The former sight, so to speak, is also alluded to in the Pyramidiographia, in that a deluge was foretold which will come to Egypt, hence the King built the Pyramids to fill them with said treasures of knowledge, for posterity. Madam Blavatsky writes of a time when waves dashed against the Pyramids. This and more information from different sources, affords me some understanding of the Pyramids and Giza Plateau. I envy you and everyone who speaks the universal language of Number, and as said before, the Rosicrucian inform us that the measure used by the Builders was the inch, also had from Wikipedia, the Pyramid inch.
|
|
|
Post by Don Barone on Aug 8, 2015 19:37:59 GMT -5
Hi Charlotte an eloquent reply as always. Here is a great simulator so I can watch the planets go round and round and as I was watching I was thinking ... have these really been going around and around for 4.6 BILLION years. And so to the calculator I go as always. Earth circling for 4.6 or is it really 4.5 billion years and what of Pluto ? How many orbits has it made ? Well 4,500,000,000 / 247.94 (years to circle for Pluto) =18,149,552.3 and 1/this is 5.51 but we always use 5.5 so what can we maybe infer from this. Well if it is supposed to be 5.5 then 1/5.5 = 0.18181818181818181818181818181818 (x a whole bunch) and we get 18,181,818.182 and now multiply by orbit for Pluto and we get 247.94 x 18,181,818.182 equaling 4,508,000,000,000 !!!!!!!!! Now that is pretty damn close to 4.5 billion. To be exact Pluto would have to rotate around it's orbit in 4,500,000,000 / 18181818.182 and we get precisely 249.5000 years Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm ... I wonder Cheers Don Oops almsot forgot ... the link to the solar system ... Well I decided to go and calculate the elliptical path in total distance traveled of my long neglected 9TH PLANET Pluto and found something extremely interesting. The distance calculated to be 36,328,668,900 kilometers which appears to be almost precisely 20 times the number of times Pluto has circled the solar system . Okay so what does this all mean ... Well ... IF the solar system is in fact 4.5 billion years old (4,500,000,000 years) then Pluto at orbital period of 247.94 years, has gone around it 18,149,552.3 now this is almost precisely, and here I get a very funny felling in my stomach, for it appears that Pluto's elliptical circumference is 2000 times larger that the number of times it has circled the solar system ... I mean honestly what are the odds of this ? (Actual - 2000 / 2,000.8144664 or about 99.92 %) Now there have been interlopers through our solar system and this could have thrown off the distances of Pluto so here is what I propose. Age of Solar System = 4,500,000,000 Number of times Pluto has circled it = 18,181,818.182 Actual orbital elliptical perimeter of Pluto is 2,000 times 18,181,818.182 = 36,363,636,364 Speed of Pluto is 36,363,636,364 / 247.50 / 365.2545 / 24 / 60 / 60 = 4.6556764 kilometers per second. Actual = Average orbital speed4.67 km/s as per WikiThis solar system of ours may be more ordered than I thought for John Legon has the width of the top section at The Bent Pyramid as 117.40 and the distnace across the Pluto orbit is ( 2 x 5,874,000,000 = 11,748,000) Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ... I wonder. Well Pluto you are back on my list of planets for sure now and I shall now go look for you at Giza !
|
|